Literature DB >> 28192744

Revisiting informal payments in 29 transitional countries: The scale and socio-economic correlates.

Nazim Habibov1, Alex Cheung2.   

Abstract

This study assesses informal payments (IPs) in 29 transitional countries using a fully comparable household survey. The countries of the former Soviet Union, especially those in the Caucasus and Central Asia, exhibit the highest scale of IPs, followed by Southern Europe, and then Eastern Europe. The lowest and the highest scale of IPs were in Slovenia (2.7%) and Azerbaijan (73.9%) respectively. We found that being from a wealthier household, experiencing lower quality of healthcare in the form of long waiting times, lack of medicines, absence of personnel, and disrespectful treatment, and having relatives to help when needed, are associated with a higher odds ratio of IPs. Conversely, working for the government is associated with a lower odds ratio of IPs. Living in the countries of the former Soviet Union and in Mongolia is associated with the highest likelihood of IPs, and this is followed by the countries of the Southern Europe. In contrast, living in the countries of Eastern Europe is associated with the lowest likelihood of IPs.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corruption; Health policy and planning; Informal payments; Post-communist countries

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28192744     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  The Influence of In-Group Membership on Trust in Health-Care Professionals in Kazakhstan.

Authors:  Brett J Craig; Gulaiim Almatkyzy; Yuliya Yurashevich
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-07-24

2.  The red packet phenomenon from the perspective of young Chinese doctors: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Hanhui Xu; Mengci Yuan
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.834

3.  Poverty Does Make Us Sick.

Authors:  Nazim Habibov; Alena Auchynnikava; Rong Luo
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.462

4.  Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Alban Fejza; Mrika Aliu; Peter Jüni; David C Goodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Institutional Determinants of Informal Payments for Health Services: An Exploratory Analysis across 117 Countries.

Authors:  Cristian Incaltarau; Adrian V Horodnic; Colin C Williams; Liviu Oprea
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  How Different Motivations for Making Informal Out-Of-Pocket Payments Vary in Their Influence on Users' Satisfaction with Healthcare, Local and National Government, and Satisfaction with Life?

Authors:  Nazim Habibov; Alena Auchynnikava; Lida Fan; Yunhong Lyu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Informal payments in public hospitals in Malawi: the case of Kamuzu Central Hospital.

Authors:  Annette Mphande-Namangale; Isabel Kazanga-Chiumia
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2021-11-24

8.  The Effects of Healthcare Quality on the Willingness to Pay More Taxes to Improve Public Healthcare: Testing Two Alternative Hypotheses from the Research Literature.

Authors:  Nazim Habibov; Rong Luo; Alena Auchynnikava
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.462

Review 9.  Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches.

Authors:  Taryn Vian
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.640

10.  New insight into the informal patients' payments on the evidence of literature: a systematic review study.

Authors:  Arefeh Pourtaleb; Mehdi Jafari; Hesam Seyedin; Ali Akhavan Behbahani
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.