Literature DB >> 28192631

Thyroid cytology-nuclear versus architectural atypia within the "Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance" Bethesda category have significantly different rates of malignancy.

Tiffany Rui Xuan Gan1, Min En Nga2, Jeffrey Huey Yew Lum2, Wendy Meihua Wong3, Wee Boon Tan3, Rajeev Parameswaran3, Kee Yuan Ngiam3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology is the most widely used classification system for the reporting of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens. However, the "atypical" category ("atypia of undetermined significance" [AUS] or "follicular lesion of undetermined significance" [FLUS]) continues to cause diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. The objectives of this study were to describe the differential malignancy rates of FNACs diagnosed as AUS/FLUS based on nuclear or architectural atypia and to assess the significance of demographic and ultrasonographic features in predicting malignancy in this category.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all thyroid FNACs between 2008 and 2014 that were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS at a tertiary referral center in Singapore. Patient demographics, preoperative ultrasonographic features, and follow-up data were collected and correlated with the final histopathologic diagnosis in resected cases.
RESULTS: In total, 309 thyroid nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS, and 137 (44%) were surgically excised. Final histology yielded 37 (27%) malignancies. The malignancy rate for nodules that featured nuclear atypia was significantly higher at 36.8% than the rate for nodules that had only architectural atypia at 14.7% (P < .01). After up to 3 repeat FNACs, 67.1% of cases had a more definitive diagnosis. The only predictive sonographic finding for malignancy was irregular margins (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: The disparity between malignancy risks within the Bethesda "atypical" category suggests that cytologic (nuclear) atypia is significantly more predictive of malignancy than architectural atypia. This supports the substratification of patients according to risk and a corresponding management approach within this category. A sonographic finding of irregular margins is also predictive for malignancy. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:245-256.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bethesda classification; atypia of undetermined significance (AUS); fine-needle aspiration cytology; follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS); malignancy risk

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28192631     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current controversies and future directions in the diagnosis and management of differentiated thyroid cancers.

Authors:  Timothy M Ullmann; Katherine D Gray; Maureen D Moore; Rasa Zarnegar; Thomas J Fahey
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-10

2.  Differences in Thyroid Nodule Cytology and Malignancy Risk Between Children and Adults.

Authors:  Christine E Cherella; Trevor E Angell; Danielle M Richman; Mary C Frates; Carol B Benson; Francis D Moore; Justine A Barletta; Monica Hollowell; Jessica R Smith; Erik K Alexander; Edmund S Cibas; Ari J Wassner
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  Semiquantitative assessment of cytomorphologic features can predict mutation status of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytologic diagnosis.

Authors:  Maryam Shahi; Stephen J Bloechl; Rachel I Vogel; Rupendra Shrestha; Hannah R Krigman; Maria Evasovich; Lynn A Burmeister; Khalid Amin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  The diversities in thyroid cytopathology practices among Asian countries using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology.

Authors:  Truong Phan Xuan Nguyen; Vien Thanh Truong; Kennichi Kakudo; Huy Gia Vuong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

5.  Clinical and pathologic features for predicting malignancy in thyroid follicular neoplasms.

Authors:  Kwangsoon Kim; Chan Kwon Jung; Dong-Jun Lim; Ja Seong Bae; Jeong Soo Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

6.  A Large Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cohort with Long-Term Population-Based Follow-Up.

Authors:  Dianna L Ng; Annemieke van Zante; Ann Griffin; Nancy K Hills; Britt-Marie Ljung
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.506

7.  Malignancy rates for Bethesda III subcategories in thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).

Authors:  Leticia Mosca; Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva; Paulo Campos Carneiro; Danielle Azevedo Chacon; Vergilius Jose Furtado de Araujo-Neto; Vergilius Jose Furtado de Araujo-Filho; Claudio Roberto Cernea
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Prospective Study of Bethesda Categories III and IV Thyroid Nodules: Outcomes and Predictive Value of BRAFV600E Mutation.

Authors:  Shiga Rappai Chirayath; Praveen V Pavithran; Nithya Abraham; Vasantha Nair; Nisha Bhavani; Harish Kumar; Usha V Menon; Arun S Menon
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019 May-Jun

9.  A comparative study of two liquid-based preparation methods: membrane-based and sedimentation in fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis in thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Juan Zhao; Xiaofei Yao; Chunjiao Song; Cheng Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.