Literature DB >> 28191866

Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Review of Current Status.

Yihe Yan1, Xiaoyong Cai1, David A Geller2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasing since it was first reported in 1991. Two international expert consensus conferences on LLR surgery were held in Louisville, KY, USA, in 2008 and in Morioka, Japan, in 2014, respectively. While most initial minimally invasive liver resections were typically done for benign lesions in anterior or left lateral segments, LLR is currently being applied for major anatomic resections, malignancy, cirrhosis, and live donor hepatectomy.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Ovid databases was performed and English language articles published between January 2001 and May 2016 were reviewed. The titles and abstracts were screened and those studies related to following several topics were further retrieved.
RESULTS: This review provides a comprehensive insight into the current status of LLR, including hot topics such as laparoscopic major hepatectomy, robotic liver resection, laparoscopic live donor hepatectomy, and laparoscopic ALPPS. LLR has gained greater acceptance in recent years and the acceptance will likely increase with patient benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: This field is anxiously awaiting the results of randomized clinical trials comparing LLR to open liver resection for malignancy. Learning curve and scoring systems for degree of difficulty will continue to evolve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALPPS; laparoscopy; liver resection; living donor; robot assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28191866     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

1.  Exploring new trends in living related liver transplantation.

Authors:  Salvatore Gruttadauria; Duilio Pagano
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Laparoscopic versus open mesohepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Wei Li; Jun Han; Guowei Xie; Yang Xiao; Ke Sun; Kefei Yuan; Hong Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The SMART-ALPPS Protocol: Strategy to Minimize ALPPS Risks by Targeting Invasiveness.

Authors:  G Fiorentini; F Ratti; F Cipriani; R Quattromani; M Catena; M Paganelli; L Aldrighetti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Metabolic imaging and secondary ion mass spectrometry to define the structure and function of liver with acute and chronic pathology.

Authors:  Daria Kuznetsova; Svetlana Rodimova; Alexander Gulin; Dmitry Reunov; Nikolai Bobrov; Anastasia Polozova; Alexander Vasin; Vladislav Shcheslavskiy; Natalia Vdovina; Vladimir Zagainov; Elena Zagaynova
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Outcomes of surgery for giant hepatic hemangioma.

Authors:  Qing-Song Xie; Zi-Xiang Chen; Yi-Jun Zhao; Heng Gu; Xiao-Ping Geng; Fu-Bao Liu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Is the robot necessary for enhanced recovery after minimally invasive surgery hepatectomy?

Authors:  Richard S Hoehn; Samer T Tohme; David A Geller
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  Surgical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic vs. open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Lu; Nannan Zhang; Feiran Wang; Xiaojian Chen; Zhong Chen
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.