G Losurdo1, A Marra1, E Shahini1, B Girardi1, F Giorgio1, A Amoruso1, A Pisani1, D Piscitelli2, M Barone1, M Principi1, A Di Leo1, E Ierardi1. 1. Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, AOU Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, University of Bari, Bari, Italy. 2. Section of Pathology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, AOU Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A link between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and celiac disease (CD) has been hypothesized. METHODS: Literature search was performed in main medical databases. Methods of analysis/inclusion criteria were based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. The end-point was to estimate, by a pooled-data analysis, SIBO prevalence in CD. Proportions/percentages and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by inverse variance method, whereas odd ratios (OR) and their 95% CI were estimated, where available, based on the Mantel-Haenszel method. Data were entered into the RevMan 5.3 software. KEY RESULTS: Eleven articles fulfilled considered criteria. The pooled mean prevalence of SIBO in CD was 20% (95% CI of 10%-30%). In comparison to asymptomatic controls, CD was associated to higher risk of SIBO, with an OR of 10.52 (95% CI 2.69-41.21, P=.0007). Jejunal aspirate culture assessed SIBO prevalence of 11% (95% CI 3%-19%) in CD, whereas breath tests detected a higher value (23%, 95% CI 10%-37%). The pooled prevalence of SIBO in CD patients who were symptomatic despite a GFD was 28% (95% CI 10%-47%), higher than in asymptomatic celiac patients (pooled prevalence of 10%, with a 95% CI of 3%-16%), despite not statistically significant (P=.06). When GFD-unresponsive CD was defined only by clinical persistence of symptoms, the prevalence of SIBO was higher than in the case of villous atrophy association (31% vs 16% P=.33). CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of available studies may not support a relationship SIBO-CD. Nevertheless, SIBO could be more common in CD when symptoms do not improve after GFD.
BACKGROUND: A link between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and celiac disease (CD) has been hypothesized. METHODS: Literature search was performed in main medical databases. Methods of analysis/inclusion criteria were based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. The end-point was to estimate, by a pooled-data analysis, SIBO prevalence in CD. Proportions/percentages and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by inverse variance method, whereas odd ratios (OR) and their 95% CI were estimated, where available, based on the Mantel-Haenszel method. Data were entered into the RevMan 5.3 software. KEY RESULTS: Eleven articles fulfilled considered criteria. The pooled mean prevalence of SIBO in CD was 20% (95% CI of 10%-30%). In comparison to asymptomatic controls, CD was associated to higher risk of SIBO, with an OR of 10.52 (95% CI 2.69-41.21, P=.0007). Jejunal aspirate culture assessed SIBO prevalence of 11% (95% CI 3%-19%) in CD, whereas breath tests detected a higher value (23%, 95% CI 10%-37%). The pooled prevalence of SIBO in CD patients who were symptomatic despite a GFD was 28% (95% CI 10%-47%), higher than in asymptomatic celiac patients (pooled prevalence of 10%, with a 95% CI of 3%-16%), despite not statistically significant (P=.06). When GFD-unresponsive CD was defined only by clinical persistence of symptoms, the prevalence of SIBO was higher than in the case of villous atrophy association (31% vs 16% P=.33). CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of available studies may not support a relationship SIBO-CD. Nevertheless, SIBO could be more common in CD when symptoms do not improve after GFD.
Authors: Allie B Cichewicz; Elizabeth S Mearns; Aliki Taylor; Talia Boulanger; Michele Gerber; Daniel A Leffler; Jennifer Drahos; David S Sanders; Kelly J Thomas Craig; Benjamin Lebwohl Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Enzo Ierardi; Giuseppe Losurdo; Andrea Iannone; Domenico Piscitelli; Annacinzia Amoruso; Michele Barone; Mariabeatrice Principi; Antonio Pisani; Alfredo Di Leo Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2017-05-31
Authors: Giuseppe Losurdo; Fulvio Salvatore D'Abramo; Giuseppe Indellicati; Chiara Lillo; Enzo Ierardi; Alfredo Di Leo Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Bara El Kurdi; Sumbal Babar; Mahmoud El Iskandarani; Adam Bataineh; Markus M Lerch; Mark Young; Vijay P Singh Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: David Avelar Rodriguez; Paul MacDaragh Ryan; Erick Manuel Toro Monjaraz; Jaime Alfonso Ramirez Mayans; Eamonn Martin Quigley Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 3.418