| Literature DB >> 28191660 |
Keiji Tanese1, Hironori Niizeki2, Atsuhito Seki3, Kazuhiko Nakabayashi4, Shinsuke Nakazawa5, Yoshiki Tokura5, Yuhei Kawashima1, Akiharu Kubo1, Akira Ishiko6.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28191660 PMCID: PMC5697663 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.13770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dermatol ISSN: 0385-2407 Impact factor: 4.005
Figure 1(a) Representative clinical features of the forehead. Moderate pachydermia was noted in the forehead of patient 1. (b) Representative histopathological features of pachydermia (hematoxylin–eosin, original magnification ×4). This specimen was obtained from the forehead of patient 1. Dermal edema, fibrosis and sebaceous hyperplasia were noted. (c) High‐powered view at ×200. Infiltration of mast cells was noted (yellow arrowheads). (d) Immunohistochemical analysis of pachydermia sample for c‐Kit staining (×4). The sample was obtained from the forehead of patient 1. Prominent infiltration of c‐Kit‐positive cells was noted in the dermis. (e) Immunohistochemical analysis of normal forehead skin with c‐Kit staining (×4). This specimen was obtained from the area surrounding a benign tumor and used as a control. (f) Score of the c‐Kit‐positive cells in the dermis. Dermal c‐Kit‐positive cells from five different randomly selected areas in the dermis were counted using a high‐powered field (HPF, ×400), and the average of the five sums was calculated. The number of c‐Kit‐positive cells in the dermis was increased in the pachydermia samples approximately three‐ to eightfold compared with controls.