Literature DB >> 28191636

Cancer type predicts alloimmunization following RhD-incompatible RBC transfusions.

Komal Arora1, James Kelley1, Dawen Sui2, Jing Ning2, Fernando Martinez1, Benjamin Lichtiger1, Ashok Tholpady1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed, RhD-negative oncology patients tend to have lower rates of sensitization to the D antigen when they receive transfusion with RhD-positive blood components. Clinical factors associated with alloimmunization to the D antigen in RhD-negative oncology patients when they receive transfusion with RhD-positive red blood cells (RBCs) have not been well defined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 4-year, retrospective analysis identifying RhD-negative oncology patients who received RhD-positive RBCs and were not previously alloimmunized to the D antigen. Age, sex, race, ABO group, primary oncology diagnosis, and numbers of RhD-incompatible RBC transfusions were recorded. The association between antibody formation and clinical factors was studied. The incidence of alloanti-D was calculated from a subsequent antibody-detection test performed at least 28 days after receipt of the first transfusion of RhD-positive RBCs.
RESULTS: In total, 545 RhD-negative oncology patients received 4295 RhD-positive RBC transfusions. Of these, 76 (14%) became alloimmunized to the D antigen. Diagnosis type was the only factor significantly associated with responder status. The logistic regression model indicated that patients who had myelodysplastic syndrome or solid malignancies were more likely to be responders than those who had acute leukemia.
CONCLUSION: We measured a 14% sensitization rate to the D antigen in our RhD-negative oncology population. The rate of alloimmunization was higher in patients who had solid cancers (22.6%) or myelodysplastic syndrome (23%) compared with those who had other hematologic malignancies (7%). Knowledge of diagnoses that predispose to RhD alloimmunization enables better utilization of RhD-negative RBCs during times of shortage.
© 2016 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28191636     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

Review 1.  Shifting ground and gaps in transfusion support of patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Christine Cserti-Gazdewich
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 2.  Transfusion-related red blood cell alloantibodies: induction and consequences.

Authors:  Christopher A Tormey; Jeanne E Hendrickson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Prevalence of Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization among Transfused Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Authors:  Shafini Mohamed Yusoff; Rosnah Bahar; Mohd Nazri Hassan; Noor Haslina Mohd Noor; Marini Ramli; Nor Fadhilah Shafii
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2020-09-30

4.  Anti-D immunization rates may exceed 50% in many clinically relevant settings, despite varying widely among patient cohorts.

Authors:  Willy Albert Flegel; Franz Friedrich Wagner; Diarmaid Padraig Ó Donghaile
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.