Literature DB >> 28191606

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) into Chinese.

Min Yao1, Long Yang1, Zuo-Yuan Cao2, Shao-Dan Cheng3, Shuang-Lin Tian4, Yue-Li Sun1, Jing Wang1, Bao-Ping Xu1, Xiao-Chun Hu5, Yong-Jun Wang1, Ying Zhang6, Xue-Jun Cui7.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) for the Chinese language, and to evaluate its psychometric properties. The SPADI was translated and cross-culturally adapted for the Chinese language according to established guidelines. Participants completed the SPADI questionnaire, a visual analogue scale (VAS), and the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), and were assessed using the Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the latent dimensions, and Cronbach's α to measure internal consistency. The construct validity was tested by Pearson correlations with the Constant-Murley score, VAS, and SF-36, while intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the test-retest reliability of the Chinese SPADI. The floor and ceiling effects were calculated by the proportion of participants who obtained the highest (100) and lowest (0) possible score on the baseline questionnaires. We tested its psychometric properties with 120 participants (55 men and 65 women, age: 55.64 ± 9.49 years, duration: 62.75 ± 15.96 weeks) with shoulder pain. And 58 participants completed the SPADI again within 7 days of the first completion to test the test-retest reliability. The Chinese version of the SPADI displayed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Test-retest reliability was high with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87. A very good correlation was observed between the SPADI and the Constant-Murley score (r = 0.69), a good correlation between the SPADI and the VAS (r = 0.40), and a fair correlation between the SPADI and the SF-36 (r = 0.36). There were no significant floor and ceiling effects in the total Chinese SPADI. The Chinese version of the SPADI is a valid and reliable tool that could be used to measure the degree of pain and disability in Chinese-speaking patients with shoulder pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Construct validity; Internal consistency; Reliability; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; Shoulder pain; Visual analogue scale

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28191606     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3562-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  33 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures.

Authors:  Felix Angst; Géza Pap; Anne F Mannion; Daniel B Herren; André Aeschlimann; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Beat R Simmen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10-15

3.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

Authors:  F Angst; J Goldhahn; G Pap; A F Mannion; K E Roach; D Siebertz; S Drerup; H K Schwyzer; B R Simmen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 5.  Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

Authors:  Felix Angst; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; André Aeschlimann; Beat R Simmen; Jörg Goldhahn
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis.

Authors:  D L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  Assessment of shoulder range of motion: introduction of a novel patient self-assessment tool.

Authors:  Cordelia W Carter; William N Levine; Conor P Kleweno; Louis U Bigliani; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Measuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.

Authors:  J W Williams; D R Holleman; D L Simel
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Patty Solomon; Kenneth Prkachin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  9 in total

1.  Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Italian cross-cultural validation in patients with non-specific shoulder pain.

Authors:  Fabrizio Brindisino; Tiziana Indaco; Giuseppe Giovannico; Diego Ristori; Lorenza Maistrello; Andrea Turolla
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-31

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the simple shoulder test in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Tamer Shousha; Fatima Alowais; Ashokan Arumugam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Quantitative Ultrasonographic Analysis of Changes of the Suprascapular Nerve in the Aging Population With Shoulder Pain.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Wu; Lan-Rong Chen; Hsiang-Chi Chang; Ke-Vin Chang; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-19

4.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Subacromial Ultrasonography: Reliability and Influencing Factors.

Authors:  Che-Yu Lin; Chia-Ching Chou; Lan-Rong Chen; Wei-Ting Wu; Po-Cheng Hsu; Tung-Han Yang; Ke-Vin Chang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Urdu translation of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and its validity and reliability on adhesive capsulitis patients.

Authors:  Ammara Munir; Mehwish Ikram; Syed Shakil Ur Rehman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Malay Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.

Authors:  Caryn-Ann Ho; Jerri Chiu Yun Ling; Samihah Abdul Karim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Chinese (Mandarin) instructions of the 6-minute walk test: A validation study.

Authors:  Vivian Z Tan; Meredith Q Lee; Daryl L Wong; Katherin S Huang; Melissa Y Chan; Clement C Yan; Meredith T Yeung
Journal:  Hong Kong Physiother J       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 8.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

9.  A novel taping therapy for pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Sun-Young Moon; Jung-Eun Kim; O-Jin Kwon; Ae-Ran Kim; Da-Heui Kim; Jae-Hong Kim; Hwa Soo Hwang; Changsop Yang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.