George A Carberry1, Amanda R Smolock2, Mircea Cristescu2, Shane A Wells2, Timothy J Ziemlewicz2, Meghan G Lubner2, J Louis Hinshaw2, Christopher L Brace3, Fred T Lee3. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. Electronic address: gcarberry@uwhealth.org. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792; Department of Radiology Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous hepatic microwave (MW) ablation performed near the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reviewed 118 consecutive peripheral (ablation zone margins within 5 mm of liver capsule) percutaneous MW hepatic ablations performed between June 2010 and August 2015. Ablation zones of 27 tumors (22.8%) extended to ≤ 5 mm from myocardium, and these ablations comprised the study group; the remaining ablations formed the control group. The study cohort included 14 men and 10 women (mean age, 59 y) with 16 hepatocellular carcinomas, 9 metastases, and 2 hemangiomas. Periprocedural imaging was used to evaluate tumor size and distance from the heart, ablation zone size, and complications. Mean tumor size and distance to myocardium were 2.6 cm ± 1.7 and 1.1 cm ± 1.1, respectively. The electronic medical record was used to retrospectively assess local tumor progression (LTP) and electrocardiogram and hemodynamic alterations during and after ablation. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher exact test and t test. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13.6 months (range, 1.2-38.7 months). No arrhythmias occurred during or after ablation in the follow-up period (0/27). There was no difference between groups in frequency of alterations in periprocedural blood pressure (25.9% vs 29.6%, p=0.81) or heart rate (18.5% vs 24.2%, P = .61) or rate of LTP (12.0% vs 10.8%, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous MW ablation near the heart may be safe and effective, without increased risk of cardiac complications and with similar rates of LTP, compared with a control group of peripheral liver ablations.
PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous hepatic microwave (MW) ablation performed near the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reviewed 118 consecutive peripheral (ablation zone margins within 5 mm of liver capsule) percutaneous MW hepatic ablations performed between June 2010 and August 2015. Ablation zones of 27 tumors (22.8%) extended to ≤ 5 mm from myocardium, and these ablations comprised the study group; the remaining ablations formed the control group. The study cohort included 14 men and 10 women (mean age, 59 y) with 16 hepatocellular carcinomas, 9 metastases, and 2 hemangiomas. Periprocedural imaging was used to evaluate tumor size and distance from the heart, ablation zone size, and complications. Mean tumor size and distance to myocardium were 2.6 cm ± 1.7 and 1.1 cm ± 1.1, respectively. The electronic medical record was used to retrospectively assess local tumor progression (LTP) and electrocardiogram and hemodynamic alterations during and after ablation. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher exact test and t test. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13.6 months (range, 1.2-38.7 months). No arrhythmias occurred during or after ablation in the follow-up period (0/27). There was no difference between groups in frequency of alterations in periprocedural blood pressure (25.9% vs 29.6%, p=0.81) or heart rate (18.5% vs 24.2%, P = .61) or rate of LTP (12.0% vs 10.8%, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous MW ablation near the heart may be safe and effective, without increased risk of cardiac complications and with similar rates of LTP, compared with a control group of peripheral liver ablations.