Literature DB >> 28190683

There and back again: Two views on the protein folding puzzle.

Alexei V Finkelstein1, Azat J Badretdin2, Oxana V Galzitskaya3, Dmitry N Ivankov4, Natalya S Bogatyreva4, Sergiy O Garbuzynskiy3.   

Abstract

The ability of protein chains to spontaneously form their spatial structures is a long-standing puzzle in molecular biology. Experimentally measured folding times of single-domain globular proteins range from microseconds to hours: the difference (10-11 orders of magnitude) is the same as that between the life span of a mosquito and the age of the universe. This review describes physical theories of rates of overcoming the free-energy barrier separating the natively folded (N) and unfolded (U) states of protein chains in both directions: "U-to-N" and "N-to-U". In the theory of protein folding rates a special role is played by the point of thermodynamic (and kinetic) equilibrium between the native and unfolded state of the chain; here, the theory obtains the simplest form. Paradoxically, a theoretical estimate of the folding time is easier to get from consideration of protein unfolding (the "N-to-U" transition) rather than folding, because it is easier to outline a good unfolding pathway of any structure than a good folding pathway that leads to the stable fold, which is yet unknown to the folding protein chain. And since the rates of direct and reverse reactions are equal at the equilibrium point (as follows from the physical "detailed balance" principle), the estimated folding time can be derived from the estimated unfolding time. Theoretical analysis of the "N-to-U" transition outlines the range of protein folding rates in a good agreement with experiment. Theoretical analysis of folding (the "U-to-N" transition), performed at the level of formation and assembly of protein secondary structures, outlines the upper limit of protein folding times (i.e., of the time of search for the most stable fold). Both theories come to essentially the same results; this is not a surprise, because they describe overcoming one and the same free-energy barrier, although the way to the top of this barrier from the side of the unfolded state is very different from the way from the side of the native state; and both theories agree with experiment. In addition, they predict the maximal size of protein domains that fold under solely thermodynamic (rather than kinetic) control and explain the observed maximal size of the "foldable" protein domains.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Folding funnel; Free-energy landscape; Levinthal's paradox; Phase separation; Protein folding; Protein secondary structure assembly

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28190683     DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Life Rev        ISSN: 1571-0645            Impact factor:   11.025


  9 in total

1.  Expanding the toolbox for predictive parameters describing antibody stability considering thermodynamic and kinetic determinants.

Authors:  Michaela Blech; Richard Melien; Nuska Tschammer; Beate Presser; Dariush Hinderberger; Patrick Garidel
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Modeling protein folding in vivo.

Authors:  Irina Sorokina; Arcady Mushegian
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 3.  The Role of Hydrogen Bonding in the Folding/Unfolding Process of Hydrated Lysozyme: A Review of Recent NMR and FTIR Results.

Authors:  Domenico Mallamace; Enza Fazio; Francesco Mallamace; Carmelo Corsaro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Life in Phases: Intra- and Inter- Molecular Phase Transitions in Protein Solutions.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky; Alexei V Finkelstein
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-12-08

Review 5.  Is Protein Folding a Thermodynamically Unfavorable, Active, Energy-Dependent Process?

Authors:  Irina Sorokina; Arcady R Mushegian; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Residue Folding Degree-Relationship to Secondary Structure Categories and Use as Collective Variable.

Authors:  Vladimir Sladek; Ryuhei Harada; Yasuteru Shigeta
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Combined approaches from physics, statistics, and computer science for ab initio protein structure prediction: ex unitate vires (unity is strength)?

Authors:  Marc Delarue; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-07-24

Review 8.  Degradation of proteins by PROTACs and other strategies.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Xueyang Jiang; Feng Feng; Wenyuan Liu; Haopeng Sun
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 9.  Solution of Levinthal's Paradox and a Physical Theory of Protein Folding Times.

Authors:  Dmitry N Ivankov; Alexei V Finkelstein
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.