Literature DB >> 28190097

Comparison of transplastomic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Nicotiana tabacum expression system for the production of a bacterial endoglucanase.

Matteo Faè1, Sonia Accossato1,2, Rino Cella1, Fabrizia Fontana3, Michel Goldschmidt-Clermont3, Sadhu Leelavathi4, Vanga Siva Reddy4, Paolo Longoni5.   

Abstract

The bulk production of recombinant enzymes by either prokaryotic or eukaryotic organisms might contribute to replace environmentally non-friendly chemistry-based industrial processes with enzyme-based biocatalysis, provided the cost of enzyme production is low. In this context, it is worth noting that the production of recombinant proteins by photosynthetic organisms offer both eukaryotic (nuclear) and prokaryotic (chloroplast) alternatives, along with the advantage of an autotrophic nutrition. Compared to nuclear transformation, chloroplast transformation generally allows a higher level of accumulation of the recombinant protein of interest. Furthermore, among the photosynthetic organisms, there is a choice of using either multicellular or unicellular ones. Tobacco, being a non-food and non-feed plant, has been considered as a good choice for producing enzymes with applications in technical industry, using a transplastomic approach. Also, unicellular green algae, in particular Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, have been proposed as candidate organisms for the production of recombinant proteins. In the light of the different features of these two transplastomic systems, we decided to make a direct comparison of the efficiency of production of a bacterial endoglucanase. With respect to the amount obtained, 14 mg g-1 of biomass fresh weight equivalent to 8-10% of the total protein content and estimated production cost, 1.5-2€ kg-1, tobacco proved to be far more favorable for bulk enzyme production when compared to C. reinhardtii which accumulated this endoglucanase at 0.003% of the total protein.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellulase; Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Chloroplast; Molecular farming; Tobacco

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28190097     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-017-8164-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

Review 1.  Manipulation of the microalgal chloroplast by genetic engineering for biotechnological utilization as a green biofactory.

Authors:  Yong Min Kwon; Kyung Woo Kim; Tae-Young Choi; Sun Young Kim; Jaoon Young Hwan Kim
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Harnessing the Algal Chloroplast for Heterologous Protein Production.

Authors:  Edoardo Andrea Cutolo; Giulia Mandalà; Luca Dall'Osto; Roberto Bassi
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-30

3.  Multigenic engineering of the chloroplast genome in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Marco Larrea-Alvarez; Saul Purton
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 4.  Advantages of Heterotrophic Microalgae as a Host for Phytochemicals Production.

Authors:  Surumpa Jareonsin; Chayakorn Pumas
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-12

5.  A microalgal-based preparation with synergistic cellulolytic and detoxifying action towards chemical-treated lignocellulose.

Authors:  Manuel Benedetti; Simone Barera; Paolo Longoni; Zeno Guardini; Natalia Herrero Garcia; David Bolzonella; Damar Lopez-Arredondo; Luis Herrera-Estrella; Michel Goldschmidt-Clermont; Roberto Bassi; Luca Dall'Osto
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 6.  The Algal Chloroplast as a Testbed for Synthetic Biology Designs Aimed at Radically Rewiring Plant Metabolism.

Authors:  Harry O Jackson; Henry N Taunt; Pawel M Mordaka; Alison G Smith; Saul Purton
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Current Status and Perspective on the Use of Viral-Based Vectors in Eukaryotic Microalgae.

Authors:  Omayra C Bolaños-Martínez; Ganesan Mahendran; Sergio Rosales-Mendoza; Sornkanok Vimolmangkang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.085

Review 8.  Industrial Use of Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes: The Fine Line Between Production Strategy and Economic Feasibility.

Authors:  Moira Giovannoni; Giovanna Gramegna; Manuel Benedetti; Benedetta Mattei
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.