Literature DB >> 28189838

Auditory perceptual load: A review.

Sandra Murphy1, Charles Spence2, Polly Dalton3.   

Abstract

Selective attention is a crucial mechanism in everyday life, allowing us to focus on a portion of incoming sensory information at the expense of other less relevant stimuli. The circumstances under which irrelevant stimuli are successfully ignored have been a topic of scientific interest for several decades now. Over the last 20 years, the perceptual load theory (e.g. Lavie, 1995) has provided one robust framework for understanding these effects within the visual modality. The suggestion is that successful selection depends on the perceptual demands imposed by the task-relevant information. However, less research has addressed the question of whether the same principles hold in audition and, to date, the existing literature provides a mixed picture. Here, we review the evidence for and against the applicability of perceptual load theory in hearing, concluding that this question still awaits resolution.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Auditory selective attention; Distractor processing; Perceptual load

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28189838     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Renee M Symonds; Juin W Zhou; Sally L Cole; Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Paying attention to speech: The role of working memory capacity and professional experience.

Authors:  Bar Lambez; Galit Agmon; Paz Har-Shai Yahav; Yuri Rassovsky; Elana Zion Golumbic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Friederike Schlaghecken; James Harte; Katherine L Roberts
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  The Effect of Cognitive Load on Auditory Susceptibility During Automated Driving.

Authors:  Remo M A Van der Heiden; J Leon Kenemans; Stella F Donker; Christian P Janssen
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Auditory Figure-Ground Segregation Is Impaired by High Visual Load.

Authors:  Katharine Molloy; Nilli Lavie; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effect of Task and Attention on Neural Tracking of Speech.

Authors:  Jonas Vanthornhout; Lien Decruy; Tom Francart
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Susceptibility to audio signals during autonomous driving.

Authors:  Remo M A van der Heiden; Christian P Janssen; Stella F Donker; Lotte E S Hardeman; Keri Mans; J Leon Kenemans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual Perceptual Load Does Not Affect the Frequency Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens; Erik van Berlekom; Malina Szychowska; Rasmus Eklund
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.