Jason D Roberts1, Elsayed Z Soliman2, Alvaro Alonso3, Eric Vittinghoff4, Lin Y Chen5, Laura Loehr6, Gregory M Marcus7. 1. Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: jason.roberts@lhsc.on.ca. 2. Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 5. Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 7. Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: greg.marcus@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prolongation of the QT interval has been associated with an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF), but the responsible mechanism remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to subdivide the QT interval into its components and identify the resultant electrocardiographic interval(s) responsible for the association with AF. METHODS: Predefined QT-interval components were assessed for association with incident AF in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated per 1-SD increase in each component. Among QT-interval components exhibiting significant associations, additional analyses evaluating long extremes, defined as greater than the 95th percentile, were performed. RESULTS: Of the 14,625 individuals, 1505 (10.3%) were diagnosed with incident AF during a mean follow-up period of 17.6 years. After multivariable adjustment, QT-interval components involved in repolarization, but not depolarization, exhibited significant associations with incident AF, including a longer ST segment (HR 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.41; P < .001) and a prolonged T-wave onset to T-wave peak (T-onset to T-peak) (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07-1.20; P < .001). Marked prolongation of the ST segment (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04-1.64; P = .022) and T-onset to T-peak (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.09-1.69; P = .006) was also associated with an increased risk of incident AF. CONCLUSION: The association between a prolonged QT interval and incident AF is primarily explained by components involved in ventricular repolarization: prolongation of the ST segment and T-onset to T-peak. These observations suggest that prolongation of phases 2 and 3 of the cardiac action potential drives the association between the QT interval and AF risk.
BACKGROUND: Prolongation of the QT interval has been associated with an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF), but the responsible mechanism remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to subdivide the QT interval into its components and identify the resultant electrocardiographic interval(s) responsible for the association with AF. METHODS: Predefined QT-interval components were assessed for association with incident AF in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated per 1-SD increase in each component. Among QT-interval components exhibiting significant associations, additional analyses evaluating long extremes, defined as greater than the 95th percentile, were performed. RESULTS: Of the 14,625 individuals, 1505 (10.3%) were diagnosed with incident AF during a mean follow-up period of 17.6 years. After multivariable adjustment, QT-interval components involved in repolarization, but not depolarization, exhibited significant associations with incident AF, including a longer ST segment (HR 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.41; P < .001) and a prolonged T-wave onset to T-wave peak (T-onset to T-peak) (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07-1.20; P < .001). Marked prolongation of the ST segment (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04-1.64; P = .022) and T-onset to T-peak (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.09-1.69; P = .006) was also associated with an increased risk of incident AF. CONCLUSION: The association between a prolonged QT interval and incident AF is primarily explained by components involved in ventricular repolarization: prolongation of the ST segment and T-onset to T-peak. These observations suggest that prolongation of phases 2 and 3 of the cardiac action potential drives the association between the QT interval and AF risk.
Authors: D G Wyse; A L Waldo; J P DiMarco; M J Domanski; Y Rosenberg; E B Schron; J C Kellen; H L Greene; M C Mickel; J E Dalquist; S D Corley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Isabelle C Van Gelder; Vincent E Hagens; Hans A Bosker; J Herre Kingma; Otto Kamp; Tsjerk Kingma; Salah A Said; Julius I Darmanata; Alphons J M Timmermans; Jan G P Tijssen; Harry J G M Crijns Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yoko Miyasaka; Marion E Barnes; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen S Cha; Kent R Bailey; Walter P Abhayaratna; James B Seward; Teresa S M Tsang Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L Zhang; K W Timothy; G M Vincent; M H Lehmann; J Fox; L C Giuli; J Shen; I Splawski; S G Priori; S J Compton; F Yanowitz; J Benhorin; A J Moss; P J Schwartz; J L Robinson; Q Wang; W Zareba; M T Keating; J A Towbin; C Napolitano; A Medina Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-12-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jonathan N Johnson; David J Tester; James Perry; Benjamin A Salisbury; Carol R Reed; Michael J Ackerman Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Denis Roy; Mario Talajic; Stanley Nattel; D George Wyse; Paul Dorian; Kerry L Lee; Martial G Bourassa; J Malcolm O Arnold; Alfred E Buxton; A John Camm; Stuart J Connolly; Marc Dubuc; Anique Ducharme; Peter G Guerra; Stefan H Hohnloser; Jean Lambert; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; Gilles O'Hara; Ole Dyg Pedersen; Jean-Lucien Rouleau; Bramah N Singh; Lynne Warner Stevenson; William G Stevenson; Bernard Thibault; Albert L Waldo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; Eric P Leip; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joanne M Murabito; William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paulus Kirchhof; Lars Eckardt; Michael R Franz; Gerold Mönnig; Peter Loh; Horst Wedekind; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Günther Breithardt; Wilhelm Haverkamp Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2003-10
Authors: Katherine C Wu; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Sabina A Haberlen; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Todd T Brown; Matthew J Budoff; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Jared W Magnani; Lawrence A Kingsley; Frank J Palella; Joseph B Margolick; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Sean F Altekruse; Elsayed Z Soliman; Wendy S Post Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 1.468