Literature DB >> 28189749

The Carnism Inventory: Measuring the ideology of eating animals.

Christopher A Monteiro1, Tamara M Pfeiler2, Marcus D Patterson3, Michael A Milburn3.   

Abstract

Beliefs surrounding the practice of eating animals are widely held, and have been argued to constitute an ideology named carnism (Joy, 2009). We developed and validated the novel Carnism Inventory to measure two positively related components of carnistic beliefs: carnistic defense and carnistic domination. We anticipated that carnistic defense would legitimate the practice of eating animals, while carnistic domination would support the killing of animals for their meat. The Carnism Inventory showed the hypothesized two-dimensional structure as well as good internal consistencies and stability (N = 302, Study 1). We also demonstrated the convergent and discriminant validity of the Carnism Inventory (N = 781, Study 2a). As expected, carnistic defense predicted meat consumption, while carnistic domination was a significant predictor of having slaughtered an animal (N = 478, Study 2b). Both scales were significantly related to sociopolitical beliefs, including right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, but only carnistic domination was related to symbolic racism and sexism (N = 373, Study 3). Taken together, our findings highlight the utility of the two-dimensional conceptualization and measurement of carnistic beliefs and offer new insights into one of the most common human behaviors: Eating animals is not only a gustatory behavior, as widely believed, but also an ideological one.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carnism Inventory; Human-animal relations; Killing animals; Meat consumption; Prejudice

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28189749     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  4 in total

1.  Prevalence and psychopathology of vegetarians and vegans - Results from a representative survey in Germany.

Authors:  Georgios Paslakis; Candice Richardson; Mariel Nöhre; Elmar Brähler; Christina Holzapfel; Anja Hilbert; Martina de Zwaan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets.

Authors:  Nicoletta Brazzola; Jan Wohland; Anthony Patt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Understanding the Political Challenge of Red and Processed Meat Reduction for Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Katherine Sievert; Mark Lawrence; Christine Parker; Phillip Baker
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 4.  Selected Psychological Aspects of Meat Consumption-A Short Review.

Authors:  Klaudia Modlinska; Wojciech Pisula
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.