Literature DB >> 28189625

Stabilizing two IgG1 monoclonal antibodies by surfactants: Balance between aggregation prevention and structure perturbation.

Shujing Wang1, Guoliang Wu1, Xinyi Zhang1, Zhou Tian1, Ning Zhang2, Tao Hu2, Weiguo Dai3, Feng Qian4.   

Abstract

Surfactants are widely used as stabilizers in the biopharmaceutical formulations to minimize protein aggregation. Under a fixed stress condition, the protecting and destabilizing effects of surfactants are hypothesized to be highly dependent on the species and concentrations of surfactants and mAb. Therefore, we here studied the aggregation-prevention and structure-perturbation effects of eight commonly used surfactants (Tw20, Tw80, Brij35, Chaps, TrX-100, SDS, Pluronic F68 and F127) on two IgG1 solution formulations under agitation, using analytical methodologies including visual inspection, OD350 measurement, HPLC-SEC, circular dicroism, fluorescence spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. We found that: (1) With concentrations range from 0.02 to 2mg/mL, nonionic surfactants were found to offer efficient aggregation-prevention effect, which is superior than the ionic surfactants; and higher surfactant concentration prevented mAb aggregation better especially under prolonged stability test under stress conditions. (2) The surfactant induced structure-perturbation emerged when even higher surfactant concentration (≥2mg/mL) was used, and such effect was surfactant-property dependent; and (3) the two IgG1 demonstrated different aggregation mechanisms and surfactant dependency, especially at high mAb concentrations. In conclusion, surfactants usage in mAb formulations, including the types and concentrations, should strike an optimal balance between the desirable aggregation-prevention and the detrimental structure-perturbation effects, while the consideration of mAb aggregation mechanism and concentration is also required for surfactant assessment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggregation prevention; Agitation; Monoclonal antibody; Structure perturbation; Surfactants; mAb formulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28189625     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  5 in total

1.  Surfaces Affect Screening Reliability in Formulation Development of Biologics.

Authors:  Mitja Zidar; Gregor Posnjak; Igor Muševič; Miha Ravnik; Drago Kuzman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Molecular and functional analysis of monoclonal antibodies in support of biologics development.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Zhiqiang An; Wenxin Luo; Ningshao Xia; Qinjian Zhao
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 14.870

3.  Safety risk management for low molecular weight process-related impurities in monoclonal antibody therapeutics: Categorization, risk assessment, testing strategy, and process development with leveraging clearance potential.

Authors:  Haibin Luo; Yuling Li; David Robbins; Sheau-Chiann Wang; Guoling Xi; Matthew Cox; Simone M Nicholson; Chenghong Wei; Timothy M Pabst; William K Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 4.  Inhaled antibodies: Quality and performance considerations.

Authors:  Anthony James Hickey; Ian Edward Stewart
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.526

5.  Machine learning reveals hidden stability code in protein native fluorescence.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhang; Yang Yang; Cheng Zhang; Suzanne S Farid; Paul A Dalby
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 7.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.