Literature DB >> 28189365

Bioequivalence Demonstration for Ω-3 Acid Ethyl Ester Formulations: Rationale for Modification of Current Guidance.

Kevin C Maki1, Colleen Johns2, William S Harris3, Mark Puder4, Steven D Freedman5, Thorsteinn Thorsteinsson2, Ahmed Daak2, Adrian L Rabinowicz2, Frederick D Sancilio2.   

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft guidance for establishing bioequivalence (BE) of ω-3 acid ethyl esters (containing both eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and docosahexaenoic acid [DHA] as ethyl esters), used to treat severe hypertriglyceridemia, recommends the conduct of 2 studies: one with participants in the fasting state and one with participants in the fed state. For the fasting study, the primary measures of BE are baseline-adjusted EPA and DHA levels in total plasma lipids. For the fed study, the primary measures of BE are EPA and DHA ethyl esters in plasma. This guidance differs from that established for icosapent ethyl (EPA ethyl esters) in which the primary measure of BE is baseline-adjusted total EPA in plasma lipids for both the fasting and fed states. The FDA guidance for ω-3 acid ethyl esters is not supported by their physiologic characteristics and triglyceride-lowering mechanisms because EPA and DHA ethyl esters are best characterized as pro-drugs. This article presents an argument for amending the FDA draft guidance for ω-3 acid ethyl esters to use baseline-adjusted EPA and DHA in total plasma lipids as the primary measures of BE for both fasting and fed conditions. This change would harmonize the approaches for demonstration of BE for ω-3 acid ethyl esters and icosapent ethyl (EPA ethyl esters) products for future development programs and is the most physiologically rational approach to BE testing.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioequivalence; docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; ethyl esters ω-3 fatty acids; triglycerides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28189365     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  6 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of omega-3 fatty acids in patients with severe sepsis compared with healthy volunteers: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Radhika Parikh; Jason H T Bates; Matthew E Poynter; Benjamin T Suratt; Polly E Parsons; C Lawrence Kien; Daren K Heyland; Karen I Crain; Julie Martin; Jayanthi Garudathri; Renee D Stapleton
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Spectral profiles of commercial omega-3 supplements: an exploratory analysis by ATR-FTIR and 1H NMR.

Authors:  Thiago I B Lopes; Elba S Pereira; Deisy Dos S Freitas; Samuel L Oliveira; Glaucia B Alcantara
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  A novel self-micro-emulsifying delivery system (SMEDS) formulation significantly improves the fasting absorption of EPA and DHA from a single dose of an omega-3 ethyl ester concentrate.

Authors:  Yan Qin; Hilde Nyheim; Else Marie Haram; Joseph M Moritz; Svein Olaf Hustvedt
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 4.  A Comprehensive Review of Chemistry, Sources and Bioavailability of Omega-3 Fatty Acids.

Authors:  Mateusz Cholewski; Monika Tomczykowa; Michał Tomczyk
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Rapid Quantitation of Adulterants in Premium Marine Oils by Raman and IR Spectroscopy: A Data Fusion Approach.

Authors:  Fatema Ahmmed; Daniel P Killeen; Keith C Gordon; Sara J Fraser-Miller
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 6.  Marine Natural Products in Clinical Use.

Authors:  Neshatul Haque; Sana Parveen; Tingting Tang; Jiaen Wei; Zunnan Huang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.085

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.