Literature DB >> 28188915

Machine learning based compartment models with permeability for white matter microstructure imaging.

Gemma L Nedjati-Gilani1, Torben Schneider2, Matt G Hall3, Niamh Cawley2, Ioana Hill4, Olga Ciccarelli2, Ivana Drobnjak5, Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott6, Daniel C Alexander4.   

Abstract

Some microstructure parameters, such as permeability, remain elusive because mathematical models that express their relationship to the MR signal accurately are intractable. Here, we propose to use computational models learned from simulations to estimate these parameters. We demonstrate the approach in an example which estimates water residence time in brain white matter. The residence time τi of water inside axons is a potentially important biomarker for white matter pathologies of the human central nervous system, as myelin damage is hypothesised to affect axonal permeability, and thus τi. We construct a computational model using Monte Carlo simulations and machine learning (specifically here a random forest regressor) in order to learn a mapping between features derived from diffusion weighted MR signals and ground truth microstructure parameters, including τi. We test our numerical model using simulated and in vivo human brain data. Simulation results show that estimated parameters have strong correlations with the ground truth parameters (R2={0.88,0.95,0.82,0.99}) for volume fraction, residence time, axon radius and diffusivity respectively), and provide a marked improvement over the most widely used Kärger model (R2={0.75,0.60,0.11,0.99}). The trained model also estimates sensible microstructure parameters from in vivo human brain data acquired from healthy controls, matching values found in literature, and provides better reproducibility than the Kärger model on both the voxel and ROI level. Finally, we acquire data from two Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients and compare to the values in healthy subjects. We find that in the splenium of corpus callosum (CC-S) the estimate of the residence time is 0.57±0.05s for the healthy subjects, while in the MS patient with a lesion in CC-S it is 0.33±0.12s in the normal appearing white matter (NAWM) and 0.19±0.11s in the lesion. In the corticospinal tracts (CST) the estimate of the residence time is 0.52±0.09s for the healthy subjects, while in the MS patient with a lesion in CST it is 0.56±0.05s in the NAWM and 0.13±0.09s in the lesion. These results agree with our expectations that the residence time in lesions would be lower than in NAWM because the loss of myelin should increase permeability. Overall, we find parameter estimates in the two MS patients consistent with expectations from the pathology of MS lesions demonstrating the clinical potential of this new technique.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28188915     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  Diffusion-time dependence of diffusional kurtosis in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Manisha Aggarwal; Matthew D Smith; Peter A Calabresi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Towards microstructure fingerprinting: Estimation of tissue properties from a dictionary of Monte Carlo diffusion MRI simulations.

Authors:  Gaëtan Rensonnet; Benoît Scherrer; Gabriel Girard; Aleksandar Jankovski; Simon K Warfield; Benoît Macq; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Maxime Taquet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Validation of diffusion MRI estimates of compartment size and volume fraction in a biomimetic brain phantom using a human MRI scanner with 300 mT/m maximum gradient strength.

Authors:  Qiuyun Fan; Aapo Nummenmaa; Barbara Wichtmann; Thomas Witzel; Choukri Mekkaoui; Walter Schneider; Lawrence L Wald; Susie Y Huang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Parameter Inference for Diffusion MRI Signal Models.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Masutani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.760

5.  Corpus callosum axon diameter relates to cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Susie Y Huang; Qiuyun Fan; Natalya Machado; Ani Eloyan; John D Bireley; Andrew W Russo; Sean M Tobyne; Kevin R Patel; Kristina Brewer; Sarah F Rapaport; Aapo Nummenmaa; Thomas Witzel; Janet C Sherman; Lawrence L Wald; Eric C Klawiter
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.511

6.  Tractography in the presence of multiple sclerosis lesions.

Authors:  Ilona Lipp; Greg D Parker; Emma C Tallantyre; Alex Goodall; Steluta Grama; Eleonora Patitucci; Phoebe Heveron; Valentina Tomassini; Derek K Jones
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Multidimensional encoding of brain connectomes.

Authors:  Cesar F Caiafa; Franco Pestilli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Measuring diffusion exchange across the cell membrane with DEXSY (Diffusion Exchange Spectroscopy).

Authors:  James O Breen-Norris; Bernard Siow; Claire Walsh; Ben Hipwell; Ioana Hill; Thomas Roberts; Matt G Hall; Mark F Lythgoe; Andrada Ianus; Daniel C Alexander; Simon Walker-Samuel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Relevance of time-dependence for clinically viable diffusion imaging of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Francesco Grussu; Andrada Ianuş; Carmen Tur; Ferran Prados; Torben Schneider; Enrico Kaden; Sébastien Ourselin; Ivana Drobnjak; Hui Zhang; Daniel C Alexander; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  The sensitivity of diffusion MRI to microstructural properties and experimental factors.

Authors:  Maryam Afzali; Tomasz Pieciak; Sharlene Newman; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; Evren Özarslan; Hu Cheng; Derek K Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.