Literature DB >> 28188880

Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods.

Christine J Hastey1, Suzanne E Dale2, Julia Nary2, Diane Citron3, Jennifer H Law1, Darcie E Roe-Carpenter4, Laurent Chesnel5.   

Abstract

Due to increasing antibiotic resistance among anaerobic bacteria, routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing is recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). This study compared the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) from 920 Clostridium difficile isolates tested against seven antimicrobial agents using the two current CLSI reference methodologies, agar dilution method, vs broth microdilution method. A subset of isolate testing was performed independently by two laboratories to evaluate reproducibility. A negative bias was noted for MICs generated from broth microdilution compared to agar dilution and the reproducibility was variable and drug dependent. Therefore, broth microdilution is not recommended as an alternative to agar dilution for C. difficile antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. difficile; MIC determination; Susceptibility testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28188880     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  4 in total

1.  Genome Location Dictates the Transcriptional Response to PolC Inhibition in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Erika van Eijk; Ilse M Boekhoud; Ed J Kuijper; Ingrid M J G Bos-Sanders; George Wright; Wiep Klaas Smits
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Host-targeted niclosamide inhibits C. difficile virulence and prevents disease in mice without disrupting the gut microbiota.

Authors:  John Tam; Therwa Hamza; Bing Ma; Kevin Chen; Greg L Beilhartz; Jacques Ravel; Hanping Feng; Roman A Melnyk
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Phenotypical and Genotypical Comparison of Clostridium difficile Isolated from Clinical Samples: Homebrew DNA Fingerprinting versus Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (AST) and Clostridial Toxin Genes.

Authors:  Javid Sisakhtpour; Fatemeh Savaheli Moghadam; Sepideh Khodaparast; Nima Khoramabadi; Ashraf Mohabati Mobarez
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  In Vitro Activity of Omadacycline and Five Comparators against Contemporary Ribotypes of Clostridioides difficile in Stockholm, Sweden.

Authors:  Angela Camporeale; Chaitanya Tellapragada; Jelena Kornijenko; Carl Erik Nord; Christian G Giske
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.