Literature DB >> 28188235

Cannabis Edibles: Blood and Oral Fluid Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics and Evaluation of Oral Fluid Screening Devices for Predicting Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Blood and Oral Fluid following Cannabis Brownie Administration.

Matthew N Newmeyer1,2, Madeleine J Swortwood1,3, Maria Andersson1,4, Osama A Abulseoud1, Karl B Scheidweiler1, Marilyn A Huestis5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Roadside oral fluid (OF) Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) detection indicates recent cannabis intake. OF and blood THC pharmacokinetic data are limited and there are no on-site OF screening performance evaluations after controlled edible cannabis. CONTENT: We reviewed OF and blood cannabinoid pharmacokinetics and performance evaluations of the Draeger DrugTest®5000 (DT5000) and Alere™ DDS®2 (DDS2) on-site OF screening devices. We also present data from a controlled oral cannabis administration session.
SUMMARY: OF THC maximum concentrations (Cmax) were similar in frequent as compared to occasional smokers, while blood THC Cmax were higher in frequent [mean (range) 17.7 (8.0-36.1) μg/L] smokers compared to occasional [8.2 (3.2-14.3) μg/L] smokers. Minor cannabinoids Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin and cannabigerol were never detected in blood, and not in OF by 5 or 8 h, respectively, with 0.3 μg/L cutoffs. Recommended performance (analytical sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency) criteria for screening devices of ≥80% are difficult to meet when maximizing true positive (TP) results with confirmation cutoffs below the screening cutoff. TPs were greatest with OF confirmation cutoffs of THC ≥1 and ≥2 μg/L, but analytical sensitivities were <80% due to false negative tests arising from confirmation cutoffs below the DT5000 and DDS2 screening cutoffs; all criteria were >80% with an OF THC ≥5 μg/L cutoff. Performance criteria also were >80% with a blood THC ≥5 μg/L confirmation cutoff; however, positive OF screening results might not confirm due to the time required to collect blood after a crash or police stop. OF confirmation is recommended for roadside OF screening.ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT02177513.
© 2016 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28188235     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.265371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  10 in total

1.  THC and CBD blood and brain concentrations following daily administration to adolescent primates.

Authors:  S L Withey; J Bergman; M A Huestis; S R George; B K Madras
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Free and Glucuronide Urine Cannabinoids after Controlled Smoked, Vaporized and Oral Cannabis Administration in Frequent and Occasional Cannabis Users.

Authors:  Marilyn A Huestis; Cristina Sempio; Matthew N Newmeyer; Maria Andersson; Allan J Barnes; Osama A Abulseoud; Benjamin C Blount; Jennifer Schroeder; Michael L Smith
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Cannabinoid tetrad effects of oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in male and female rats: sex, dose-effects and time course evaluations.

Authors:  Catherine F Moore; Elise M Weerts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.415

Review 4.  Cannabis and Cannabinoids for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  E Alfonso Romero-Sandoval; Ashley L Kolano; P Abigail Alvarado-Vázquez
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Translational models of cannabinoid vapor exposure in laboratory animals.

Authors:  Catherine F Moore; Jeffrey W Stiltner; Catherine M Davis; Elise M Weerts
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Oral Administration of Cannabis and Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Preparations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lourdes Poyatos; Ana Pilar Pérez-Acevedo; Esther Papaseit; Clara Pérez-Mañá; Soraya Martin; Olga Hladun; Adrià Siles; Marta Torrens; Francesco Paolo Busardo; Magí Farré
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Challenges in studying statewide pedestrian injuries and drug involvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Nesoff; Charles C Branas; Silvia S Martins
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-03

8.  Identification of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairment using functional brain imaging.

Authors:  Jodi M Gilman; William A Schmitt; Kevin Potter; Brian Kendzior; Gladys N Pachas; Sarah Hickey; Meena Makary; Marilyn A Huestis; A Eden Evins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 8.294

9.  A comprehensive breath test that confirms recent use of inhaled cannabis within the impairment window.

Authors:  Michael W DeGregorio; Gregory T Wurz; Edward Montoya; Chiao-Jung Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetics of Cannabis and Its Derivatives in Animals and Humans During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding.

Authors:  Anaëlle Monfort; Ema Ferreira; Grégoire Leclair; Gregory Anton Lodygensky
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.988

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.