Literature DB >> 28187056

Operative Mortality Rates of Acoustic Neuroma Surgery: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Shearwood McClelland1, Ellen Kim, James D Murphy, Jerry J Jaboin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Optimal acoustic neuroma (AN) management involves choosing between three treatment modalities: microsurgical excision, radiation, or observation with serial imaging. The reported in-hospital mortality rate of surgery for AN in the United States is 0.5%. However, there has yet to be a nationwide examination of the AN surgery mortality rate encompassing the period beyond initial hospital discharge.
METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2004 to 2013 identified AN patients receiving surgery. Multivariate logistic regression assessed 30-day operative mortality, adjusting for several variables including patient age, race, sex, income, geographic region, primary payer for care, tumor size, and medical comorbidities.
RESULTS: Ten thousand one hundred thirty six patients received surgery as solitary treatment for AN. Mortality at 30 days postoperatively occurred in 49 patients (0.5%); only a Charlson/Deyo score of 2 (odds ratio [OR] = 6.6;95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.6-16.6; p = 0.002) was predictive of increased mortality. No other patient demographic including African-American race, minimum age of 65 or government insurance was predictive of 30-day operative mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day mortality rate following surgery for AN is 1 of 200 (0.5%), equivalent to the established in-hospital operative mortality rate, and 2.5 times higher than the cumulative assessment from single-center studies. No patient demographic other than increasing medical comorbidities reached significance in predicting 30-day operative mortality. The nearly identical rates of 30-day and in-hospital mortality from separate nationwide analyses indicate that nearly all of the operative mortality occurs before initial postoperative discharge from the hospital. This mortality rate provides a framework for comparing the true risks and benefits of surgery versus radiation or observation for AN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28187056     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  3 in total

1.  The utility of "low current" stimulation threshold of intraoperative electromyography monitoring in predicting facial nerve function outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a prospective cohort study of 103 large tumors.

Authors:  Xiang Huang; Junwei Ren; Jian Xu; Ming Xu; Danqi Chen; Mingyu Chen; Kaiyuan Ji; Hai Wang; Huiyu Chen; Lijie Cao; Yilin Shao; Ping Zhong; Richard Ballena; Liangfu Zhou; Ying Mao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Roland Goldbrunner; Michael Weller; Jean Regis; Morten Lund-Johansen; Pantelis Stavrinou; David Reuss; D Gareth Evans; Florence Lefranc; Kita Sallabanda; Andrea Falini; Patrick Axon; Olivier Sterkers; Laura Fariselli; Wolfgang Wick; Joerg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  The Clinical Implications of Spontaneous Hemorrhage in Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Christopher S Hong; Lan Jin; Wyatt B David; Brian Shear; Amy Y Zhao; Yawei Zhang; E Zeynep Erson-Omay; Robert K Fulbright; Anita Huttner; John Kveton; Jennifer Moliterno
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-03-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.