Degang Liu1, David Xu1,2,3, Min Liu4, William Eric Knabe1, Cai Yuan4, Donghui Zhou1, Mingdong Huang4, Samy O Meroueh1,2. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States. 2. Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States. 3. Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing , Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States. 4. Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Science , Gulou District, Fuzhou, Fujian 3500002, China.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions drive every aspect of cell signaling, yet only a few small-molecule inhibitors of these interactions exist. Despite our ability to identify critical residues known as hot spots, little is known about how to effectively engage them to disrupt protein-protein interactions. Here, we take advantage of the ease of preparation and stability of pyrrolinone 1, a small-molecule inhibitor of the tight interaction between the urokinase receptor (uPAR) and its binding partner, the urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPA, to synthesize more than 40 derivatives and explore their effect on the protein-protein interaction. We report the crystal structure of uPAR bound to previously discovered pyrazole 3 and to pyrrolinone 12. While both 3 and 12 bind to uPAR and compete with a fluorescently labeled peptide probe, only 12 and its derivatives inhibit the full uPAR·uPA interaction. Compounds 3 and 12 mimic and engage different hot-spot residues on uPA and uPAR, respectively. Interestingly, 12 is involved in a π-cation interaction with Arg-53, which is not considered a hot spot. Explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations reveal that 3 and 12 exhibit dramatically different correlations of motion with residues on uPAR. Free energy calculations for the wild-type and mutant uPAR bound to uPA or 12 show that Arg-53 interacts with uPA or with 12 in a highly cooperative manner, thereby altering the contributions of hot spots to uPAR binding. The direct engagement of peripheral residues not considered hot spots through π-cation or salt-bridge interactions could provide new opportunities for enhanced small-molecule engagement of hot spots to disrupt challenging protein-protein interactions.
Protein-protein interactions drive every aspect of cell signaling, yet only a few small-molecule inhibitors of these interactions exist. Despite our ability to identify critical residues known as n class="Gene">hot spots, little is known about how to effectively engage them to disrupt protein-protein interactions. Here, we take advantage of the ease of preparation and stability of pyrrolinone 1, a small-molecule inhibitor of the tight interaction between the urokinase receptor (uPAR) and its binding partner, the urokinase-type plasminogen activatoruPA, to synthesize more than 40 derivatives and explore their effect on the protein-protein interaction. We report the crystal structure of uPAR bound to previously discovered pyrazole 3 and to pyrrolinone 12. While both 3 and 12 bind to uPAR and compete with a fluorescently labeled peptide probe, only 12 and its derivatives inhibit the full uPAR·uPA interaction. Compounds 3 and 12 mimic and engage different hot-spot residues on uPA and uPAR, respectively. Interestingly, 12 is involved in a π-cation interaction with Arg-53, which is not considered a hot spot. Explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations reveal that 3 and 12 exhibit dramatically different correlations of motion with residues on uPAR. Free energy calculations for the wild-type and mutant uPAR bound to uPA or 12 show that Arg-53 interacts with uPA or with 12 in a highly cooperative manner, thereby altering the contributions of hot spots to uPAR binding. The direct engagement of peripheral residues not considered hot spots through π-cation or salt-bridge interactions could provide new opportunities for enhanced small-molecule engagement of hot spots to disrupt challenging protein-protein interactions.
Authors: Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner Journal: Proteins Date: 2004-05-01
Authors: May Khanna; Fang Wang; Inha Jo; W Eric Knabe; Sarah M Wilson; Liwei Li; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; Jing Li; George W Sledge; Rajesh Khanna; Samy O Meroueh Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Julie M Leth; Haydyn D T Mertens; Katrine Zinck Leth-Espensen; Thomas J D Jørgensen; Michael Ploug Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yubing Si; David Xu; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; Mona K Ghozayel; Baocheng Yang; Paul A Clemons; Samy O Meroueh Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 3.466