Literature DB >> 28185440

Influence of Gender on Visual Shade Matching in Dentistry.

Oscar E Pecho1, Razvan Ghinea2, Maria M Perez2, Alvaro Della Bona3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accuracy on visual shade matching (VSM) is one of the most difficult procedures in esthetic dentistry. Some variables can influence on this process and gender is one of the most controversial. This observational study evaluated the influence of gender on accuracy of VSM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred observers (65 females and 35 males) shade matched four human upper central incisors (UCI) to shade tabs from Vita Classical (VC) shade guide. In addition, the spectral reflectance values from the four UCI and from the 16 VC shade tabs were measured using a spectroradiometer (SP). Measurements were performed over a gray background, inside a viewing booth and under D65 illuminant (diffuse/0º geometry). CIELAB coordinates (L*, a*, and b*) were calculated according to CIE D65 illuminant and CIE 2º Standard Observer. Instrumental shade matching for each UCI, based on minimum color difference, was performed using two color difference metrics (CIELAB and CIEDE2000(2:1:1)). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and McNemar test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: Irrespective of the color difference metric, the most prevalent shade performed by females showed greater success (50% for CIELAB and 100% for CIEDE2000(2:1:1)) than males (25% for CIELAB and 50% for CIEDE2000(2:1:1)). However, such difference on gender was statistically significant only when using CIEDE2000(2:1:1) color difference metric (p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent shade option resultant from VSM performed by females using VC shade guide perfectly agreed (100% success rate) with measurements from SP and CIEDE2000(2:1:1) color difference metric. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The ability to understand and distinguish color differences in VSM is critical in clinical dentistry. Variation in shade perception due to observer gender can be minimized using additional observers and/or improving shade matching ability. (J Esthet Restor Dent 29:E15-E23, 2017).
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28185440     DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent        ISSN: 1496-4155            Impact factor:   2.843


  4 in total

1.  MOST FREQUENTLY SELECTED SHADE FOR ADVANCE RESTORATION DELIVERED IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL FACILITY IN SOUTH WESTERN NIGERIA.

Authors:  A O Sulaiman; G E Adebayo
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  Does Backgrounds Color Influence the Appearance of Gingiva-Colored Resin-Based Composites?

Authors:  María M Pérez; Cristina Benavides-Reyes; Maria Tejada-Casado; Javier Ruiz-López; Cristina Lucena
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Accelerated Aging Effects on Color Change, Translucency Parameter, and Surface Hardness of Resin Composites.

Authors:  Muhammet Fidan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Factors Involved in the Perception of Enamel Dyschromic Lesions-A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Authors:  Cristina Gasparik; Horațiu Alexandru Colosi; Bianca Elena Varvara; Alexandru Grațian Grecu; Alexandra Iulia Aghiorghiesei; Anca Ștefania Mesaroș; Amalia Mazilu Moldovan; Diana Dudea
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.