Literature DB >> 28185180

Primary iris claw IOL retrofixation with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in cases of inadequate capsular support.

Aditya Kelkar1, Rachana Shah2, Viraj Vasavda3, Jai Kelkar2, Shreekant Kelkar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes and analyze complication rates following primary iris claw IOL retrofixation with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide.
METHODS: This is a retrospective interventional case series. Patients with poor capsular support-diagnosed preoperatively or owing to intraoperative complications-were treated with iris claw IOL retrofixation with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. The data were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: 104 eyes of 102 patients with poor capsular support who underwent the procedure between 2010 and 2013 were analyzed. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months (ranging from 12 to 36 months). Iris claw IOL was implanted in-traumatic subluxated cataracts-24 cases (23.07%), non-traumatic subluxated cataracts in 16 cases (15.38%), or as a complication of cataract surgery-intraoperative posterior capsular rent in 48 cases (46.15%) and intraoperative nucleus drop in 16 cases (15.38%). The final mean best-corrected logMAR visual acuity improved from 1.36 ± 0.64 preoperatively to 0.36 ± 0.32 at 1-year follow-up. Complications included pupil ovalization in 11 cases (10.57%), transient elevation in intraocular pressure in 7 eyes (6.73%), postoperative hypotony in 5 eyes (4.80%), cystoid macular edema in 2 eyes (1.92%), retinal detachment in 1 eye (0.96%), vitreous hemorrhage in 1 eye (0.96%), and hyphema in 1 eye (0.96%).
CONCLUSION: Primary iris claw IOL retrofixation provided excellent alternative in patients with inadequate capsular support. The visual outcomes were good along with favorable rates of complications. The addition of triamcinolone acetonide helps in reducing the chances of cystoid macular edema.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystoid macular edema; Iris claw IOL; Iris claw IOL retrofixation; Triamcinolone acetonide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28185180     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0467-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  25 in total

1.  Secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation: anterior chamber versus scleral fixation long-term comparative evaluation.

Authors:  S Dadeya; P Kumari Sodhi
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  Fibrin glue-assisted sutureless posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in eyes with deficient posterior capsules.

Authors:  Amar Agarwal; Dhivya Ashok Kumar; Soosan Jacob; Chandresh Baid; Athiya Agarwal; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Vitrectomy for retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification.

Authors:  R R Margherio; A R Margherio; S D Pendergast; G A Williams; B R Garretson; L E Strong; M T Trese; M S Cox; T S Hassan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Retinal detachment in eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for removal of retained lens fragments.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Moore; Ingrid U Scott; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy; Timothy G Murray; Judy E Kim; Nancy F Vilar; Mauricio B Pereira; Rodrigo Jorge
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Pharmacologic therapy of aphakic and pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. 1985 update.

Authors:  L M Jampol
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Preliminary results following implantation of iris-suture-fixated posterior-chamber lenses.

Authors:  H Höh; K Ruprecht; N Nikoloudakis; A Palmowski
Journal:  Ger J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-04

7.  [Retropupillary fixation of the iris claw lens in aphakia. 1 year outcome of a new implantation techniques].

Authors:  A Mohr; F Hengerer; C Eckardt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  [Correction of aphakia with retroiridally fixated IOL].

Authors:  M Wolter-Roessler; M Küchle
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  Occurrence of retained lens fragments after phacoemulsification in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J S Stilma; F A van der Sluijs; J C van Meurs; D A Mertens
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Long-term results using scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

Authors:  P McCluskey; B Harrisberg
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  3 in total

1.  Surgical Outcomes of Retropupillary-Fixated Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori; Satish Gooty Agraharam; Sravanthi Sannapuri; Sunny Manwani; Nagalla Balakrishna
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  Comparative analysis of retropupillary iris claw versus scleral-fixated intraocular lens in the management of post-cataract aphakia.

Authors:  Nivean Madhivanan; Sabyasachi Sengupta; Manavi Sindal; Pratheeba Devi Nivean; Maitri Arun Kumar; Murali Ariga
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Comparison of flanged intrascleral intraocular lens fixation versus iris claw intraocular lens fixation: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Aditya S Kelkar; Jai A Kelkar; Akshay A Kothari; Shreekant B Kelkar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.