Literature DB >> 28184954

[Learning how to learn for specialist further education].

G Breuer1, B Lütcke2, M St Pierre2, S Hüttl2.   

Abstract

The world of medicine is becoming from year to year more complex. This necessitates efficient learning processes, which incorporate the principles of adult education but with unchanged periods of further education. The subject matter must be processed, organized, visualized, networked and comprehended. The learning process should be voluntary and self-driven with the aim of learning the profession and becoming an expert in a specialist field. Learning is an individual process. Despite this, the constantly cited learning styles are nowadays more controversial. An important factor is a healthy mixture of blended learning methods, which also use new technical possibilities. These include a multitude of e‑learning options and simulations, which partly enable situative learning in a "shielded" environment. An exemplary role model of the teacher and feedback for the person in training also remain core and sustainable aspects in medical further education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blended learning; Education, continuing; Feedback; Memory; Simulation training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28184954     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-017-0278-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  17 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  What I've learned from BMJ case reports: excellent learning points.

Authors:  Beverley Almeida
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.309

3.  Clinical teaching improves with resident evaluation and feedback.

Authors:  Keith Baker
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Mentoring programs for physicians in academic medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Deanne T Kashiwagi; Prathibha Varkey; David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The myth of teaching styles: What medical educators need to know [Editorial].

Authors:  Kenneth D Royal; Myrah R Stockdale
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2015 Apr-May       Impact factor: 1.697

6.  Dissemination of a simulation-based mastery learning intervention reduces central line-associated bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Barsuk; Elaine R Cohen; Steven Potts; Hany Demo; Shanu Gupta; Joe Feinglass; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Learning from stories--The Lancet's case reports.

Authors:  J Bignall; R Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Education in anesthesia: three years of online logbook implementation in an Italian school.

Authors:  Alberto Barbieri; Enrico Giuliani; Sara Lazzerotti; Matteo Villani; Alberto Farinetti
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Peyton's four-step approach: differential effects of single instructional steps on procedural and memory performance - a clarification study.

Authors:  Markus Krautter; Ronja Dittrich; Annette Safi; Justine Krautter; Imad Maatouk; Andreas Moeltner; Wolfgang Herzog; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-05-27

10.  The Learning Styles Myth is Thriving in Higher Education.

Authors:  Philip M Newton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  Preferences of the medical faculty members for electronic faculty development programs (e-FDP): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sara Heydari; Peyman Adibi; Athar Omid; Nikoo Yamani
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-07-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.