Literature DB >> 28183854

Linguistic Isolation and Access to the Active Kidney Transplant Waiting List in the United States.

Efrain Talamantes1, Keith C Norris2,3, Carol M Mangione3, Gerardo Moreno4, Amy D Waterman2,5, John D Peipert2,5, Suphamai Bunnapradist2,5, Edmund Huang6,5,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Waitlist inactivity is a barrier to transplantation, because inactive candidates cannot receive deceased donor organ offers. We hypothesized that temporarily inactive kidney transplant candidates living in linguistically isolated communities would be less likely to achieve active waitlist status. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We merged Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing data with five-digit zip code socioeconomic data from the 2000 US Census. The cumulative incidence of conversion to active waitlist status, death, and delisting before conversion among 84,783 temporarily inactive adult kidney candidates from 2004 to 2012 was determined using competing risks methods. Competing risks regression was performed to characterize the association between linguistic isolation, incomplete transplantation evaluation, and conversion to active status. A household was determined to be linguistically isolated if all members ≥14 years old speak a non-English language and also, speak English less than very well.
RESULTS: A total of 59,147 candidates (70% of the study population) achieved active status over the study period of 9.8 years. Median follow-up was 110 days (interquartile range, 42-276 days) for activated patients and 815 days (interquartile range, 361-1244 days) for candidates not activated. The cumulative incidence of activation over the study period was 74%, the cumulative incidence of death before conversion was 10%, and the cumulative incidence of delisting was 13%. After adjusting for other relevant covariates, living in a zip code with higher percentages of linguistically isolated households was associated with progressively lower subhazards of activation both in the overall population (reference: <1% linguistically isolated households; 1%-4.9% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.93; 5%-9.9% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.87; 10%-19.9% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.80; and ≥20% linguistically isolated: subhazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.76) and among candidates designated temporarily inactive due to an incomplete transplant evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that candidates residing in linguistically isolated communities are less likely to complete candidate evaluations and achieve active waitlist status.
Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethnicity; kidney transplantation; language; race; waitlist

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28183854      PMCID: PMC5338711          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07150716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   10.614


  32 in total

1.  Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Mark P Doescher; Barry G Saver
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Neighborhood poverty and kidney transplantation among US Asians and Pacific Islanders with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Y N Hall; A M O'Hare; B A Young; E J Boyko; G M Chertow
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: kidney.

Authors:  A J Matas; J M Smith; M A Skeans; B Thompson; S K Gustafson; D E Stewart; W S Cherikh; J L Wainright; G Boyle; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Assessing Transplant Education Practices in Dialysis Centers: Comparing Educator Reported and Medicare Data.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Christina J Goalby; Katrina M Dinkel; Huiling Xiao; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Access to renal transplantation among American Indians and Hispanics.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Andrew S Narva; Sharon K Stiles; Shelley K Karp; Alan Cass; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Trends in the inactive kidney transplant waitlist and implications for candidate survival.

Authors:  M E Grams; A B Massie; J D Schold; B P Chen; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Dialysis facility and network factors associated with low kidney transplantation rates among United States dialysis facilities.

Authors:  R E Patzer; L Plantinga; J Krisher; S O Pastan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 8.  Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Leah S Karliner; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Alice Hm Chen; Sunita Mutha
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Korean women: breast cancer knowledge, attitudes and behaviors.

Authors:  G R Sadler; L T Ryujin; C M Ko; E Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2001-08-13       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The RaDIANT community study protocol: community-based participatory research for reducing disparities in access to kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Rachel E Patzer; Jennifer Gander; Leighann Sauls; M Ahinee Amamoo; Jenna Krisher; Laura L Mulloy; Eric Gibney; Teri Browne; Laura Plantinga; Stephen O Pastan
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.388

View more
  6 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Barriers to Kidney Transplant Evaluation among Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Derek Jones; Zhiying You; Jessica B Kendrick
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.754

2.  Limited health literacy and adverse outcomes among kidney transplant candidates.

Authors:  Fatima Warsame; Christine E Haugen; Hao Ying; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Niraj M Desai; Rasheeda K Hall; Rekha Kambhampati; Deidra C Crews; Tanjala S Purnell; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Education Strategies in Dialysis Centers Associated With Increased Transplant Wait-listing Rates.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Huiling Xiao; Christina J Goalby; Satoru Kawakita; Yujie Cui; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.385

4.  Expanded Prospective Payment System and Use of and Outcomes with Home Dialysis by Race and Ethnicity in the United States.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Kevin F Erickson; Lucia Chen; Sitaram Vangala; Lynn Leng; Anuja Shah; Anjali B Saxena; Jeffrey Perl; Keith C Norris
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 10.614

5.  Linguistic Isolation and Mortality in Older Mexican Americans: Findings from the Hispanic Established Populations Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly.

Authors:  Donglan Zhang; Janani Rajbhandari-Thapa; Saswat Panda; Zhuo Chen; Lu Shi; Yan Li; Ye Shen; Ramesh Ghimire; Kerstin Gerst Emerson
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-06-01

6.  Socioeconomic Factors and Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Initiation of Home Dialysis.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Lucia Chen; Sitaram Vangala; Lynn Leng; Anuja Shah; Anjali B Saxena; Jeffrey Perl; Keith C Norris
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2020-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.