Literature DB >> 28182805

Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions.

Ndidi I Unaka1, Angela Statile1, Julianne Haney1, Andrew F Beck1,2, Patrick W Brady1,3, Karen E Jerardi1.   

Abstract

The average American adult reads at an 8th-grade level. Discharge instructions written above this level might increase the risk of adverse outcomes for children as they transition from hospital to home. We conducted a cross-sectional study at a large urban academic children's hospital to describe readability levels, understandability scores, and completeness of written instructions given to families at hospital discharge. Two hundred charts for patients discharged from the hospital medicine service were randomly selected for review. Written discharge instructions were extracted and scored for readability (Fry Readability Scale [FRS]), understandability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [PEMAT]), and completeness (5 criteria determined by consensus). Descriptive statistics enumerated the distribution of readability, understandability, and completeness of written discharge instructions. Of the patients included in the study, 51% were publicly insured. Median age was 3.1 years, and median length of stay was 2.0 days. The median readability score corresponded to a 10th-grade reading level (interquartile range, 8-12; range, 1-13). Median PEMAT score was 73% (interquartile range, 64%-82%; range, 45%-100%); 36% of instructions scored below 70%, correlating with suboptimal understandability. The diagnosis was described in only 33% of the instructions. Although explicit warning signs were listed in most instructions, 38% of the instructions did not include information on the person to contact if warning signs developed. Overall, the readability, understandability, and completeness of discharge instructions were subpar. Efforts to improve the content of discharge instructions may promote safe and effective transitions home. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:98-101.
© 2017 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28182805      PMCID: PMC6327837          DOI: 10.12788/jhm.2688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  8 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?

Authors:  M Daniel Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Interrater reliability of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).

Authors:  Julia Vishnevetsky; Chasity Burrows Walters; Kay See Tan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-09-06

3.  A Heuristic Evaluation to Assess Use of After Visit Summaries for Supporting Continuity of Care.

Authors:  Patrice Tremoulet; Ramya Krishnan; Dean Karavite; Naveen Muthu; Susan Harkness Regli; Amy Will; Jeremy Michel
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Disparity in Nurse Discharge Communication for Hospitalized Families Based on English Proficiency.

Authors:  Angela Y Choe; Joanna E Thomson; Ndidi I Unaka; Vanessa Wagner; Michelle Durling; Dianna Moeller; Emelia Ampomah; Colleen Mangeot; Amanda C Schondelmeyer
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-02

5.  Patients' ability to read and understand dosing instructions of their own medicines - a cross sectional study in a hospital and community pharmacy setting.

Authors:  M G C A Manchanayake; G R W S K Bandara; N R Samaranayake
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Alice Man; Courtney van Ballegooie
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2022-03-16

7.  What is the quality of drug safety information for patients: An analysis of REMS educational materials.

Authors:  Hilda W Chan; Andrea M Russell; Meredith Y Smith
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Improved readability and functions needed for mHealth apps targeting patients with heart failure: An app store review.

Authors:  Karen Dunn Lopez; Sena Chae; Girgis Michele; Dan Fraczkowski; Pantea Habibi; Debaleena Chattopadhyay; Sara B Donevant
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.