Literature DB >> 28182483

Characterization of vocalizations emitted in isolation by California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) pups throughout the postnatal period.

Sarah A Johnson1, Michele S Painter1, Angela B Javurek1, Claire R Murphy1, Emily C Howald1, Zoya Z Khan1, Caroline M Conard1, Kristal L Gant1, Mark R Ellersieck2, Frauke Hoffmann3, A Katrin Schenk4, Cheryl S Rosenfeld5.   

Abstract

Rodent species, such as monogamous and biparental California mice, produce vocalizations as a means of communication. A temporal examination of vocalizations produced by California mice pups in isolation was performed. Pup recordings were performed for 3 min at ∼10.00 and 14.00 hrs on early postnatal days (PND) 2-4, 7, 21, and 28. Once initial recordings were finished, pups were returned to the home cage with parents and any siblings for 5 minutes to determine if active biparental responses resulted in an enhanced vocalization response when pups were isolated and retested. We also sought to determine whether potential reduction in vocalizations by older pups might be due to procedure-habituation procedure associated with less anxiety and/or possibly decreased need for parental care. Vocalizations were measured in weanling (30 days of age) "naïve" pups not previously isolated. Results show older pups took significantly longer to vocalize, indicated by increased latency before producing their initial syllable compared to earlier ages. With increasing age, pups demonstrated decreased syllable duration, reduced number and duration of phrases, and decreased number of syllables per phrase. No differences in pup vocalizations were observed before and after being placed back with parents, suggestive biparental potentiation may not exist in California mice pups. Comparison of the naïve to habituated weanling pups indicated the former group had more total calls but no other differences in vocalization parameters were detected between these 2 groups. Collectively, the findings suggest that as California mice pups mature and approach weaning they generally vocalize less in isolation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28182483      PMCID: PMC5310764          DOI: 10.1037/com0000057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  44 in total

1.  Behavioral mechanisms for active maternal potentiation of isolation calling in rat pups.

Authors:  M A Hofer; J R Masmela; S A Brunelli; H N Shair
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Vocal and locomotor responses of piglets to social isolation and reunion.

Authors:  Valentina Colonnello; Paolo Iacobucci; Ruth C Newberry
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  Sexual dimorphism in ultrasonic vocalizations of mice (Mus musculus): gonadal hormone regulation.

Authors:  J Nyby; G Dizinno; G Whitney
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1977-12

4.  Do pup ultrasonic cries provoke prolactin secretion in lactating rats?

Authors:  J M Stern; D A Thomas; J Rabii; R J Barfield
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Brief maternal interaction increases number, amplitude, and bout size of isolation-induced ultrasonic vocalizations in infant rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Michael M Myers; Nyron Ali; Aron Weller; Susan A Brunelli; Andrea Y Tu; Myron A Hofer; Harry N Shair
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Hypothermic vocalizations of rat pups (Rattus norvegicus) elicit and direct maternal search behavior.

Authors:  S A Brunelli; H N Shair; M A Hofer
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Production of ultrasonic vocalizations by Peromyscus mice in the wild.

Authors:  Matina C Kalcounis-Rueppell; Maarten J Vonhof; Jackie D Metheny
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Disruption of parenting behaviors in california mice, a monogamous rodent species, by endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Angela B Javurek; Michele S Painter; Michael P Peritore; Mark R Ellersieck; R Michael Roberts; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Displays of paternal mouse pup retrieval following communicative interaction with maternal mates.

Authors:  Hong-Xiang Liu; Olga Lopatina; Chiharu Higashida; Hiroko Fujimoto; Shirin Akther; Alena Inzhutova; Mingkun Liang; Jing Zhong; Takahiro Tsuji; Toru Yoshihara; Kohei Sumi; Mizuho Ishiyama; Wen-Jie Ma; Mitsunori Ozaki; Satoshi Yagitani; Shigeru Yokoyama; Naofumi Mukaida; Takeshi Sakurai; Osamu Hori; Katsuji Yoshioka; Atsushi Hirao; Yukio Kato; Katsuhiko Ishihara; Ichiro Kato; Hiroshi Okamoto; Stanislav M Cherepanov; Alla B Salmina; Hirokazu Hirai; Masahide Asano; David A Brown; Isamu Nagano; Haruhiro Higashida
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Vocal ontogeny in neotropical singing mice (Scotinomys).

Authors:  Polly Campbell; Bret Pasch; Ashley L Warren; Steven M Phelps
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Early genistein exposure of California mice and effects on the gut microbiota-brain axis.

Authors:  Brittney L Marshall; Yang Liu; Michelle J Farrington; Jiude Mao; William G Helferich; A Katrin Schenk; Nathan J Bivens; Saurav J Sarma; Zhentian Lei; Lloyd W Sumner; Trupti Joshi; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Mechanisms of sound production in deer mice (Peromyscus spp.).

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Anastasiya Kobrina; Landon Bone; Tarana Darwaiz; Bret Pasch
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.308

3.  Endocrine disruption of gene expression and microRNA profiles in hippocampus and hypothalamus of California mice: Association of gene expression changes with behavioural outcomes.

Authors:  Mary C Butler; Camryn N Long; Jessica A Kinkade; Madison T Green; Rachel E Martin; Brittney L Marshall; Tess E Willemse; A Katrin Schenk; Jiude Mao; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.627

4.  Multigenerational effects of bisphenol A or ethinyl estradiol exposure on F2 California mice (Peromyscus californicus) pup vocalizations.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Michelle J Farrington; Claire R Murphy; Paul D Caldo; Leif A McAllister; Sarabjit Kaur; Catherine Chun; Madison T Ortega; Brittney L Marshall; Frauke Hoffmann; Mark R Ellersieck; A Katrin Schenk; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Maturation of Social-Vocal Communication in Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) Pups.

Authors:  Megan R Warren; Drayson Campbell; Amélie M Borie; Charles L Ford; Ammar M Dharani; Larry J Young; Robert C Liu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Enriched laboratory housing increases sensitivity to social stress in female California mice (Peromyscus californicus).

Authors:  Vanessa A Minie; Radmila Petric; Stephanie Ramos-Maciel; Emily C Wright; Brian C Trainor; Natalia Duque-Wilckens
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.569

7.  Rapid development of mature vocal patterns of ultrasonic calls in a fast-growing rodent, the yellow steppe lemming (Eolagurus luteus).

Authors:  Daria D Yurlova; Ilya A Volodin; Olga G Ilchenko; Elena V Volodina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.