| Literature DB >> 28181839 |
Zhengwei Huang1, Han Wu1, Beibei Yang2, Longkai Chen1, Ying Huang1, Guilan Quan1, Chune Zhu1, Xing Li1, Xin Pan1, Chuanbin Wu1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a novel anhydrous reverse micelle nanoparticles (ARM-NPs) system to overcome the sedimentation instability of peptide-containing pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). A bottom-up method was utilized to fabricate ARM-NPs. Tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA)/water system, freeze-drying and lipid inversion method were successively used to produce the ARM-NPs for pMDI. Various characteristics of ARM-NPs were investigated including particle size, morphology, secondary structure of the peptide drug, aerosolization properties and storage stability. As revealed by the results, ARM-NPs with spherical shape possessed 147.7 ± 2.0 nm of particle size with 0.152 ± 0.021 PdI. The ARM-NPs for pMDI had satisfactory fine particle fraction (FPF) value of 46.99 ± 1.33%, while the secondary structure of the peptide drug was unchanged. Stability tests showed no pronounced sedimentation instability for over 12 weeks at 4-6 °C. Furthermore, a hypothesis was raised to explain the formation mechanism of ARM-NPs, which was verified by the differential scanning calorimetry analysis. The lecithin employed in the reverse micelle vesicles could serve as a steric barrier between peptide drugs and bulk propellant, which prevented the instability of peptide drugs in hydrophobic environment. Homogenous particle size could avoid Ostwald ripening phenomenon of particles in pMDIs. It was concluded that the ARM-NPs for pMDI could successfully overcome sedimentation instability by the steric barrier effect and homogeneous particle size.Entities:
Keywords: Pressurized metered dose inhaler; anhydrous reverse micelle nanoparticle; homogenous particle size; sedimentation instability; steric barrier effect
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28181839 PMCID: PMC8241067 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2016.1269850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
The TBA volume and lecithin concentration in each formulation and the detected particle size and PdI of the obtained original lipid vesicles.
| Formulation | TBA volume (μL) | Lecithin concentration (%, w/v) | Particle size (nm) | PdI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 150 | 5 | 174.8 | 0.290 |
| 2 | 200 | 5 | 161.9 | 0.202 |
| 3 | 250 | 5 | 145.5 | 0.084 |
| 4 | 150 | 10 | 241.9 | 0.360 |
| 5 | 200 | 10 | 176.5 | 0.244 |
| 6 | 250 | 10 | 166.0 | 0.138 |
| 7 | 150 | 20 | 266.2 | 0.375 |
| 8 | 200 | 20 | 206.1 | 0.267 |
| 9 | 250 | 20 | 177.9 | 0.264 |
Results of estimated marginal means of the particle size and PdI.
| 95% Confidence interval | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Formulation compositionc | Mean | Std. error | Lower bound | Upper bound | |
| Particle size | TBA volume (μL) | |||||
| 150 | 227.6 | 10.2 | 199.2 | 256.1 | ||
| 200 | 181.5 | 10.2 | 153.1 | 209.9 | ||
| 250 | 163.1 | 10.2 | 134.7 | 191.6 | ||
| Lecithin concentration (%) | ||||||
| 5 | 160.7 | 10.2 | 132.3 | 189.2 | ||
| 10 | 194.8 | 10.2 | 166.4 | 223.2 | ||
| 20 | 216.7 | 10.2 | 188.3 | 245.1 | ||
| PdI | TBA volume (μL) | |||||
| 150 | 0.342 | 0.021 | 0.285 | 0.399 | ||
| 200 | 0.239 | 0.021 | 0.182 | 0.296 | ||
| 250 | 0.162 | 0.021 | 0.105 | 0.219 | ||
| Lecithin concentration (%) | ||||||
| 5 | 0.192 | 0.021 | 0.135 | 0.249 | ||
| 10 | 0.248 | 0.021 | 0.191 | 0.305 | ||
| 20 | 0.303 | 0.021 | 0.246 | 0.360 | ||
Figure 1.Effect of stirring rate on the vesicle size (A) and PdI (B) of original lipid vesicles. Data represent mean (± SD) of three preparations, *p < 0.05 with each group.
Figure 2.TEM micrographs of the samples: (A) Original lipid vesicles; (B) ARM-NPs; (C) reconstructed liposomes.
The particle size and PdI of original lipid vesicles, ARM-NPs and reconstructed liposomes.
| Sample | Particle size (nm) | PdI |
|---|---|---|
| Original lipid vesicles | 151.1 ± 1.0 | 0.119 ± 0.013 |
| ARM-NPs | 147.7 ± 2.0 | 0.152 ± 0.021 |
| Reconstructed liposomes | 181.0 ± 4.9 | 0.102 ± 0.029 |
Figure 3.FT-IR and CD results. (A) Comparison of FT-IR spectra: lyophilized complexes, pure sCT, atomized sCT from pMDIs and freeze-dried free sCT; (B) Fitting curves of sCT amide I band of pure sCT; (C) Fitting curves of sCT amide I band of freeze-dried free sCT; (D) Fitting curves of sCT amide I band of atomized sCT from pMDIs; (E) Comparison of sCT CD spectra under different conditions: aqueous solutions of SCT with SDS, pure sCT, atomized sCT from pMDIs and the lyophilized complexes.
Figure 4.Results of formulation characterization and stability evaluation. (A) The aerosolization properties of the optimized sCT-containing ARM-NPs for pMDIs formulation. Data represent mean (± SD) of three preparations; (B) The aerosolization properties of the optimized sCT-containing ARM-NPs for pMDIs formulation 12-week during storage under 4–6 °C condition. Data represent mean (± SD) of three preparations; (C) Content of drug per press during 12-week storage under 4–6 °C condition. Data represent mean (± SD) of three preparations.
Characterization of particle size and PdI of sCT containing pMDIs during 10-day storage under different conditions: 4, 20 and 30 °C.
| Particle size (nm) | PdI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | Day 0 | Day 5 | Day 10 | Day 0 | Day 5 | Day 10 |
| 4 | 160.4 ± 6.6 | 164.9 ± 5.2 | 164.2 ± 9.1 | 0.024 ± 0.002 | 0.102 ± 0.023 | 0.171 ± 0.015 |
| 20 | 147.3 ± 0.4 | 152.9 ± 9.0 | 150.9 ± 5.5 | 0.051 ± 0.005 | 0.178 ± 0.014 | 0.107 ± 0.011 |
| 30 | 165.1 ± 0.5 | 163.4 ± 6.0 | 169.9 ± 9.3 | 0.065 ± 0.018 | 0.160 ± 0.028 | 0.176 ± 0.023 |
Figure 5.DSC thermograms of TBA/water 1:4, TBA/water 1:4 + lecithin, lipid vesicle suspension, TBA/water 3:2 and TBA/water 3:2 + lecithin.
The four kinds of frozen crystallization behavior of TBA/water system.
| Type | TBA% (w/w) | Phase I (high temperature) | Phase II (moderate temperature) | Phase III (low temperature) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0–20 | l.s. | Ice + l.s. | Ice + eutectic A |
| B | 20–70 | l.s. | TBA hydrate + l.s. | TBA hydrate + eutectic A |
| C | 70–90 | l.s. | TBA hydrate + l.s. | TBA hydrate + eutectic B |
| D | 90–100 | l.s. | TBA + l.s. | TBA + eutectic B |
Note: l.s., liquid solution.
Figure 6.The schematic diagram about the forming process of ARM-NPs. (A) The TBA/water 1:4 system; (B) the TBA/water 3:2 system; (1) before freeze-drying; (2) during freeze-drying; (3) after adding ethanol absolute. Larger balls without tails and smaller balls with tails represented sCT and lecithin, respectively. A1, A2, B1 and B2 referred to aqueous environment while A3 and B3 depicted the addition of ethanol absolute.