Background: Quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis is widely used as a surveillance method for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients. However, no CMV DNA threshold exists in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to differentiate pneumonia from pulmonary shedding. Methods: We tested archived BAL fluid samples from 132 HCT recipients with CMV pneumonia and 139 controls (100 patients with non-CMV pneumonia, 18 with idiopathic pneumonia syndrome [IPS], and 21 who were asymptomatic) by quantitative CMV and β-globin DNA-specific PCR. Results: Patients with CMV pneumonia had higher median viral loads (3.9 log10 IU/mL; interquartile range [IQR], 2.6-6.0 log10 IU/mL) than controls (0 log10 IU/mL [IQR, 0-1.6 log10 IU/mL] for patients with non-CMV pneumonia, 0 log10 IU/mL [IQR, 0-1.6 log10 IU/mL] for patients with IPS, and 1.63 log10 IU/mL [IQR, 0-2.5 log10 IU/mL] for patients who were asymptomatic; P < .001 for all comparisons to patients with CMV pneumonia). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and predictive models identified a cutoff CMV DNA level of 500 IU/mL to differentiate between CMV pneumonia and pulmonary shedding, using current CMV pneumonia prevalence figures. However, different levels may be appropriate in settings of very high or low CMV pneumonia prevalence. The presence of pulmonary copathogens, radiographic presentation, or pulmonary hemorrhage did not alter predictive values. Conclusion: CMV DNA load in BAL can be used to differentiate CMV pneumonia from pulmonary shedding.
Background: Quantitative cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis is widely used as a surveillance method for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients. However, no CMV DNA threshold exists in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to differentiate pneumonia from pulmonary shedding. Methods: We tested archived BAL fluid samples from 132 HCT recipients with CMV pneumonia and 139 controls (100 patients with non-CMV pneumonia, 18 with idiopathic pneumonia syndrome [IPS], and 21 who were asymptomatic) by quantitative CMV and β-globin DNA-specific PCR. Results: Patients with CMV pneumonia had higher median viral loads (3.9 log10 IU/mL; interquartile range [IQR], 2.6-6.0 log10 IU/mL) than controls (0 log10 IU/mL [IQR, 0-1.6 log10 IU/mL] for patients with non-CMV pneumonia, 0 log10 IU/mL [IQR, 0-1.6 log10 IU/mL] for patients with IPS, and 1.63 log10 IU/mL [IQR, 0-2.5 log10 IU/mL] for patients who were asymptomatic; P < .001 for all comparisons to patients with CMV pneumonia). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and predictive models identified a cutoff CMV DNA level of 500 IU/mL to differentiate between CMV pneumonia and pulmonary shedding, using current CMV pneumonia prevalence figures. However, different levels may be appropriate in settings of very high or low CMV pneumonia prevalence. The presence of pulmonary copathogens, radiographic presentation, or pulmonary hemorrhage did not alter predictive values. Conclusion: CMV DNA load in BAL can be used to differentiate CMV pneumonia from pulmonary shedding.
Authors: Michael Boeckh; MeeiLi Huang; James Ferrenberg; Terry Stevens-Ayers; Laurence Stensland; W Garrett Nichols; Lawrence Corey Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Alfred Lennart Bissinger; Hermann Einsele; Klaus Hamprecht; Ulricke Schumacher; Reinhard Kandolf; Juergen Loeffler; Christian Aepinus; Thomas Bock; Gerhard Jahn; Holger Hebart Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: E Fréalle; K Decrucq; F Botterel; B Bouchindhomme; D Camus; E Dei-Cas; J M Costa; I Yakoub-Agha; S Bretagne; L Delhaes Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Francisco M Marty; Drew J Winston; Scott D Rowley; Estil Vance; Genovefa A Papanicolaou; Kathleen M Mullane; Thomas M Brundage; Alice T Robertson; Susan Godkin; Hervé Momméja-Marin; Michael Boeckh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christian Renaud; Hu Xie; Sachiko Seo; Jane Kuypers; Anne Cent; Lawrence Corey; Wendy Leisenring; Michael Boeckh; Janet A Englund Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Raymund R Razonable; Naoki Inoue; Swetha G Pinninti; Suresh B Boppana; Tiziana Lazzarotto; Liliana Gabrielli; Giuliana Simonazzi; Philip E Pellett; D Scott Schmid Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Madeleine R Heldman; Jimmy Ma; Jordan Gauthier; Riley A O'Hara; Andrew J Cowan; Leah M Yoke; Lisa So; Elizabeth Gulleen; Elizabeth R Duke; Catherine Liu; Cameron J Turtle; Joshua A Hill Journal: J Immunother Date: 2021 Nov-Dec 01 Impact factor: 4.912
Authors: I P Lodding; C da Cunha Bang; S S Sørensen; F Gustafsson; M Iversen; N Kirkby; M Perch; A Rasmussen; H Sengeløv; A Mocroft; J D Lundgren Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 3.835