Deepa Japp1, Anoop Shah2, Sheila Fisken3, Martin Denvir4, Susan Shenkin5, Alan Japp4. 1. Medicine of the Elderly, Western General Hospital Ringgold Standard Institution, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. 2. Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh Ringgold Standard Institution, Edinburgh, UK. 3. Information Services, University of Edinburgh Ringgold Standard Institution, Edinburgh, UK. 4. Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Ringgold Standard Institution , Edinburgh, UK. 5. Centre for Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh Ringgold Standard institution, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve outcomes in several populations of patients with heart failure (HF), but there has been no systematic review of MRAs in older patients. Objectives: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of MRA treatment in elderly HF patients. Data Sources: Trials were identified through a literature search until 24 January 2015. Study Selection: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of MRAs in patients with HF and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction aged ≥65 years, with subgroup analysis of patients ≥65 years or with mean participant age ≥70 years. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Efficacy outcomes were mortality, hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes, symptom status or functional capacity. Safety outcomes were hyperkalaemia and renal dysfunction. Data were analysed using relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Relative risk ratios were pooled where more than three estimates were available. Results: Seven RCTs were included (total n = 8,638). Three RCTs in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HEFREF) reported overall benefit from MRA therapy with no significant treatment interaction for age; the effects of MRAs on mortality in patients ≥75 years displayed marked inter-study heterogeneity. In four RCTs of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HEFPEF), MRA treatment had no significant effect on any efficacy outcome. Conclusion: MRAs improve clinical outcomes in selected cohorts of older patients with HEFREF but not HEFPEF. In patients ≥75 years with HEFREF, the effect of MRA treatment on overall mortality is uncertain. Further study is required in subgroups of elderly patients with both HEFREF and HEFPEF.
Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve outcomes in several populations of patients with heart failure (HF), but there has been no systematic review of MRAs in older patients. Objectives: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of MRA treatment in elderly HF patients. Data Sources: Trials were identified through a literature search until 24 January 2015. Study Selection: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of MRAs in patients with HF and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction aged ≥65 years, with subgroup analysis of patients ≥65 years or with mean participant age ≥70 years. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Efficacy outcomes were mortality, hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes, symptom status or functional capacity. Safety outcomes were hyperkalaemia and renal dysfunction. Data were analysed using relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Relative risk ratios were pooled where more than three estimates were available. Results: Seven RCTs were included (total n = 8,638). Three RCTs in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HEFREF) reported overall benefit from MRA therapy with no significant treatment interaction for age; the effects of MRAs on mortality in patients ≥75 years displayed marked inter-study heterogeneity. In four RCTs of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HEFPEF), MRA treatment had no significant effect on any efficacy outcome. Conclusion: MRAs improve clinical outcomes in selected cohorts of older patients with HEFREF but not HEFPEF. In patients ≥75 years with HEFREF, the effect of MRA treatment on overall mortality is uncertain. Further study is required in subgroups of elderly patients with both HEFREF and HEFPEF.
Authors: Frederique J Hafkamp; Rene A Tio; Luuk C Otterspoor; Tineke de Greef; Gijs J van Steenbergen; Arjen R T van de Ven; Geert Smits; Hans Post; Dennis van Veghel Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 4.654