Literature DB >> 28181479

Multi-atlas attenuation correction supports full quantification of static and dynamic brain PET data in PET-MR.

Inés Mérida1, Anthonin Reilhac, Jérôme Redouté, Rolf A Heckemann, Nicolas Costes, Alexander Hammers.   

Abstract

In simultaneous PET-MR, attenuation maps are not directly available. Essential for absolute radioactivity quantification, they need to be derived from MR or PET data to correct for gamma photon attenuation by the imaged object. We evaluate a multi-atlas attenuation correction method for brain imaging (MaxProb) on static [18F]FDG PET and, for the first time, on dynamic PET, using the serotoninergic tracer [18F]MPPF. A database of 40 MR/CT image pairs (atlases) was used. The MaxProb method synthesises subject-specific pseudo-CTs by registering each atlas to the target subject space. Atlas CT intensities are then fused via label propagation and majority voting. Here, we compared these pseudo-CTs with the real CTs in a leave-one-out design, contrasting the MaxProb approach with a simplified single-atlas method (SingleAtlas). We evaluated the impact of pseudo-CT accuracy on reconstructed PET images, compared to PET data reconstructed with real CT, at the regional and voxel levels for the following: radioactivity images; time-activity curves; and kinetic parameters (non-displaceable binding potential, BPND). On static [18F]FDG, the mean bias for MaxProb ranged between 0 and 1% for 73 out of 84 regions assessed, and exceptionally peaked at 2.5% for only one region. Statistical parametric map analysis of MaxProb-corrected PET data showed significant differences in less than 0.02% of the brain volume, whereas SingleAtlas-corrected data showed significant differences in 20% of the brain volume. On dynamic [18F]MPPF, most regional errors on BPND ranged from -1 to  +3% (maximum bias 5%) for the MaxProb method. With SingleAtlas, errors were larger and had higher variability in most regions. PET quantification bias increased over the duration of the dynamic scan for SingleAtlas, but not for MaxProb. We show that this effect is due to the interaction of the spatial tracer-distribution heterogeneity variation over time with the degree of accuracy of the attenuation maps. This work demonstrates that inaccuracies in attenuation maps can induce bias in dynamic brain PET studies. Multi-atlas attenuation correction with MaxProb enables quantification on hybrid PET-MR scanners, eschewing the need for CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28181479     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5f6c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Brain PET Poster Sessions PP01-M01 to PP02-N07.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Predicting 15O-Water PET cerebral blood flow maps from multi-contrast MRI using a deep convolutional neural network with evaluation of training cohort bias.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Enhao Gong; Audrey P Fan; Maged Goubran; Mohammad M Khalighi; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Impact of non-uniform attenuation correction in a dynamic [18F]-FDOPA brain PET/MRI study.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Mihai Avram; Felix Brandl; Mona Mustafa; Martin Scherr; Claudia Leucht; Stefan Leucht; Christian Sorg; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Accuracy and precision of zero-echo-time, single- and multi-atlas attenuation correction for dynamic [11C]PE2I PET-MR brain imaging.

Authors:  João M Sousa; Lieuwe Appel; Inés Merida; Rolf A Heckemann; Nicolas Costes; Mathias Engström; Stergios Papadimitriou; Dag Nyholm; Håkan Ahlström; Alexander Hammers; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-12-28

5.  Evaluation of zero-echo-time attenuation correction for integrated PET/MR brain imaging-comparison to head atlas and 68Ge-transmission-based attenuation correction.

Authors:  João M Sousa; Lieuwe Appel; Mathias Engström; Stergios Papadimitriou; Dag Nyholm; Elna-Marie Larsson; Håkan Ahlström; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-10-22

6.  Practical issues and limitations of brain attenuation correction on a simultaneous PET-MR scanner.

Authors:  J E Mackewn; J Stirling; S Jeljeli; S-M Gould; R I Johnstone; I Merida; L C Pike; C J McGinnity; K Beck; O Howes; A Hammers; P K Marsden
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-05

7.  Attenuation Correction Approaches for Serotonin Transporter Quantification With PET/MRI.

Authors:  Lucas Rischka; Gregor Gryglewski; Neydher Berroterán-Infante; Ivo Rausch; Gregory Miles James; Manfred Klöbl; Helen Sigurdardottir; Markus Hartenbach; Andreas Hahn; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Mitterhauser; Thomas Beyer; Siegfried Kasper; Daniela Prayer; Marcus Hacker; Rupert Lanzenberger
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Metal artifact correction strategies in MRI-based attenuation correction in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Georg Schramm; Claes Nøhr Ladefoged
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-11-14

9.  CERMEP-IDB-MRXFDG: a database of 37 normal adult human brain [18F]FDG PET, T1 and FLAIR MRI, and CT images available for research.

Authors:  Inés Mérida; Julien Jung; Alexander Hammers; Nicolas Costes; Sandrine Bouvard; Didier Le Bars; Sophie Lancelot; Franck Lavenne; Caroline Bouillot; Jérôme Redouté
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  Deep-learning-based attenuation correction in dynamic [15O]H2O studies using PET/MRI in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Oriol Puig; Otto M Henriksen; Flemming L Andersen; Ulrich Lindberg; Liselotte Højgaard; Ian Law; Claes N Ladefoged
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.