| Literature DB >> 28181388 |
Ariel C Zane1, David A Reiter2, Michelle Shardell1, Donnie Cameron1, Eleanor M Simonsick1, Kenneth W Fishbein2, Stephanie A Studenski1, Richard G Spencer2, Luigi Ferrucci1.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity declines with age and negatively affects walking performance, but the mechanism for this association is not fully clear. We tested the hypothesis that impaired oxidative capacity affects muscle performance and, through this mechanism, has a negative effect on walking speed. Muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity was measured by in vivo phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the postexercise phosphocreatine resynthesis rate, kPCr , in 326 participants (154 men), aged 24-97 years (mean 71), in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Muscle strength and quality were determined by knee extension isokinetic strength, and the ratio of knee extension strength to thigh muscle cross-sectional area derived from computed topography, respectively. Four walking tasks were evaluated: a usual pace over 6 m and for 150 s, and a rapid pace over 6 m and 400 m. In multivariate linear regression analyses, kPCr was associated with muscle strength (β = 0.140, P = 0.007) and muscle quality (β = 0.127, P = 0.022), independent of age, sex, height, and weight; muscle strength was also a significant independent correlate of walking speed (P < 0.02 for all tasks) and in a formal mediation analysis significantly attenuated the association between kPCr and three of four walking tasks (18-29% reduction in β for kPCr ). This is the first demonstration in human adults that mitochondrial function affects muscle strength and that inefficiency in muscle bioenergetics partially accounts for differences in mobility through this mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990in vivozzm321990; 31P MRS; bioenergetics; muscle strength; skeletal muscle; walking speed
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28181388 PMCID: PMC5418194 DOI: 10.1111/acel.12568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Cell ISSN: 1474-9718 Impact factor: 9.304
Figure 1Age versus muscle strength stratified by age‐specific muscle strength tertiles, for 326 participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.
Distribution of selected characteristics of the 326 participants from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, according to age‐adjusted muscle strength tertile [given as mean (SD)]
| Characteristic | Muscle strength tertiles (N·m, 30° per s) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Middle | High | |||
|
| 111 | 106 | 109 | ||
| Age (years) | 326 | 71.63 (12.98) | 71.74 (12.59) | 70.75 (12.26) | 0.820 |
| Sex (female) | 326 | 96 (86%) | 57 (54%) | 19 (17%) | <0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 326 | 161.17 (8.54) | 168.22 (7.92) | 173.30 (7.97) | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 326 | 68.20 (15.29) | 75.48 (14.10) | 82.96 (12.43) | <0.001 |
| kPCr (per s) | 326 | 0.019 (0.006) | 0.020 (0.007) | 0.021 (0.006) | 0.036 |
| % PCr depletion | 326 | 34.69 (10.05) | 36.66 (11.41) | 41.58 (11.60) | <0.001 |
| Thigh muscle cross‐sectional area (cm2) | 326 | 85.77 (23.48) | 102.27 (27.46) | 125.91 (26.40) | <0.001 |
| Usual gait speed, UGS‐6m (m s−1) | 316 | 1.16 (0.19) | 1.22 (0.21) | 1.24 (0.21) | 0.009 |
| Usual gait speed, UGS‐150m (m s−1) | 316 | 1.20 (0.14) | 1.22 (0.16) | 1.26 (0.15) | 0.009 |
| Rapid gait speed, UGS‐6m (m s−1) | 316 | 1.75 (0.28) | 1.85 (0.34) | 1.91 (0.37) | <0.001 |
| Rapid gait speed, UGS‐400m (m s−1) | 316 | 1.45 (0.20) | 1.49 (0.24) | 1.58 (0.25) | <0.001 |
Expressed as: median (IQR).
Fisher's exact test P‐value.
Adjusted for age and sex.
Jonckheere–Terpstra test P‐value.
Statistically significant
Linear regression models for kPCr rates predicting left thigh muscle cross‐sectional area, muscle strength, and muscle quality, adjusted for age, sex, height, and weight, and corrected for % PCr depletion. All coefficients are standardized
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Muscle area (cm2) | Muscle strength (N·m) | Muscle quality (N·m cm−2) | |||
| Adj. | 0.765 | 0.531 | 0.183 | |||
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| Age | −0.367 (−0.427, −0.306) | <0.001 | −0.313 (−0.398, −0.228) | <0.001 | −0.270 (−0.139, 0.085) | 0.633 |
| Sex | 0.543 (0.467, 0.619) | <0.001 | 0.326 (0.219, 0.433) | <0.001 | −0.188 (−0.330, −0.046) | 0.010 |
| Height (cm) | −0.098 (−0.190, −0.006) | 0.037 | 0.212 (0.082, 0.341) | 0.002 | 0.414 (0.243, 0.585) | <0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 0.430 (0.357, 0.504) | <0.001 | 0.066 (−0.037, 0.170) | 0.210 | −0.374 (−0.511, −0.238) | <0.001 |
| kPCr (per s) | 0.044 (−0.014, 0.102) | 0.141 | 0.114 (0.032, 0.197) | 0.007 | 0.127 (0.019, 0.236) | 0.022 |
| % PCr dep. | −0.005 (−0.061, 0.051) | 0.857 | 0.217 (0.138, 0.296) | <0.001 | 0.323 (0.219, 0.427) | <0.001 |
Statistically significant
Linear regression models (N = 316 for all) for each walking speed (WS) task, showing the association between muscle strength (MS) and walking speed (Model 1), and the effect of kPCr on walking speed, without (Model 2) and with (Model 3) accounting for muscle strength. All models are adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, and % PCr depletion, and all coefficients are standardized
| Parameters | Model 1: WS = MS | Model 2: WS = kPCr | Model 3: WS = kPCr + MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| Walking Speed = UGS‐6 m (m s−1) | ||||||
| Age | −0.278 (−0.396, −0.161) | <0.001 | −0.305 (−0.418, −0.192) | <0.001 | −0.251 (−0.371, −0.130) | <0.001 |
| kPCr (per s) | – | – | 0.122 (0.012, 0.232) | 0.030 | 0.102 (−0.009, 0.213) | 0.072 |
| % PCr depletion | – | – | 0.031 (−0.075, 0.136) | 0.568 | −0.008 (−0.118, 0.101) | 0.879 |
| Muscle strength, MS (N·m) | 0.180 (0.042, 0.319) | 0.011 | – | – | 0.175 (0.031, 0.320) | 0.018 |
| Walking Speed = UGS‐150s (m s−1) | ||||||
| Age | −0.148 (−0.270, −0.026) | 0.018 | −0.198 (−0.316, −0.080) | 0.001 | −0.118 (−0.243, 0.006) | 0.064 |
| kPCr (per s) | – | – | 0.140 (0.025, 0.255) | 0.018 | 0.110 (−0.004, 0.225) | 0.060 |
| % PCr depletion | – | – | 0.045 (−0.065, 0.155) | 0.424 | −0.012 (−0.126, 0.101) | 0.830 |
| Muscle strength, MS (N·m) | 0.261 (0.118, 0.405) | <0.001 | – | – | 0.257 (−0.107, 0.407) | 0.001 |
| Walking Speed = RGS‐6m (m s−1) | ||||||
| Age | −0.379 (−0.485, −0.273) | <0.001 | −0.440 (−0.543, −0.337) | <0.001 | −0.361 (−0.470, −0.252) | <0.001 |
| kPCr (per s) | – | – | 0.104 (0.003, 0.205) | 0.044 | 0.074 (−0.025, 0.174) | 0.145 |
| % PCr depletion | – | – | 0.088 (−0.009, 0.184) | 0.075 | 0.031 (−0.068, 0.129) | 0.544 |
| Muscle strength, MS (N·m) | 0.273 (0.149, 0.398) | <0.001 | – | – | 0.256 (0.126, 0.387) | <0.001 |
| Walking Speed = RGS‐400m (m s−1) | ||||||
| Age | −0.452 (−0.549, −0.355) | <0.001 | −0.510 (−0.605, −0.415) | <0.001 | −0.408 (−0.506, −0.310) | <0.001 |
| kPCr (per s) | – | – | 0.208 (0.115,0.301) | <0.001 | 0.170 (0.080, 0.259) | <0.001 |
| % PCr depletion | – | – | 0.094 (0.005, 0.183) | 0.039 | 0.020 (−0.069, 0.109) | 0.657 |
| Muscle strength, MS (N·m) | 0.350 (0.236, 0.465) | <0.001 | – | – | 0.330 (0.212, 0.447) | <0.001 |
Statistically significant
Figure 2Diagram illustrating: a) the demonstrated effect of k r on walking speeds (Choi et al., 2016), b) the effect of k r on muscle function, and c) the effect of k r on walking speeds, mediated by muscle function.