| Literature DB >> 28179960 |
Mohammed Makha1, Paolo Testa1, Surendra Babu Anantharaman1, Jakob Heier1, Sandra Jenatsch1, Nicolas Leclaire1, Jean-Nicolas Tisserant2, Anna C Véron1, Lei Wang1, Frank Nüesch3, Roland Hany1.
Abstract
Tinted and colour-neutral semitransparent organic photovoltaic elements are of interest for building-integrated applications in windows, on glass roofs or on facades. We demonstrate a semitransparent organic photovoltaic cell with a dry-laminated top electrode that achieves a uniform average visible transmittance of 51% and a power conversion efficiency of 3%. The photo-active material is based on a majority blend composed of a visibly absorbing donor polymer and a fullerene acceptor, to which a selective near-infrared absorbing cyanine dye is added as a minority component. Our results show that organic ternary blends are attractive for the fabrication of semitransparent solar cells in general, because a guest component with a complementary absorption can compensate for the inevitably reduced current generation capability of a high-performing binary blend when applied as a thin, semitransparent film.Entities:
Keywords: 101 Self-assembly / Self-organized materials; 209 Solar cell / Photovoltaics; 50 Energy materials; Organic photovoltaics; PCBM; lamination; ternary organic solar cells; transparent solar cell
Year: 2017 PMID: 28179960 PMCID: PMC5256242 DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2016.1261602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater ISSN: 1468-6996 Impact factor: 8.090
Performance data of glass/ITO/TiO2/PBDTTT-C:Cy7-T:PC70BM/MoO3(20 nm)/Ag(80 nm) solar cells.
| Entry | Ratio PBDTTT-C:Cy7-T:PC70BM (w/w/w) | Active film thickness (± 5 nm) | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | PCE | PCE average (%) | AVT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1:0:1.5 | 90 | 0.70 | 12 | 65 | 6.0 | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 56 |
| B | 1:0:1.5 | 60 | 0.68 | 7.4 | 54 | 3.0 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 69 |
| C | 1:0:1.5 | 30 | 0.69 | 5.4 | 52 | 2.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 75 |
| D | 0.7:0:1.5 | 83 | 0.69 | 8.7 | 71 | 4.7 | 4.5 ±0.2 | 66 |
| E | 0.7:0.3:1.5 | 95 | 0.71 | 10.4 | 68 | 5.5 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 65 |
| F | 0:1:2 | 0.71 | 4.1 | 38 | 1.1 |
The concentration of PC70BM was constant at 15 mg ml−1.
The light intensity was 91 mW cm−2.
Average visible transmittance (AVT) values of the layer stack glass/ITO/TiO2/active layer/MoO3.
From [18].
Performance data of semitransparent, laminated glass/ITO/TiO2/PBDTTT-C:Cy7-T:PC70BM (0.7:0.3:1.5 w/w/w)/MoO3 (X nm)/PEDOT:PSS HTL (Y nm)//PEDOT:PSS:sorbitol/Ag-mesh/PET solar cells.
| Entry | Thickness MoO3 (nm) | Thickness PEDOT:PSS HTL (nm) | Voc (V) | Jsc (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | PCE | PCE average (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | 0 | 0 | 0.58 | 6.3 | 29 | 1.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
| H | 5 | 0 | 0.62 | 8.4 | 46 | 2.6 | 2.1 ± 0.3 |
| I | 0 | 30 | 0.59 | 6.0 | 41 | 1.6 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| J | 5 | 30 | 0.59 | 8.8 | 53 | 3.0 | |
| 0.56 ± 0.03 | 8.1 ± 0.7 | 54 ± 4 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | ||||
| K | 5 | 30 | 0.59 | 6.6 | 50 | 2.1 |
The light intensity was 91 mW cm−2.
Values when omitting Cy7-T.
Detailed average values from 20 cells.
Figure 1. (a) Molecular structures of the polymer PBDTTT-C and the near-infrared absorbing cyanine dye Cy7-T with the anion ∆-TRISPHAT. (b) Schematic representation of the solar cell with an evaporated silver (Ag) top electrode (left) and a transparent laminated electrode (right). (c) Normalized absorption spectra (films on glass) of the electron donors and the acceptor material PC70BM.
Figure 2. Best JV-scans (a) and typical external quantum efficiency (EQE) versus wavelength curves (b) for opaque (i) PBDTTT-C:PC70BM and (ii) PBDTTT-C:Cy7-T:PC70BM solar cells (Table 1, entries A and E, respectively). Short-circuit currents of (i) 11.8, (ii) 10.2 and (iii) 7.8 mA cm−2 were calculated by convoluting the EQE with the AM1.5G solar spectrum. (c) Transmittance spectra (i) and (ii) of the layer stacks glass/ITO/TiO2/active layer (~90 nm)/MoO3 with indicated weight fractions. In all parts (iii) indicates the optimized laminated cell (Table 2, entry J).
Figure 3. AFM topography of ternary PBDTTT-C:Cy7-T:PC70BM films with proportions (a) 1:0:1.5, (b) 0.7:0.3:1.5, (c) 0.5:0.5:1.5 and (d) 0.3:0.7:1.5. The scale bar is 1 μm.
Figure 4. (a) Optical microscopy image of the commercial substrate that consists of a random mesh-like silver network on PET. Optical confocal microscopy images of the laminate electrode when coating with a ~450 nm thick (b) and ~1.3 μm thick (c) PEDOT:PSS:sorbitol film. For small film thicknesses (b), the metal network is not fully covered. (d) Photograph of the semitransparent, laminated cell.