| Literature DB >> 28179898 |
Talia N M Jewell1, Ulas Karaoz1, Markus Bill1, Romy Chakraborty1, Eoin L Brodie1, Kenneth H Williams1, Harry R Beller1.
Abstract
Organic matter deposits in alluvial aquiEntities:
Keywords: Bathyarchaeota; Hydrogenophaga; aquifer; biogeochemistry; metagenome; naturally reduced zone (NRZ); strain-resolved metatranscriptome
Year: 2017 PMID: 28179898 PMCID: PMC5264521 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Geochemical measurements taken during the 20-day microcosm study. (A) CO2, acetate, DOC, and methane. CO2 measurements are presented as live minus killed microcosm values to account for abiotic losses of CO2 (separate live and killed CO2 values are shown in Supplementary Figure 1). (B) Linear regression fit of CO2 produced vs. DOC consumed. Note that the acetate data on day 20 represents the average of 3 out of 4 replicates—details are given in Table 1.
Geochemical data for microcosms over the 20-day study.
| pH | 7.9 | 0.0 | 8.1 | 0.2 | 8.1 | 0.2 | 8.1 | 0.4 | NA | NA | 7.9 | 0.0 | NA | |
| Fe(II) (mM) | 8.0 | 2.4 | 9.0 | 0.03 | 9.8 | 0.03 | 9.1 | 0.01 | 15.0 | 2.2 | 4.5 | 0.4 | NA | |
| Ammonium (μM) | 178 | 1.6 | 153 | 12 | 143 | 23 | 154 | 17 | 137 | 3.3 | 202 | 6.1 | 212 | 18 |
| Chloride (mM) | 3.34 | 0.13 | 3.27 | 0.09 | 3.29 | 0.12 | 3.50 | 0.21 | 3.29 | 0.23 | 3.36 | 0.12 | 3.38 | 0.23 |
| Acetate (μM) | 60 | 4.3 | 44 | 13 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 42 | 22 | 620 | 35 | 120 | 26 | 110 | 35 |
| Propionate (μM) | <DL | < DL | <DL | < DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | |||||||
| Sulfate (mM) | 8.67 | 0.11 | 8.36 | 0.46 | 8.26 | 0.59 | 8.66 | 0.90 | 8.10 | 0.86 | 9.00 | 0.31 | 8.75 | 0.39 |
| Nitrate (μM) | 114 | 5.6 | 118 | 12 | 111 | 14 | 98 | 41 | 120 | 25 | 115 | 2.5 | 109 | 17 |
| Nitrite (μM) | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | |||||||
| DOC (μmol) | 17.7 | 14.4 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 5.9 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 69.3 | 10.5 | 57.5 | 7.9 |
| DOC δ13C (%0) | −28.54 | < DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | −23.82 | 0.44 | −23.56 | 0.19 | |||||
| Nitrous oxide (ppm) | < DL | < DL | < DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | |||||||
| Methane (ppm) | 1.3 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 0.29 | 6.4 | 0.19 | 7.7 | 0.76 | 15.4 | 0.56 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 |
| Hydrogen (ppm) | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | <DL | |||||||
Standard deviation.
Not analyzed.
Note that the acetate data on day 20 (live) represents the average of 3 replicates that were attached to the respirometer; a fourth sample, not attached to the respirometer, did not show an increase in acetate. If all replicates were included, acetate would be 470 ± 310 μM.
Below detection limit: propionate, 10 μM; nitrite, 10 μM; DOC δ.
Figure 2Primary taxa composition. (A) Percent of total community mapped DNA (as depth of coverage) and (B) percent of total community mapped mRNA (as RPKM). Hydrogenophaga b174, belonging to the Comamonadaceae family, is boxed in red.
Figure 3Temporal trends of Trends of DOC concentration and Hydrogenophaga b174 relative population and activity (as % of community DNA and mRNA, respectively). The DOC plot is identical to that in Figure 1. From linear regression analysis, the r2-value of DOC vs. percent DNA from days 0 to 15 is 0.98 (P < 0.05) and of DOC vs. percent mRNA is 0.90 (P > 0.05). (B) Selected Hydrogenophaga b174 ORFs involved in heterotrophic metabolism that have a strong inverse correlation with DOC concentration (r2 > 0.8 at from days 0 to 15). The ORF annotations are as follows: fatty acid beta-oxidation: enoyl-CoA hydratase (#1); amino acid degradation: putative amino acid ABC transporter permease (#2), branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter permease (#3), amino acid dehydrogenase (#4), peptidases (#5 and #6); miscellaneous hydrolases: alpha/beta hydrolase fold protein (#7), urea carboxylase (#8), allophanate hydrolases (#9 and #10), hydrolases (#11 and #12), hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase (#13), lytic transglycosylase (#14); carbohydrate catabolism: phosphofructokinase (#15), phosphoglycerate kinase (#16), mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase/mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (#17), D-hexose-6-phosphate mutarotase (#18), carbohydrate-binding protein (#19), and malate synthase G (#20). ORF identification, annotation, RPKM, and r2-values are listed in Supplementary Table 4.
Figure 4b174 cell diagram representing selected catabolic and energy conservation pathways active during the study. This reconstruction is a composite of pathways that were active at any measured point during the 20-day study. Genes that were not expressed, or for which the gene was not identified in the metagenome and therefore no expression level could be assigned, are represented in the diagram as white and black, respectively. Protein complexes (e.g., ETC and hydrogenases) are represented in the diagram with a color gradient if not all subunit genes were expressed. Denitrification: 1, nitrate/nitrite transporters (narKK); 2, nitrate reductase (narGH); 3, nitrite reductase (nirS); 4, nitric oxide reductase (norB); 5, nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ); 6, assimilatory nitrate reductase (nasAB); 7, assimilatory nitrite reductase (nirB); 8, anaerobic nitric oxide reductase flavoredoxin (norV); Amino acid degradation: 9, amino acid transporters; 10, arginine deiminase; 11, ornithine carbamoyltransferase; 12, carbamate kinase; 13, arginine decarboxylase; 14, agmatinase; 15, arginase; 16, urease (ureABC); 17, ornithine cyclodeaminase; 18, bifunctional proline dehydrogenase/L-glutamate gamma-semialdehyde dehydrogenase; 19, histidine ammonia-lyase; 20, urocanase; 21 imidazolonepropionase; 22, formimidoylglutamase; 23, glutamate dehydrogenase; 24, aspartate aminotransferase; β-oxidation: 25, Fatty acid transporters; 26, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; 27, enoyl-CoA hydratase; 28, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase; 29; acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (thiolase); Plant biomass degradation: 30, sugar transporters; 31, xylose isomerase; 32, xylulokinase; 33, tannase and feruloyl esterase; 34, feruloyl-CoA synthase; 35, vanillin synthase /trans-feruloyl-CoA hydratase; 36, vanillin dehydrogenase; 37, pyrogallol hydroxytransferase large subunit; 38, gallate dioxygenase; 39, 2-pyrone-4,6-dicarboxylate hydrolase; 40, 4-oxalomesaconate hydratase; 41, 4-carboxy-4-hydroxy-2-oxoadipate aldolase/oxaloacetate decarboxylase; Glycolysis: 42, glucokinase; 43, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase; 44, 6-phosphofructokinase; 45, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase; 46, triose-phosphate isomerase; 47, type I glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; 48, phosphoglycerate kinase; 49, phosphoglycerate mutase; 50, enolase; 51, pyruvate kinase; Entner-Doudoroff Pathway: 52, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; 53, 6-phosphogluconolactonase; 54, phosphogluconate dehydratase; 55, 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate aldolase; TCA Cycle: 56, pyruvate dehydrogenase (acetyl-transferring) (aceE); 57, citrate (Si)-synthase (gltA); 58, aconitate hydratase (acnAB); 59, isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP+) (icdA); 60, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase subunit E1 (sucA); 61, succinate-CoA ligase subunit, beta (sucCD); 62, succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit (sdhABCD); 63, fumarate hydratase (fumCA); 64, malate dehydrogenase (mdh); CBB Cycle: 65, bicarbonate transporters; 66, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) (rbcLSQO); 67, phosphoglycerate kinase; 68, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; 69, triose-phosphate isomerase; 70, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase; 71, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase class 1; 72, transketolase; 73, ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase; 74, phosphoribulokinase; 75, “aerobic” carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (coxLSM); S oxidation: 76, S-compound transporters; 77, rhodanese; 78, sulfite dehydrogenase; 79, S oxidation genes (soxCD, cytochrome c552, cytochrome c551, soxYZAXBR); H2 oxidation: 80, [NiFe] hydrogenase (hupLU) and accessory/maturation proteins; electron transport chain (ETC)/oxidative phosphorylation: 81, ETC complex I—NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (nuoABCDEFGHIJKLMN); 82, ETC complex II—succinate dehydrogenase (sdhCD, sdhAB); 83, ETC complex III—cytochrome bc1-type ubiquinol oxidoreductase (petAB); 84, ETC complex IV—cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase (ccoPQON); 85, ETC complex V—ATP synthase (atpCDIBEFHAG).
Figure 5Temporal expression of selected genes for (A) denitrification in Hydrogenophaga b174 and (B) denitrification and acetone carboxylase in Dechloromonas b45. The expression (RPKM) has been normalized to the maximum for each gene.
Figure 6Temporal expression profiles for transcripts potentially contributing to a pulse of acetogenesis after day 15: (A) acetate-related gene expression and acetate concentration (red line), (B) heat map of the summed RPKM values from all contributing acetate-related transcripts, (C) PFOR RPKM values per bin, with more prominent bins highlighted in the key. Gene abbreviations: carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase (CODH/ACS), acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase (ACD/ACSS), pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR), pyruvate formate-lyase (PFL), pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), NADP+-dependent pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH/NADP+), acetate kinase (AckA), phosphate acetyltransferase (phosphotransacetylase, PTA), acetyl-CoA hydrolase (ACH), and acetate:succinate CoA-transferase (SCT).
Figure 7The number of ORFs from contributing bins represented in the top 100 transcripts at each time point. Bin 89 represents Ca. Bathyarchaeota.
Figure 8Phylogenetic tree of expressed hydrolases. Red lines represent ORFs from the top 100 transcripts annotated as cell wall-associated hydrolases. Blue lines represent cell wall-associated hydrolases with a peptidoglycan-targeting catalytic domain. ORFs from Ca. Bathyarchaeota b89 are shown in boldface. Local support values (50–100%) for nodes are represented as circles scaled from small to large. The expression (RPKM) for each ORF at each time point is represented by stacked histograms encircling the tree. The RPKM values, annotations, and sequence identities for each ORF in this tree can be found in Supplementary Table 9. The hydrolase sequences were aligned with Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., 2011) and trimmed and visualized with Jalview (Waterhouse et al., 2009).