| Literature DB >> 28179488 |
Rahul Rawat1, Phuong Hong Nguyen2, Lan Mai Tran3, Nemat Hajeebhoy3, Huan Van Nguyen4, Jean Baker3, Edward A Frongillo5, Marie T Ruel1, Purnima Menon1.
Abstract
Background: Rigorous evaluations of health system-based interventions in large-scale programs to improve complementary feeding (CF) practices are limited. Alive & Thrive applied principles of social franchising within the government health system in Vietnam to improve the quality of interpersonal counseling (IPC) for infant and young child feeding combined with a national mass media (MM) campaign and community mobilization (CM).Objective: We evaluated the impact of enhanced IPC + MM + CM (intensive) compared with standard IPC + less-intensive MM and CM (nonintensive) on CF practices and anthropometric indicators.Entities:
Keywords: Vietnam; child undernutrition; cluster-randomized trial; complementary feeding; effectiveness evaluation; interpersonal counseling; mass media
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28179488 PMCID: PMC5368587 DOI: 10.3945/jn.116.243907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr ISSN: 0022-3166 Impact factor: 4.798
Interpersonal counseling package
| EBF promotion | EBF support | EBF management | CF education | CF management | |
| Timing of contacts | Third trimester of pregnancy; 3 contacts: seventh month of pregnancy, eighth month of pregnancy, ninth month of pregnancy | Delivery; 1 contact | Child aged 0–6 mo; 4 contacts: at ages 2–4 wk, 1–2 mo, 2–3 mo, 4–5 mo | Child aged 5–6 mo; 1 contact | Child aged 6–24 mo; 6 contacts: at ages 6–7 mo, 8–9 mo, 10–11 mo, 12–14 mo, 15–18 mo, 18–24 mo |
| Types of counseling | 2 individuals, 1 group | Individual | 2 individuals, 2 groups | Individual | Combination of individual and group |
| Contents | Provides timely and appropriate information on EBF for mothers before delivery and in the third trimester of pregnancy | Supports mothers to initiate BF after delivery at health facilities | Follows up and supports mothers to maintain EBF in the 1–2 wk postpartum to 3–6 mo | Provides basic information needed for mothers to give appropriate complementary foods at 6 mo of age—not earlier or later | Provides information for mothers about CF, so mothers will: know age-appropriate CF practices, have the skills to practice age-appropriate CF, be able to prepare age-appropriate complementary foods, know appropriate foods to feed their infants by age, receive individual counselling that offers follow-up and support in CF |
| Principles of optimal CF | — | — | — | Start giving complementary foods at 6 mo of age, not too early or too late. Make foods tender for easy chewing and swallowing. Continue BF for as long as possible. | |
| Start with liquids, then go to solid foods, from little to big amounts, to help the infant get acquainted with new food (not providing diluted food for >2 wk). | |||||
| Increase the number of meals according to the child’s age; ensure that the food suits the infant’s appetite. | |||||
| Prepare mixed foods rich in nutrients by using locally available foods. | |||||
| Thicken the complementary food. Add oil, fat, sesame, or peanut in the complementary food to provide flavor and more energy and to help the infant grow fast. | |||||
| Preparation and cooking tools must be clean; wash your hands before preparing meals and feeding the child. | |||||
| Give the child more complementary food during and after the child’s illness and give the child more liquid food and drink, especially if the child has diarrhea or a high temperature. | |||||
| Do not give the child MSG because it is not nutritious. Do not give the child confectionery or soft drinks before meals because the sweets increase blood sugar, inhibiting an extracting enzyme so that the child loses his or her appetite, skips the meal, or takes less food. | |||||
BF, breastfeeding; CF, complementary feeding; EBF, exclusive breastfeeding; MSG, monosodium glutamate.
FIGURE 1Trial profile.
Selected characteristics of the study sample at baseline
| Age 6–23.9 mo | Age 24–59.9 mo | |||||
| Characteristics | Intensive ( | Nonintensive ( | Intensive ( | Nonintensive ( | ||
| Household | ||||||
| Children aged <5 y, | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.22 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.28 |
| Ownership of house, % | 47.4 | 53.1 | 0.06 | 63.0 | 63.1 | 0.96 |
| Ownership of garden, % | 63.5 | 57.6 | 0.046 | 59.6 | 60.0 | 0.85 |
| Ownership of agricultural land, % | 71.1 | 73.5 | 0.38 | 72.2 | 76.4 | 0.03 |
| SES | −0.2 ± 1.0 | −0.2 ± 0.9 | 0.95 | −0.4 ± 0.9 | −0.3 ± 0.9 | 0.06 |
| Food security score | 2.2 ± 4.0 | 2.3 ± 4.0 | 0.70 | 2.7 ± 4.2 | 2.5 ± 4.2 | 0.55 |
| Food insecurity, | 36.4 | 39.1 | 0.36 | 43.0 | 40.5 | 0.25 |
| Household food dietary diversity, | 9.9 ± 2.3 | 9.9 ± 2.2 | 0.59 | 9.6 ± 2.5 | 9.9 ± 2.4 | 0.04 |
| Household hygiene score (range: 0–10), | 7.2 ± 2.3 | 7.3 ± 2.2 | 0.52 | 6.6 ± 2.5 | 6.7 ± 2.4 | 0.39 |
| Maternal factors | ||||||
| Maternal stress, | 29.8 | 32.0 | 0.43 | 34.9 | 34.2 | 0.74 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 19.9 ± 2.5 | 19.9 ± 2.4 | 0.91 | 20.1 ± 2.5 | 20.1 ± 2.7 | 0.82 |
| Education (range: 1–16 y), y | 9.3 ± 3.4 | 9.4 ± 3.6 | 0.58 | 8.5 ± 3.4 | 8.8 ± 3.4 | 0.07 |
| Occupation as farmer, % | 53.9 | 52.4 | 0.62 | 61.2 | 56.7 | 0.04 |
| Maternal dietary diversity, | 8.9 ± 2.3 | 9.0 ± 2.3 | 0.35 | 8.7 ± 2.5 | 8.8 ± 2.4 | 0.16 |
| Health services access | ||||||
| Prenatal visits, | 2.7 ± 2.7 | 2.4 ± 2.5 | 0.07 | 2.4 ± 2.6 | 2.0 ± 2.4 | 0.005 |
| Mothers used any iron supplement during pregnancy, % | 93.6 | 92.6 | 0.53 | 88.6 | 88.0 | 0.71 |
| Child factors | ||||||
| Female, % | 46.9 | 46.7 | 0.96 | 49.3 | 46.3 | 0.18 |
| Birth weight, kg | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 0.37 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 0.72 |
| Age, mo | 13.9 ± 5.3 | 14.4 ± 5.4 | 0.11 | 40.8 ± 9.7 | 40.7 ± 9.7 | 0.81 |
| Acute respiratory infection, | 50.0 | 46.4 | 0.23 | 40.6 | 41.3 | 0.75 |
| Diarrhea, | 13.3 | 13.7 | 0.85 | 6.0 | 7.1 | 0.33 |
| Child anthropometric indicators | ||||||
| HAZ | −0.8 ± 1.3 | −0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.66 | −1.4 ± 1.0 | −1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.09 |
| Stunting | 15.3 | 14.3 | 0.62 | 25.4 | 22.5 | 0.14 |
| WAZ | −0.8 ± 1.2 | −0.7 ± 1.1 | 0.77 | −1.2 ± 1.0 | −1.1 ± 1.0 | 0.01 |
| Underweight | 12.2 | 9.9 | 0.22 | 20.5 | 16.2 | 0.01 |
| WHZ | −0.5 ± 1.1 | −0.5 ± 1.1 | 0.88 | −0.6 ± 0.9 | −0.6 ± 1.0 | 0.04 |
| Wasting | 5.4 | 5.9 | 0.72 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 0.20 |
Values are means ± SDs unless otherwise indicated. HAZ, height-for-age z score; SES, socioeconomic status; WAZ, weight-for-age z score; WHZ, weight-for-height z score.
P values for the difference between intensive and nonintensive at 6–23.9 mo.
P values for the difference between intensive and nonintensive at 24–59.9 mo.
An SES index was constructed by using principal components analysis with variables on ownership and assets. It is a standardized score with mean = 0 and SD = 1.
Household food security was measured by using the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III/US Agency for International Development’s Household Food Insecurity Access Scale.
Maternal stress was measured by using the WHO’s Self-Reporting Questionnaire–20 (31). We used a cutoff of 7 to classify women with high-level stress.
Acute respiratory infection and diarrhea were measured through maternal recall of symptoms in the 2 wk before the survey.
Exposure to IPC and mass media among sample of mothers with children aged 6–23 mo at endline
| Indicator | Intensive ( | Nonintensive ( | Subset of intensive sample with any exposure to IPC ( |
| Ever exposed to IPC, % | 41.9 | — | — |
| Number of exposures to IPC, % | |||
| 0 visits | 58.1 | — | — |
| 1 visits | 17.6 | — | 42.0 |
| 2 visits | 10.1 | — | 24.1 |
| 3 visits | 5.9 | — | 14.2 |
| ≥4 visits | 8.3 | — | 19.8 |
| Average number of visits among those who were exposed to IPC | 1.1 ± 1.8 | — | 2.5 ± 2.0 |
| Exposure to IPC during the past 6 mo, % | 39.3 | — | 73.1 |
| 0 visits | 60.7 | — | 26.9 |
| 1 visits | 18.6 | — | 34.0 |
| 2 visits | 11.1 | — | 21.2 |
| ≥3 visits | 9.7 | — | 17.9 |
| Average number of visits during the past 6 mo | 0.7 ± 1.0 | — | 1.3 ± 1.1 |
| Exposure to CF TVC, % | 36.4 | 30.6 | 44.8 |
| Received invitation card (6–23.9 mo old), % | 50.6 | — | 76.4 |
| Exposure to IPC and mass media, % | |||
| No exposure to either | 40.5 | 69.4 | — |
| Ever seen CF TVCs (only) | 17.6 | 30.6 | — |
| Ever exposed to IPC (only) | 23.1 | — | 55.2 |
| Exposed to both | 18.8 | — | 44.8 |
Values are means ± SDs unless otherwise indicated. Only include exposures after 6 mo of age. CF, complementary feeding; IPC, interpersonal counseling; TVC, television commercial; —, data not available.
CF practices in the previous day among children aged 6–23.9 mo, by program and survey round in Vietnam
| Baseline 2010 (T1) | Endline 2014 (T2) | ||||||
| Impact indicators | Intensive | Nonintensive | Intensive | Nonintensive | DDEs | Adjusted DDEs | Fully adjusted DDEs |
| ITT analysis | |||||||
| Introduction of solid and semisolid foods | 92.6 | 90.4 | 95.6 | 97.8 | −4.4 | −5.1 | −4.9 |
| Minimum diet diversity | 73.7 | 75.8 | 90.9 | 87.9 | 5.1 | 4.61 | 4.0 |
| Minimum meal frequency | 79.8 | 82.0 | 95.5 | 93.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Minimum acceptable diet | 56.4 | 57.5 | 81.6 | 76.6 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 5.7 |
| Consumption of iron-rich foods | 85.8 | 85.3 | 97.2 | 95.6 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Number of food groups (range: 0–7) | 4.4 ± 1.6 | 4.4 ± 1.6 | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 5.0 ± 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Number of meals (range: 0–13) | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Modified per-protocol analysis | |||||||
| Introduction of solid and semisolid foods | 92.6 | 90.4 | 92.7 | 97.8 | −7.0 | −8.0 | −8.2 |
| Minimum diet diversity | 73.7 | 75.8 | 93.6## | 87.9 | 8.0+ | 7.4* | 6.4* |
| Minimum meal frequency | 79.8 | 82.0 | 95.2 | 93.3 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Minimum acceptable diet | 56.4 | 57.5 | 86.9### | 76.6 | 11.7* | 11.5* | 8.0* |
| Consumption of iron-rich foods | 85.8 | 85.3 | 97.5 | 95.6 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| Number of food groups (range: 0–7) | 4.4 ± 1.6 | 4.4 ± 1.6 | 5.3 ± 1.1### | 5.0 ± 1.3 | 0.3+ | 0.3* | 0.1 |
| Number of meals (range: 0–13) | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.07 |
Values are means ± SDs or percentages unless otherwise indicated. +,*Significant change from baseline to endline: +P < 0.10, *P < 0.05. ##,###Different from nonintensive at that time: ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001. CF, complementary feeding; DDE, difference-in-difference estimate; ITT, intent-to-treat; MTBT, Mặt Tri Bé Th (The Little Sun); T, time.
DDEs with clustered SEs comparing intensive and nonintensive areas in 2010 and 2014, accounting for geographic clustering only. P values were obtained from regression models. DDEs for ITT analyses were for pure ITT analyses.
DDEs with clustered SEs comparing intensive and nonintensive areas in 2010 and 2014, accounting for geographic clustering, child sex, and child age. P values were obtained from regression models.
DDEs with clustered SEs comparing intensive and nonintensive areas in 2010 and 2014, accounting for geographic clustering, child sex, child age, and variables that were different at baseline (ownership of garden). Per-protocol analysis adjusted for ownership of garden, maternal education, and household food diversity. P values were obtained from regression models.
Modified per-protocol analysis included only women who had attended the MTBT at least once in the intensive group.
FIGURE 2Timely food introduction, by program and survey round in Vietnam, for water (A), rice (B), vegetables (C), and cow milk and formula (D). The timely introduction of foods was defined as food introduced at 6–8.9 mo of age. Difference-in-difference estimates were 20.6, 20.2, 13.1, and 11.6 percentage points for water, rice, vegetables, and cow milk and formula, respectively.
Anthropometric indicators for children aged 24–59.9 mo, by program and survey round in Vietnam
| Baseline 2010 (T1) | Endline 2014 (T2) | ||||||
| Impact indicators | Intensive | Nonintensive | Intensive | Nonintensive | DDEs | Adjusted DDEs | Fully adjusted DDEs |
| ITT analysis | |||||||
| HAZ | −1.4 ± 1.0 | −1.3 ± 1.0 | −1.1 ± 1.0 | −1.1 ± 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Stunting | 25.4 | 22.5 | 18.2 | 17.1 | −1.7 | −1.8 | −1.1 |
| WAZ | −1.2 ± 1.0 | −1.1 ± 1.0 | −0.8 ± 1.1 | −0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Underweight | 20.5 | 16.2 | 12.4 | 11.4 | −3.2 | −3.2 | −2.6 |
| WHZ | −0.6 ± 0.9 | −0.6 ± 1.0 | −0.3 ± 1.1 | −0.2 ± 1.2 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Wasting | 5.3 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 4.2 | −2.7* | −2.7* | −2.5 |
| Modified per-protocol analysis | |||||||
| HAZ | −1.4 ± 1.0 | −1.3 ± 1.0 | −1.1 ± 0.9 | −1.1 ± 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.02 |
| Stunting | 25.4 | 22.5 | 19.4 | 17.1 | −1.0 | −1.3 | 0.01 |
| WAZ | −1.2 ± 1.0 | −1.1 ± 1.0 | −0.9 ± 1.0 | −0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.04 | −0.02 |
| Underweight | 20.5 | 16.2 | 13.9 | 11.4 | −1.9 | −1.5 | −0.8 |
| WHZ | −0.6 ± 0.9 | −0.6 ± 1.0 | −0.3 ± 1.2 | −0.2 ± 1.2 | 0.0 | −0.02 | −0.1 |
| Wasting | 5.3 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 4.2 | −2.9+ | −2.7+ | −2.6 |
Values are means ± SDs or percentages unless otherwise indicated. +,*Significant change from baseline to endline: +P < 0.10, *P < 0.05. DDE, difference-in-difference estimate; HAZ, height-for-age z score; ITT, intent-to-treat; MTBT, Mặt Tri Bé Th (The Little Sun); T, time; WAZ, weight-for-age z score; WHZ, height-for-age z score.
DDEs with clustered SEs comparing intensive and nonintensive areas in 2010 and 2014, accounting for geographic clustering only. P values were obtained from regression models. DDEs for ITT analyses were for pure ITT analyses.
DDEs with clustered SEs comparing intensive and nonintensive areas in 2010 and 2014, accounting for geographic clustering, child sex, and child age. P values were obtained from regression models.
DDEs with clustered SEs comparing intensive and nonintensive areas in 2010 and 2014, accounting for geographic clustering, child sex, child age, and variables that were different in improvement at baseline and endline (maternal stress and household food dietary diversity for households with children aged 24–59.9 mo). Per-protocol analysis also adjusted for ownership of gardens, maternal education, BMI, socioeconomic status, and food security. P values were obtained from regression models.
Modified per-protocol analysis included only women who had attended the MTBT at least once in the intensive group.