| Literature DB >> 28179405 |
Wen Li1, Xiaolong Sun1, Fang Yuan1, Qiong Gao1, Yue Ma1, Yongli Jiang1, Xiai Yang1, Fang Yang1, Lei Ma1, Wen Jiang2.
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of bacterial meningitis (BM) relies on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Gram staining and bacterial culture, which often present high false-negative rates because of antibiotic abuse. Thus, a novel and reliable diagnostic biomarker is required. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been well demonstrated to be specifically produced from peripheral tissues by bacterial infection, which makes it a potential diagnostic biomarker candidate. Here, we performed a prospective clinical study comprising a total of 143 patients to investigate the diagnostic value of CSF PCT, serum PCT, and other conventional biomarkers for BM. Patients were assigned to the BM (n = 49), tuberculous meningitis (TBM) (n = 25), viral meningitis/encephalitis (VM/E) (n = 34), autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) (n = 15), or noninflammatory nervous system diseases (NINSD) group (n = 20). Empirical antibiotic pretreatment was not an exclusion criterion. Our results show that the CSF PCT level was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in patients with BM (median, 0.22 ng/ml; range, 0.13 to 0.54 ng/ml) than in those with TBM (median, 0.12 ng/ml; range, 0.07 to 0.16 ng/ml), VM/E (median, 0.09 ng/ml; range, 0.07 to 0.11 ng/ml), AIE (median, 0.06 ng/ml; range, 0.05 to 0.10 ng/ml), or NINSD (median, 0.07 ng/ml; range, 0.06 to 0.08 ng/ml). Among the assessed biomarkers, CSF PCT exhibited the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.881; 95% confidence interval, 0.810 to 0.932; cutoff value, 0.15 ng/ml; sensitivity, 69.39%; specificity, 91.49%). Our study sheds light upon the diagnostic dilemma of BM due to antibiotic abuse. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02278016.).Entities:
Keywords: bacterial meningitis; cerebrospinal fluid; diagnostic biomarker; procalcitonin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28179405 PMCID: PMC5377847 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02018-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948