| Literature DB >> 28178964 |
Haebeom Lee1, Hyunho Kim2, Jungkuk Kim3, Hwan-Sup Oh1,4, Young-Jae Park1,2, Young-Bae Park5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture treatments that regulate the heart are used to treat various clinical disorders and conditions. Although many studies have been conducted to measure quantitatively the effects of acupuncture, thus far, models that describe these effects have not been established. The purpose of this study was to derive a transfer function model of acupuncture stimulation within the electrocardiograms based on the periods before, during, and after acupuncture.Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture; ECG; Korean medicine; TCM; Transfer function
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28178964 PMCID: PMC5299648 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1615-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1CONSORT flowchart of the clinical trial
Fig. 2Procedure of the clinical trial
Averaged goodness of fit for each transfer function for each subject
| ON/OD | GF of BDA | GF of DAA | GF of BAA | Mean GF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/1 | 92.48 | 94.07 | 90.64 | 92.40 |
| 0/2 | 87.72 | 95.77 | 91.46 | 91.65 |
| 1/2 | 93.56 | 95.83 | 92.05 | 93.81 |
| 0/3 | 87.84 | 89.12 | 82.69 | 86.55 |
| 1/3 | 94.21 | 96.25 | 92.35 | 94.27 |
| 2/3 | 93.43 | 96.38 | 92.78 | 94.20 |
| 0/4 | 42.37 | 53.79 | 45.00 | 47.05 |
| 1/4 | 84.56 | 86.03 | 77.63 | 82.74 |
| 2/4 | 87.84 | 95.35 | 92.87 | 92.02 |
| 3/4 | 93.85 | 96.21 | 93.05 | 94.37 |
| 0/5 | 16.59 | 30.57 | 16.97 | 21.38 |
| 1/5 | 76.49 | 80.97 | 48.41 | 68.62 |
| 2/5 | 83.13 | 96.41 | 87.08 | 88.87 |
| 3/5 | 92.01 | 96.26 | 88.18 | 92.15 |
| 4/5 | 94.91 | 95.73 | 92.81 | 94.48 |
ON order of numerator, OD order of denominator, GF goodness of fit, BDA periods before and during acupuncture, DAA periods during and after acupuncture, BAA periods before and after acupuncture
Fig. 3Coefficients of numerator and denominator of generalized transfer function
Fig. 4Three SAECGs and simulated results. a Three SAECGs; measured SAECG, simulated SAECG by individual, and generalized transfer function. b Example of 3 acupuncture SAECGs: a measured SAECG, a simulated SAECG by individual transfer function, and a simulated SAECG by generalized transfer function. ITF, individual transfer function; GTF, generalized transfer function; SAECG, signal-averaged electrocardiogram; BDA, before and during acupuncture
Goodness of fit of individual and generalized transfer function model
| Before and during acupuncture | During and after acupuncture | Before and after acupuncture | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | GF of ITFM | GF of GTFM | GF of ITFM | GF of GTFM | GF of ITFM | GF of GTFM |
| 1 | 94.03 | 94.35 | 97.95 | 95.34 | 95.62 | 94.47 |
| 2 | 97.53 | 95.90 | 94.71 | 92.98 | 90.41 | 90.27 |
| 3 | 98.01 | 97.23 | 94.19 | 93.59 | 93.78 | 92.49 |
| 4 | 98.44 | 98.03 | 97.96 | 97.33 | 98.15 | 97.85 |
| 5 | 96.16 | 94.30 | 97.68 | 96.44 | 94.75 | 91.71 |
| 6 | 96.06 | 95.71 | 98.31 | 97.79 | 96.03 | 95.62 |
| 7 | 90.90 | 88.93 | 90.89 | 88.10 | 82.35 | 76.95 |
| 8 | 92.65 | 92.94 | 97.16 | 96.57 | 95.66 | 93.88 |
| 9 | 93.02 | 91.76 | 96.68 | 96.02 | 91.02 | 88.24 |
| 10 | 83.03 | 96.42 | 98.48 | 97.72 | 94.01 | 94.43 |
| 11 | 92.95 | 87.80 | 97.65 | 96.82 | 91.32 | 84.31 |
| 12 | 92.42 | 90.16 | 96.93 | 96.60 | 94.03 | 93.50 |
| 13 | 94.47 | 93.76 | 97.51 | 97.44 | 92.98 | 92.02 |
| 14 | 94.03 | 93.19 | 98.91 | 98.60 | 89.08 | 92.88 |
| Avg | 93.84 | 93.61 | 96.79 | 95.81 | 92.80 | 91.33 |
| SD | 3.857 | 3.074 | 2.157 | 2.712 | 3.894 | 5.282 |
ID subject identification number, GF goodness of fit, ITFM individual transfer function model, GTFM generalized transfer function model, Avg average, SD standard deviation