Literature DB >> 28178420

Can Switching from Coal to Shale Gas Bring Net Carbon Reductions to China?

Yue Qin1, Ryan Edwards2, Fan Tong3, Denise L Mauzerall1,2.   

Abstract

To increase energy security and reduce emissions of air pollutants and CO2 from coal use, China is attempting to duplicate the rapid development of shale gas that has taken place in the United States. This work builds a framework to estimate the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from China's shale gas system and compares them with GHG emissions from coal used in the power, residential, and industrial sectors. We find the mean lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas is about 30-50% lower than that of coal in all sectors under both 20 year and 100 year global warming potentials (GWP20 and GWP100). However, primarily due to large uncertainties in methane leakage, the upper bound estimate of the lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas in China could be approximately 15-60% higher than that of coal across sectors under GWP20. To ensure net GHG emission reductions when switching from coal to shale gas, we estimate the breakeven methane leakage rates to be approximately 6.0%, 7.7%, and 4.2% in the power, residential, and industrial sectors, respectively, under GWP20. We find shale gas in China has a good chance of delivering air quality and climate cobenefits, particularly when used in the residential sector, with proper methane leakage control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28178420     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Air quality, health, and climate implications of China's synthetic natural gas development.

Authors:  Yue Qin; Fabian Wagner; Noah Scovronick; Wei Peng; Junnan Yang; Tong Zhu; Kirk R Smith; Denise L Mauzerall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The intensification of the water footprint of hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Andrew J Kondash; Nancy E Lauer; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Sustainable development index of shale gas exploitation in China, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  Liang Li; Fan Wu; Yuanyu Cao; Fei Cheng; Dali Wang; Huizhen Li; Zhiqiang Yu; Jing You
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2022-07-31

4.  On the climate benefit of a coal-to-gas shift in Germany's electric power sector.

Authors:  Stefan Ladage; Martin Blumenberg; Dieter Franke; Andreas Bahr; Rüdiger Lutz; Sandro Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.