| Literature DB >> 28178348 |
Jaime Aguayo1, Diane Mostert2, Céline Fourrier-Jeandel1, Isabelle Cerf-Wendling1, Bruno Hostachy3, Altus Viljoen2, Renaud Ioos1.
Abstract
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) is one of the most important threats to global banana production. Strategies to control the pathogen are lacking, with plant resistance offering the only long-term solution, if sources of resistance are available. Prevention of introduction of Foc into disease-free areas thus remains a key strategy to continue sustainable banana production. In recent years, strains of Foc affecting Cavendish bananas have destroyed plantations in a number of countries in Asia and in the Middle East, and one African country. One vegetative compatibility group (VCG), 01213/16, is considered the major threat to bananas in tropical and subtropical climatic conditions. However, other genetically related VCGs, such as 0121, may potentially jeopardize banana cultures if they were introduced into disease-free areas. To prevent the introduction of these VCGs into disease-free Cavendish banana-growing countries, a real-time PCR test was developed to accurately detect both VCGs. A previously described putative virulence gene was used to develop a specific combination of hydrolysis probe/primers for the detection of tropical Foc race 4 strains. The real-time PCR parameters were optimized by following a statistical approach relying on orthogonal arrays and the Taguchi method in an attempt to enhance sensitivity and ensure high specificity of the assay. This study also assessed critical performance criteria, such as repeatability, reproducibility, robustness, and specificity, with a large including set of 136 F. oxysporum isolates, including 73 Foc pathogenic strains representing 24 VCGs. The validation data demonstrated that the new assay could be used for regulatory testing applications on banana plant material and can contribute to preventing the introduction and spread of Foc strains affecting Cavendish bananas in the tropics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28178348 PMCID: PMC5298334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of primers (F/R) and probes (P) used in this study.
| Target species | Foc race | VCG | Primer or probe | Sequence (5'- 3') | Target gene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tropical | 01213/16, | FWB-TR4 F | Gene coding for a hypothetical protein | ||
| f. sp | race 4 | 0121 | FWB-TR4 R | ||
| FWB-TR4 P | |||||
| Tropical | 01213/16, | 0422 F2 | SCAR | ||
| f. sp | race 4 | 0121 | 0422 R2 | ||
| 0422 P2 | |||||
| Tropical | 01213/16 | W2987 F | Gene coding for a hypothetical protein | ||
| f. sp | race 4 | W2987 R | |||
| Tropical | 01213/16 | Foc TR4 F | IGS | ||
| f. sp | race 4 | Foc TR4 R | |||
| Tropical | 01213/16 | VCG01213/16 F1 | IGS | ||
| f. sp | race 4 | VCG01213/16 R2 | |||
| Race 4 | 01213/16, 0121, 0120, 0122, | Foc-1 | RAPD | ||
| f. sp | 0123, 0126, 0129, 01210, | Foc-2 | |||
| 01211, 01215, 01219 | |||||
| Fusarium strains containing the putative pathogenicity gene | - | - | 356 F | Gene coding for a hypothetical protein | |
| 357 R | |||||
| Plant or fungus | - | - | 18S uni F | ITS | |
| universal primer | 18S uni R | ||||
| 18S uni P | |||||
| Fungus universal | - | - | ITS1 | ITS | |
| primer | ITS4 |
References
a This study
b[29]
c [8]
d [10]
e [13]
f [26]
g [47]
h[46].
Response of Fusarium strains to some existing Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense detection tools.
| Isolate | Species | Forma speciale | VCG | Foc1-Foc2 | W2987F/R | FocTR4F/R | 01213/16F1/R2 | Foc4-0422F2/R2/P2 | FWB-TR4 F/R/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAV180 | 0121 | + | - | - | - | + | + | ||
| CAV195 | 01219 | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| CAV1100 | 0129 | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| CAV189 | 01214 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| CAV293 | 0120 | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| CAV312 | 01213/16 | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| CAV613 | 0126 | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| CAV786 | 0124 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| CAV810 | 01213 | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| CAV929 | 0123 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| CAV604 | 01216 | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| LSVM 1074 | ---- | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| LSVM 1075 | ---- | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| NRRL 36118 | 01221 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| NRRL 36112 | 01215 | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| NRRL 36113 | 01214 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| NRRL 36115 | 01224 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| NRRL 36116 | 01223 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| NRRL 36117 | 01222 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| NRRL 26029 | 01210 | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| LSVM 419 | ---- | + | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| LSVM 1024 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1025 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1026 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1027 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1028 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1029 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1030 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1031 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1032 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSV M 942 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSV M 1079 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSV M 1082 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| NRRL13566 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 895 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM287 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| NRRL 22402 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 878 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM286 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LSVM 1018 | ---- | ---- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
References
a [26]
b [8]
c [10]
d [13]
e [29]
f This study
Orthogonal arrays of the six variables and three levels used to optimize PCR conditions for the real-time detection of tropical strains of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4.
D/P stands for denaturation/polymerization pattern.
| Runnumber | MgCl(mM) | Primer F(μM) | Primer R(μM) | Probe(μM) | AnnealingTemp (°C) | D/Ppattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 64 | 10/45 | |
| 6 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 60 | 15/45 | |
| 5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 60 | 10/45 | |
| 6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 60 | 10/45 | |
| 4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 60 | 15/45 | |
| 4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 60 | 15/30 | |
| 6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 62 | 15/45 | |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 60 | 15/30 | |
| 5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 64 | 15/45 | |
| 4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 62 | 10/45 | |
| 6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 64 | 15/30 | |
| 4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 64 | 15/45 | |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 62 | 15/45 | |
| 5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 62 | 10/45 | |
| 6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 62 | 15/30 | |
| 4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 62 | 15/30 | |
| 5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 64 | 15/30 | |
| 6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 64 | 10/45 |
Fig 1FWB-TR4 qPCR standard curve built with a 10-fold serial dilution of plasmid DNA positive control diluted in water (grey line) or in a background of banana DNA (black line).
Sensitivity comparison between five detection tools used for F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense.
Tests were performed on three replicates. A positive amplification is represented by +, while a negative result is represented by–for each replicate. Parentheses show a weak positive amplification in conventional PCR.
| Genomic Foc TR4 target DNA (ng/μL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | 1 | 1x10-1 | 1x10-2 | 1x10-3 |
| FWB-TR4-F/R/P | ||||
| Foc4 0422F2/R2/P2 | ||||
| W2987 F/R | ||||
| VCG01213/16 F1/R2 | ||||
| Foc TR4 F/R | ||||
References
a This study
b [29]
c [8]
d [13]
e [10].
ANOVA table on the effects of dilution (10 times or 100 times), sample type (dry or frozen), and their interaction.
| Source of Variation | Df | Sum of squares | Mean square | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dilution (1/10th; 1/100th) | 1 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.16 | 0.69 |
| Sample type (dry; frozen) | 1 | 443.67 | 443.67 | 56.61 | <0.001 |
| Dilution * Sample type | 1 | 77.59 | 77.59 | 9.90 | 0.002 |
| Residuals | 106 | 830.78 | 7.84 |
Fig 2Parametrical comparison between samples pre-treatments before PCR.
Comparisons were performed testing the type of sample (dry or frozen banana tissue) and the dilution of the DNA after extraction (raw DNA diluted 10 times or raw DNA diluted 100 times).
Post-hoc Tukey Kramer pairwise comparison test between groups of treatments.
Samples were either dry or frozen and either diluted 10 times or 100 times.
| Confidence interval | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of sample: Type of dilution | Difference | Lower value | Upper value | |
| Frozen: DNA 1/10th vs Frozen: DNA 1/100th | -2.76 | -4.79 | -0.73 | 0.003 |
| Frozen: DNA 1/100th vs Dry: DNA 1/100th | -5.63 | -7.53 | -3.72 | < 0.0001 |
| Frozen: DNA 1/100th vs Dry: DNA 1/10th | -4.94 | -7.14 | -2.72 | < 0.0001 |
| Frozen: DNA 1/10th vs Dry: DNA 1/100th | -2.87 | -4.69 | -1.04 | 0.0004 |
| Frozen: DNA 1/10th vs Dry: DNA 1/10th | -2.18 | -4.31 | -0.03 | 0.045 |
| Dry: DNA 1/10th vs Dry: DNA 1/100th | 0.69 | -1.32 | 2.71 | 0.81 |
Type of dilution: DNA 1/10th (raw DNA diluted 10 times) or DNA 1/100th (raw DNA diluted 100 times).
Difference: Ct mean differences between treatments.
Fig 3Decision flowchart for PCR detection of tropical strains of Foc race 4 using FWB- TR4 and 18S uni F/R/P primers.