| Literature DB >> 28178315 |
Azam F Tayabali1, Gordon Coleman1, Jennifer Crosthwait1, Kathy C Nguyen1, Yan Zhang1, Philip Shwed1.
Abstract
A microbial bioremediation product (MBP) used for large-scale oil degradation was investigated for microbial constituents and possible pathogenicity. Aerobic growth on various media yielded >108 colonies mL-1. Full-length 16S rDNA sequencing and fatty acid profiling from morphologically distinct colonies revealed ≥13 distinct genera. Full-length 16S rDNA library sequencing, by either Sanger or long-read PacBio technology, suggested that up to 21% of the MBP was composed of Arcobacter. Other high abundance microbial constituents (>6%) included the genera Proteus, Enterococcus, Dysgonomonas and several genera in the order Bacteroidales. The MBP was most susceptible to ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, gentamicin, and meropenam. MBP exposure of human HT29 and A549 cells caused significant cytotoxicity, and bacterial growth and adherence. An acellular MBP filtrate was also cytotoxic to HT29, but not A549. Both MBP and filtrate exposures elevated the neutrophil chemoattractant IL-8. In endotracheal murine exposures, bacterial pulmonary clearance was complete after one-week. Elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, and chemokines KC and MCP-1 occurred between 2h and 48h post-exposure, followed by restoration to baseline levels at 96h. Cytokine/chemokine signalling was accompanied by elevated blood neutrophils and monocytes at 4h and 48h, respectively. Peripheral acute phase response markers were maximal at 24h. All indicators examined returned to baseline values by 168h. In contrast to HT29, but similar to A549 observations, MBP filtrate did not induce significant murine effects with the indicators examined. The results demonstrated the potentially complex nature of MBPs and transient immunological effects during exposure. Products containing microbes should be scrutinized for pathogenic components and subjected to characterisation and quality validation prior to commercial release.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28178315 PMCID: PMC5298331 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Identification of selective agar isolates (10 days at 21°C).
| Selective Agar (cfu mL-1) | Distinguishing Colony Characteristics | 16S rDNA RDP Identification (Similarity Score) | 16S rDNA Microseq Identification (% Identity) | FAME Identification (Similarity Index) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrate (2.8 x 105) |
light grey dark blue |
Enterobacter species (1.000) Citrobacter koseri (0.997) |
Enterobacter asburiae (99.7) Citrobacter koseri (99.5) |
NA Enterobacter cloacae (0.892) |
| MacConkey (2 x 107) |
mucoid, grey mucoid, yellow/red (Oxoid) yellow (Oxoid) yellow/red (Oxoid); positive (Difco) fine film appearance |
Citrobacter amalonaticus (0.998) Klebsiella pneumonia (1.000) Ochrobactrum anthropi (1.000) Escherichia coli (0.999) Swine fecal bacterium (0.994) |
Citrobacter amalonaticus (99.8) Klebsiella pneumonia (99.9) Ochrobactrum anthropi (99.5) Escherichia coli (99.5) Proteus penneri (99.2) |
Escherichia coli (0.882) Proteus vulgaris (0.669) Ochrobactrum anthropi (0.994) Escherichia coli (0.562) NA |
| Mannitol (1.9 x 104) |
white yellow/tan |
Jeotgalicoccus species (0.995) Arthrobacter creatinolyticus (0.995) |
Macrococcus caseolyticus (91.6) Arthrobacter protophormiae (98.3) |
Bacillus alcalophilus (0.456) Arthrobacter globiformis (0.494) |
| Sabouraud (6 x 107) |
abundant off-white mucoid |
Citrobacter or Enterobacter (0.965) Enterococcus sanguinicola (0.996) |
Enterococcus durans (99.2) Leclercia adecarboxylata (99.0) |
Enterococcus mundii (0.419) NA |
| 5% Sheep Blood (1.8 x 108) |
Hemolytic, grey hemolytic, white/cream weakly hemolytic, small weakly haemolytic, greyish non-hemolytic, small, dark hemolytic |
Bacillus cereus/thuringiensis (1.000) Aquamicrobium lusatiense (0.997) Enterococcus avium (0.930) Escherichia coli (1.000) Enterococcus species (0.998) Enterococcus durans (1.000) |
Bacillus thuringiensis (99.8) Labrys monachus (96.0) Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (97.5) Escherichia fergusonii (99.8) Enterococcus saccharolyticus (97.2) Enterococcus durans (99.2) |
Bacillus cereus (0.550) Ochrobactrum anthropic (0.567) Enterococcus avium Escherichia coli (0.554) NA Enterococcus mundii (0.419) |
| 100% Sheep Blood (4.8 x 107) |
non-hemolytic, shiny grey hemolytic, grey small colonies weakly haemolytic, greyish non-hemolytic, small, red non-hemolytic, shiny, grey |
Bacillus species (0.999) Bacillus cereus (1.000) Enterococcus species (0.995) Bacillus cereus (1.000) Paracoccus solventivoran (0.998) Ochrobactrum species (0.999) |
Bacillus fusiformis (96.2) Bacillus thuringiensis (99.8) Pseudomonas oleovorans (95.5) Bacillus cereus (99.9) Filomicrobium fusiforme (96.6) Ochrobactrum anthropic (99.5) |
Bacillus GC group 22 (0.383) Bacillus cereus (0.550) NA NA NA Ochrobactrum anthropic (0.994) |
| Starch (1.6 x 108) |
white small colonies cream colored abundant radial pattern, ovoid shaped, small white radial pattern, ovoid shaped yellow |
Bacillus or Lysinibacillus (0.980) Enterococcus species (0.998) Paracoccus solventivorans (0.998) Enterococcus species (0.999) Vavococcus fluvialis (1.000) Bacillus species (0.999) Proteus vulgaris (0.998) Arthrobacter creatinolyticus (0.978) |
Bacillus fusiformis (96.2) Enterococcus durans (99.2) Filomicrobium fusiforme (95.9) Enterococcus saccharolyticus Vagococcus fluvialis (99.9) Bacillus fusiformis (99.5) Proteus penneri (99.2) Arthrobacter protophormiae (96.8) |
Bacillus GC group 22 (0.383) Enterococcus mundii (0.419) NA NA NA Bacillus sphaericius (0.673) NA Arthrobacter globiformis (0.604) |
| Triple Sugar Iron (1.8 x 108) |
small abundant wave-like growth |
Enterococcus avium (0.999) Enterococcus species (1.000) Proteus species (1.000) |
Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (97.5) Enterococcus durans (99.2) Proteus penneri (99.2) |
Enterococcus avium Enterococcus mundii (0.419) NA |
| Trypticase Soy Broth (8.8 x 107) |
grey off-white abundant, small grey abundant, white, convex abundant |
Bacillus cereus (1.000) Lysinibacillus fusiformis (0.999) Enterococcus species (1.000) Enterococcus species (1.000) Enterococcus sanguinicola (0.999) |
Bacillus thuringiensis (99.8) Bacillus fusiformis (99.95) Enterococcus raffinosus (98.6) Enterococcus durans (99.2) Enterococcus durans (99.1) |
Bacillus cereus (0.550) Bacillus sphaericus (0.906) Enterococcus faecium (0.283) Enterococcus mundii (0.419) Suttonella (0.346) |
ASimilarity Score is the pairwise sequence identity calculated using a pairwise sequence alignment
BSimilarity Index is the closeness of the bacterial fatty acid profile relative to the MIDI library entries
CNA—Data not available.
Fig 1Taxonomic diversity and phylogenetic classification of MBPs.
(A) Taxonomic diversity comparison of metagenomic data derived by Sanger sequencing of cloned 16S rDNA fragments (Manual; n = 103) compared with data derived from PacBio circular consensus sequencing (PacBio; n = 95,418) using the same taxonomic assignments. (B) Summary of phylogenetic classification at the family and genus level derived by PacBio circular consensus sequencing.
Fig 2Antibiotic susceptibility.
Two different antimicrobial assay formats were tested. Figure A shows resulting microbial growth on quadrant plates (Remel Synergy Quad®) containing BHI-agar with no antibiotic, 500 μg mL-1 gentamicin, 2000 μg/mL streptomycin, and 6 μg mL-1 vancomycin. Figs B and C demonstrate a colorimetric dilution method using MTT to highlight viable microorganisms. Each data point represents the mean of four separate experiments ± standard deviation.
Fig 3HT29 cytotoxicity and cytokine response.
HT29 cells were exposed to 106 cfu in 100 μL of MBP or its filtrate (1/20 dilution) either in the absence (A) or presence (B) of the broad-spectrum antibiotic, gentamicin. At various times, HT29 cells were assessed for metabolic activity using the MTT bioreduction assay. Supernatants from these exposures were tested for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. (C) Photomicrograph demonstrating the adherence of bacteria to HT29 cells and the culture well surface. (D) IL-8 was found to be significantly elevated in response to some exposures in comparison to LPS positive controls isolated from Pseudomonas (LPS-P) and Escherichia (LPS-E). Each data point represents a representative experiment done in duplicate ± standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistically different values compared to saline-treated controls (p<0.05).
Fig 4A549 cytotoxicity and cytokine response.
A549 cells were exposed to dilutions in of MBP or its filtrate (1/20 dilution) either in the absence (A and B) or presence (C) of the broad-spectrum antibiotic, gentamicin. At various times, A549 cells were assessed for metabolic activity using the MTT bioreduction (A) or the Trypan Blue dye exclusion (B) assays. Supernatants from these exposures were tested for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. (C) Cytokines and chemokines were found to be significantly elevated in response to some exposures. Each data point represents a representative experiment done in duplicate ± standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistically different values compared to saline-treated controls (p<0.05).
Fig 5Pulmonary clearance of the MBP from Balb/c mice.
Mice were exposed to 1.25x107 cfu in 25 μL of MBP. At various times post-exposure, a subset of animals was euthanized. Portions of lungs were excised, homogenized, and spread plated onto LB-agar plates. The numbers of resulting microbial colonies after 24h incubation is shown. The box-whisker plots show the following: The horizontal line within each box represents the median from six animal treatments. Lower and upper boundaries of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles.
Fig 6Changes in pulmonary cytokines following exposure.
Mice were exposed to 1.25x107 cfu in 25 μL of MBP. At various times post-exposure, a subset of animals was euthanized. Portions of lungs were excised, homogenized, and levels of IL-1β (A), IL-6 (B), TNF-α (C), KC (D), and MCP-1 (E) were measured. The designation ‘24F’ in the x-axis represents 24h post MBP filtrate exposure. The box-whisker plots show the following: The horizontal line within each box represents the median from six animal treatments. Lower and upper boundaries of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Asterisks indicate statistically different values compared to saline-treated controls (p<0.05).
Fig 7Changes in blood leukocytes following exposure.
Mice were exposed to 1.25x107 cfu in 25 μL of MBP. At various times post-exposure, a subset of animals was euthanized. Blood was collected and levels of neutrophils (A), lymphocytes (B), monocytes (C), eosinophils (D), and basophils (E) were measured using a haematology analyser. The designation ‘24F’ in the x-axis represents 24h post MBP filtrate exposure. The box-whisker plots show the following: The horizontal line within each box represents the median from six animal treatments. Lower and upper boundaries of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Asterisks indicate statistically different values compared to saline-treated controls (p<0.05).
Fig 8Changes in acute phase response proteins following exposure.
Mice were exposed to 1.25x107 cfu in 25 μL of MBP. At various times post-exposure, a subset of animals was euthanized. Blood was collected and levels of fibrinogen (A) and serum amyloid A (B) were measured by ELISA. The designation ‘24F’ in the x-axis represents 24h post MBP filtrate exposure. The box-whisker plots show the following: The horizontal line within each box represents the median from six animal treatments. Lower and upper boundaries of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Asterisks indicate statistically different values compared to saline-treated controls (p<0.05).
Infections associated with cultivable microbes identified in MBP.
| MBP Microbe | Clinical Manifestation | Species Implicated | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foodborne gastrointestinal illnesses; diarrhoea | [ | ||
| Gastrointestinal illness; diarrhoea; ocular infections; nosocomial infections; other local and systemic infections | [ | ||
| Foodborne gastrointestinal illnesses; diarrhoea; intestinal inflammation | Enterotoxigenic | [ | |
| Associated with poly-microbial intra-abdominal infections, peritonitis following appendix rupture; isolated from subcutaneous wound; cellulitis; septicaemia | [ | ||
| Urinary tract infections, hepatobiliary sepsis, bacteremia, endocarditis | [ | ||
| Pneumonia; urinary tract infections, nosocomial infections | [ | ||
| Rheumatoid arthritis; endopthalmitis, endocarditis | [ |
Fig 9Summary of immunological markers during exposure.
Markers measured during experiments were expressed relative to control values. Data points represent median values obtained from six replicate mice. Error bars have been omitted for clarity, but the variability of this data is represented in Figs 4, 5 and 6.