| Literature DB >> 28178216 |
Kwangjae Lee1, Young-Seok Shim2, Young Geun Song3, Soo Deok Han4,5, Youn-Sung Lee6, Chong-Yun Kang7,8.
Abstract
A fire detector is the most important component in a fire alarm system. Herein, we present the feasibility of a highly sensitive and rapid response gas sensor based on metal oxides as a high performance fire detector. The glancing angle deposition (GLAD) technique is used to make the highly porous structure such as nanocolumns (NCs) of various metal oxides for enhancing the gas-sensing performance. To measure the fire detection, the interface circuitry for our sensors (NiO, SnO₂, WO₃ and In₂O₃ NCs) is designed. When all the sensors with various metal-oxide NCs are exposed to fire environment, they entirely react with the target gases emitted from Poly(vinyl chlorides) (PVC) decomposed at high temperature. Before the emission of smoke from the PVC (a hot-plate temperature of 200 °C), the resistances of the metal-oxide NCs are abruptly changed and SnO₂ NCs show the highest response of 2.1. However, a commercial smoke detector did not inform any warning. Interestingly, although the NiO NCs are a p-type semiconductor, they show the highest response of 577.1 after the emission of smoke from the PVC (a hot-plate temperature of 350 °C). The response time of SnO₂ NCs is much faster than that of a commercial smoke detector at the hot-plate temperature of 350 °C. In addition, we investigated the selectivity of our sensors by analyzing the responses of all sensors. Our results show the high potential of a gas sensor based on metal-oxide NCs for early fire detection.Entities:
Keywords: fire detection; gas sensor; nanostructures
Year: 2017 PMID: 28178216 PMCID: PMC5336125 DOI: 10.3390/s17020303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematics of (a) the wafer-scale fabrication procedure for highly sensitive gas sensors based on metal-oxide NCs; (b) a design of Pt IDEs with sensing area; and (c) metal-oxide NCs grown I the direction of the vapor flux; (d) Photograph of 4 in wafer fully covered with Pt-IDEs patterns; (e) Thermographic images showing temperature variation in the Pt-IDEs-patterned substrate at 4 V. Inset shows photograph of our sensor on micro-heater and its cap.
Figure 2Plain-view SEM images of the (a) NiO; (b) WO3; (c) SnO2 and (d) In2O3 NCs; (e–h) show cross-sectional SEM images of (a–d), respectively.
Figure 3X-ray diffraction pattern of the (a) NiO; (b) WO3; (c) SnO2 and (d) In2O3.
Figure 4(a) Interface circuitry and block diagram of the fire detection module with metal-oxide gas sensors; (b) flow chart of the decision process.
Figure 5Photographs of test environment and results; (a) a chamber for gas-sensing measurement and (b) the signal processing circuits with the integrated sensors; (c–f) PVC deformation at varying hot-plate temperatures (50 °C, 100 °C, 200 °C and 350 °C).
Figure 6Real-time transient response of all samples (SnO2, NiO, WO3 and In2O3) at different hot-plate temperatures: (a) 50 °C, (b) 100 °C, (c) 200 °C and (d) 350 °C. Responses of all samples at hot-plate temperatures of (e) 200 °C and (f) 350 °C.
Figure 7Normalized transient response curves of all samples (SnO2, NiO, WO3 and In2O3) and commercial sensor at different hot-plate temperatures: (a) 200 °C and (b) 350 °C.