OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the MRI appearance of the irreversible electroporation zone in porcine liver, with histopathologic correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine irreversible electroporation ablations were percutaneously created in two Yorkshire pigs. Irreversible electroporation was performed with a bipolar 16-gauge electrode with 3-cm exposure tip and fixed 8-mm interpolar distance. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3-T MRI was performed 50 hours after irreversible electroporation. Livers were harvested immediately after MRI for histopathologic analysis. Ablation zone size was measured on each pulse sequence and correlated with pathologic ablation zone size. Qualitative MRI features of the ablation zone were assessed, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. Statistical analysis included Pearson correlation and t tests. RESULTS: Histopathologically, three distinct layers were present in the irreversible electroporation ablation zone: an inner layer of coagulative necrosis (hyperintense at T1- and T2-weighted imaging and nonenhancing), a middle layer of congestion and hemorrhage (hypointense at T1-weighted imaging, hyperintense at T2-weighted imaging and DWI, and progressively enhancing but hypointense at the hepatobiliary phase), and a peripheral layer of inflammation (hyperintense at the arterial phase but isointense at all other sequences). The hepatobiliary phase ablation zone size showed the highest correlation with the pathologic ablation zone size (r = 0.973). This correlation was significant (p < 0.001). T2-weighted imaging had the highest lesion-to-normal tissue CNR. CONCLUSION: The irreversible electroporation ablation zone contains three distinct histopathologic zones, each with unique MRI features. T2-weighted imaging had the highest CNR, and the hepatobiliary phase had the strongest correlation with ablation zone size.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the MRI appearance of the irreversible electroporation zone in porcine liver, with histopathologic correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine irreversible electroporation ablations were percutaneously created in two Yorkshire pigs. Irreversible electroporation was performed with a bipolar 16-gauge electrode with 3-cm exposure tip and fixed 8-mm interpolar distance. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3-T MRI was performed 50 hours after irreversible electroporation. Livers were harvested immediately after MRI for histopathologic analysis. Ablation zone size was measured on each pulse sequence and correlated with pathologic ablation zone size. Qualitative MRI features of the ablation zone were assessed, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated. Statistical analysis included Pearson correlation and t tests. RESULTS: Histopathologically, three distinct layers were present in the irreversible electroporation ablation zone: an inner layer of coagulative necrosis (hyperintense at T1- and T2-weighted imaging and nonenhancing), a middle layer of congestion and hemorrhage (hypointense at T1-weighted imaging, hyperintense at T2-weighted imaging and DWI, and progressively enhancing but hypointense at the hepatobiliary phase), and a peripheral layer of inflammation (hyperintense at the arterial phase but isointense at all other sequences). The hepatobiliary phase ablation zone size showed the highest correlation with the pathologic ablation zone size (r = 0.973). This correlation was significant (p < 0.001). T2-weighted imaging had the highest lesion-to-normal tissue CNR. CONCLUSION: The irreversible electroporation ablation zone contains three distinct histopathologic zones, each with unique MRI features. T2-weighted imaging had the highest CNR, and the hepatobiliary phase had the strongest correlation with ablation zone size.
Authors: Anna J Shangguan; Chong Sun; Bin Wang; Liang Pan; Quanhong Ma; Su Hu; Jia Yang; Aydin Eresen; Yuri Velichko; Vahid Yaghmai; Zhuoli Zhang Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Melvin F Lorenzo; Suyashree P Bhonsle; Christopher B Arena; Rafael V Davalos Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Anna J Shangguan; Kang Zhou; Jia Yang; Aydin Eresen; Bin Wang; Chong Sun; Liang Pan; Su Hu; Ali T Khan; Samdeep K Mouli; Vahid Yaghmai; Zhuoli Zhang Journal: Clin Exp Gastroenterol Date: 2020-11-06
Authors: Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Simona Salati; Antonella Petrillo; Elio Di Bernardo; Roberta Grassi; Raffaele Palaia; Ginevra Danti; Michelearcangelo La Porta; Matteo Cadossi; Gorana Gašljević; Gregor Sersa; Francesco Izzo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Wolf Bäumler; Andreas Schicho; Jan Schaible; Niklas Verloh; Karin Senk; Phillip Wiggermann; Christian Stroszczynski; Lukas Phillip Beyer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 3.240