| Literature DB >> 28176881 |
Lawrence Vernetti1,2, Albert Gough1,2, Nicholas Baetz3, Sarah Blutt4, James R Broughman4, Jacquelyn A Brown5, Jennifer Foulke-Abel3, Nesrin Hasan3, Julie In3, Edward Kelly6, Olga Kovbasnjuk3, Jonathan Repper7, Nina Senutovitch1, Janet Stabb3, Catherine Yeung8,9, Nick C Zachos3, Mark Donowitz3, Mary Estes4, Jonathan Himmelfarb9,10, George Truskey7, John P Wikswo5,11, D Lansing Taylor1,2,12.
Abstract
Organ interactions resulting from drug, metabolite or xenobiotic transport between organs are key components of human metabolism that impact therapeutic action and toxic side effects. Preclinical animal testing often fails to predict adverse outcomes arising from sequential, multi-organ metabolism of drugs and xenobiotics. Human microphysiological systems (MPS) can model these interactions and are predicted to dramatically improve the efficiency of the drug development process. In this study, five human MPS models were evaluated for functional coupling, defined as the determination of organ interactions via an in vivo-like sequential, organ-to-organ transfer of media. MPS models representing the major absorption, metabolism and clearance organs (the jejunum, liver and kidney) were evaluated, along with skeletal muscle and neurovascular models. Three compounds were evaluated for organ-specific processing: terfenadine for pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity; trimethylamine (TMA) as a potentially toxic microbiome metabolite; and vitamin D3. We show that the organ-specific processing of these compounds was consistent with clinical data, and discovered that trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) crosses the blood-brain barrier. These studies demonstrate the potential of human MPS for multi-organ toxicity and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME), provide guidance for physically coupling MPS, and offer an approach to coupling MPS with distinct media and perfusion requirements.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28176881 PMCID: PMC5296733 DOI: 10.1038/srep42296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Microphysiological Systems Used for Functional Coupling.
| Intestine | SQL-SAL Liver | BBB/NVU | Proximal Tubule Kidney | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell Types | Differentiated human jejunal enteroidsa | Primary hepatocytes, Ea.Hy926 endothelial, macrophage immuneb, LX-2 stellate | Neuronal: iPSC-derived human neurons, pericytes, astrocytes Vascular: HBMVECc | PTK: PTECd VPTK: HUVECe, PTEC |
| Model Type Media volume /24 h | Transwell (Static) 100/600 μl apical/basolateral | MPS MPS: 120 μl Static: 50 μl/well | MPS Vascular: 1440 μl Neuronal: 1440 μl | MPS PTK: 720 μl VPTK: 720 μL |
| Sampling: Terfenadine TMA Vitamin D3 | 24 h 24 h 24 h | 24 h 24 h 72 h | 24 h 12 h 24 h | VPTK: 6 h VPTK: 6 h (Vas. PTC) PTK: 0–48; 48–120 h |
| Media | EM | HMM | Vascular Media Neuronal Media | PTEC Vas. PTEC |
| Functional Coupling Media |
EM: Advanced DMEM/F12 + Wnt3a, R-spondin 1, Noggin, EGF/EM minus Wnt3a.
HMM: Williams E, 1.25 μg/ml albumin, 100 ng/ml insulin, 100 nM dexamethasone.
aMature enterocytes enteroendocrine, and goblet cells.
bPMA differentiated U937 cells.
cHuman brain microvascular endothelial cells.
dPrimary human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells.
eHuman umbilical vein endothelial cells.
Figure 1Schematic representations of the four of the organ systems used for functional coupling.
(A) The intestinal module is constructed in transwells from primary jejunum enteroids. Test agents are applied in the apical compartment <1>. The media collected in the basolateral compartment <2> is used to add to the liver. (B) Media from the jejunum intestine basolateral compartment <2> is perfused as a 1:3 jejunum/naïve liver media into the influx port of the SQL-SAL liver model <3>. Efflux media is collected <4> and used to add to two downstream organ models. (C) The vascularized kidney proximal tubule module is a two lumen, dual perfusion system. For the vascular compartment, jejunum/liver-conditioned media <4> is diluted 1:2 or 1:4 with naïve EGM-2 media and then perfused into the influx port <5> to collect effluent from the proximal tubule at <6>. In parallel with perfusion through the vascular compartment, the proximal tubule compartment is perfused with naïve DMEM/F12 PTEC media <6> for effluent collection. (D) The blood-brain barrier with NVU is constructed in a membrane-separated, two-chambered microfluidic device. The brain-derived endothelial vascular compartment is perfused at the influx port <7> with jejunum/liver-conditioned media <4> diluted 1:4 with naïve EGM-2 media. The effluent is collected at the efflux port <7>. In parallel with perfusion through the vascular compartment, the neuronal cell compartment is perfused with naïve EBM-2 media at the influx port <8> for effluent collection at <8>.
Figure 2Work flow for functional coupling experiments.
Terfenadine exposure is used as an example; TMA and vitamin D3 experiments followed essentially the same workflow. The test compound is initially added to the apical gut media and samples are collected from the apical and basolateral media for MS analysis. Basolateral media samples are sent to UPitt where they are mixed with liver media for exposure in the liver module. Effluent samples are taken for MS analysis and sent to UWash and Vanderbilt where they are mixed with kidney and NVU media, respectively. Samples are taken of the effluent from the kidney proximal tubule module and from the vascular and brain sides of the NVU for MS analysis.
Figure 3Functional analysis of terfenadine transport and metabolism in human organs.
Terfenadine taken orally is absorbed and metabolized to fexofenadine in the intestine. Counter-transport carries fexofenadine back to the apical side of the intestinal wall. Remaining terfenadine is metabolized to fexofenadine in the liver. Fexofenadine is not able to cross the blood-brain barrier and is excreted by the kidney.
Figure 4Effect of functional integration on terfenadine toxicity.
Pre-conditioned terfenadine in the static liver model results in decreased effect on skeletal myobundles. Results are for one donor, N = 3 and presented as Mean ± S.D. *p < 0.05, #p < 0.01.
Figure 5Functional analysis of TMA transport and metabolism in human organs.
TMA produced in the intestine by the endogenous microbiome is taken up and transported to the liver, where it is metabolized to TMAO. Kidney disease can lead to increased plasma concentrations of TMAO, with significant medical side effects.
Figure 6Functional analysis of Vitamin D3 transport and metabolism in human organs.
Absorption and activation of Vitamin D3 requires transport and metabolism in multiple organs. Sequential metabolism in the liver and the kidney leads to a series of active metabolites. Vitamin D3 and its metabolites are hydrophobic and therefore can easily be lost in MPS systems due to binding to materials like PDMS. Use of a carrier protein is important in MPS devices for physiological relevance.
Key Concordances Between MPS and Clinical Fate for Three Test Agents.
| Test Agent/ | Clinical MPS Model | Intestine | Liver | Kidney | BBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uptake & Transport | > 95% | ||||
| Uptake & Transport | ~46% | 26% | |||
| < 1% Bio T < 95% | 11% | ~0% | |||
| < 1.4% Bio T (est.) < 80% | ~ 1% | ~ 0% | |||
| Uptake & Transport No metabolism | |||||
| Uptake & Transport No metabolism | 0.4% |
Key: Uptake - by jejunum endothelial cells; Transport - from apical to basolateral media; → = Metabolism; CounterTrans = Transport from basolateral to apical media; est. = estimated.
Excreted - into proximal tubule lumen; LOQ = limit of quantitation; Penetration - through blood-brain barrier.
Key Biological Challenges For Direct Physical Coupling 4 MPS Organs.
| Key Biological Challenges |
|---|
| Implementing a universal medium |
| Proper scaling of MPS models to reproduce maximal functions |
| Further developing intestine in MPS device |
| Implementing a combination of real-time fluorescent labeled biosensors in multiple organs |
| Establishing a source of renewable adult iPSC for all/most cell types to provide single donor disease phenotype cells and to overcome current need to mix primary cells or established cell lines from genetically diverse sources |
| Vascularization of all MPS models |
Key Technical Challenges For Direct Coupling 4 MPS Organs.
| Key Technical and Platform Integration Challenges |
|---|
| Minimizing drug/biomolecule binding to PDMS, tubing, membranes and devices made from various materials |
| Minimizing connection volumes and bubbles while maintaining sterile conditions |
| Creating oxygenation conditions for each organ, including different oxygenation on apical and basolateral surface of intestine and zonation in the liver |
| Creating optimal flow rate in each MPS organ |
| Establishing PK analytics and modeling from data captured in database |
| Integrating dynamic, chemical and electrical cues, including contributions of missing organ systems |