Literature DB >> 28176514

Comparison of hepatectomy with or without hepatic inflow occlusion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience.

Jing-Hang Jiang1,2, Kai-Xiu Wang3, Ji-Ye Zhu4, Pei-Pei Yang2, Zhe Guo5, Song-Lin Ma2, Yang Lü2, Bang-De Xiang6, Jian-Hong Zhong1, Le-Qun Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The negative effects of hepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) on postoperative liver function of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver resection have been reported. Nevertheless, whether or not HIO could influence the long-term outcomes remains unclear.
METHODS: A total of 396 patients were included in this study and divided into without occlusion (WO) group (N.=112) and HIO group (N.=284). Aiming to minimize influence of selection bias and confounding variables, we used propensity score matching (PSM) of a 0.2 caliper to balance baseline variables. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: PSM were used to generate 101 pairs of patients. After PSM, OS was not significantly different between WO and HIO group (1-year: 86.1% vs. 83.2%; 3-year: 61.4% vs. 61.4%; 5-year: 45.5% vs. 39.6%; P = 0.626). Similar results of DFS were obtained between WO and HIO group (1-year: 54.5% vs. 53.5%; 3-year: 30.5% vs. 28.7%; 5-year: 14.2% vs. 14.9%; P=0.873). WO and HIO groups did not differ in 30-day, 90-day mortality and rate of postoperative complications (all P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicates that HIO might not negatively affect the OS and DFS of HCC patients undergoing liver resection and is likely to be a safe and viable option for intraoperative blood loss control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28176514     DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.17.04788-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Med        ISSN: 0026-4806            Impact factor:   4.806


  5 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of combined α-fetoprotein and CA19-9 for hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Shang Dong Qin; Yan Li; Fei Lu; Wen Feng Gong; Jian Hong Zhong; Liang Ma; Jing Fei Zhao; Guo Hua Zhan; Peng Zhan Li; Bin Song; Bang De Xiang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.253

2.  Meta-analysis of the effect of the pringle maneuver on long-term oncological outcomes following liver resection.

Authors:  Elias Khajeh; Saeed Shafiei; Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh; Ali Ramouz; Ahmed Hammad; Omid Ghamarnejad; Mohammed Al-Saeedi; Nuh Rahbari; Christoph Reissfelder; Arianeb Mehrabi; Pascal Probst; Hani Oweira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Shorter Survival after Liver Pedicle Clamping in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Revealed by a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Wassmer; Beat Moeckli; Thierry Berney; Christian Toso; Lorenzo A Orci
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Feng Xia; Zhiyuan Huang; Elijah Ndhlovu; Mingyu Zhang; Xiaoping Chen; Bixiang Zhang; Peng Zhu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion.

Authors:  Hong-Hao Li; Liang Ma; Bang-De Xiang; Lu-Nan Qi; Le-Qun Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.