Literature DB >> 28176407

Types, frequencies, and burden of nonspecific adverse events of drugs: analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Alfred Mahr1,2, Clara Golmard1, Emilie Pham3, Laura Iordache1, Laure Deville3, Pierre Faure3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Scarce studies analyzing adverse event (AE) data from randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (RPCCTs) of selected illnesses suggested that a substantial proportion of collected AEs are unrelated to the drug taken. This study analyzed the nonspecific AEs occurring with active-drug exposure in RPCCTs for a large range of medical conditions.
METHODS: Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials published in five prominent medical journals during 2006-2012 were searched. Only trials that evaluated orally or parenterally administered active drugs versus placebo in a head-to-head setting were selected. For AEs reported from ≥10 RPCCTs, Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to determine the relationship between AE rates in placebo and active-drug recipients. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to compute proportions of nonspecific AEs, which were truncated at a maximum of 100%, in active-drug recipients.
RESULTS: We included 231 trials addressing various medical domains or healthy participants. For the 88 analyzed AE variables, AE rates for placebo and active-drug recipients were in general strongly correlated (r > 0.50) or very strongly correlated (r > 0.80). The pooled proportions of nonspecific AEs for the active-drug recipients were 96.8% (95%CI: 95.5-98.1) for any AEs, 100% (97.9-100) for serious AEs, and 77.7% (72.7-83.2) for drug-related AEs. Results were similar for individual medical domains and healthy participants. The pooled proportion of nonspecificity of 82 system organ class and individual AE types ranged from 38% to 100%.
CONCLUSION: The large proportion of nonspecific AEs reported in active-drug recipients of RPCCTs, including serious and drug-related AEs, highlights the limitations of clinical trial data to determine the tolerability of drugs.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse drug reaction; adverse events; nocebo; pharmacoepidemiology; placebo; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28176407     DOI: 10.1002/pds.4169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  18 in total

1.  [Biosimilars and the nocebo effect].

Authors:  J Braun; S Tsiami; B Buehring; D Kiefer; I Andreica; X Baraliakos; U Kiltz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  The Amplification of Symptoms in the Medically Ill.

Authors:  Arthur J Barsky; David A Silbersweig
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  The Unintended Consequences of Adverse Event Information on Medicines' Risks and Label Content.

Authors:  Giovanni Furlan; David Power
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2020-11-16

4.  Informing About the Nocebo Effect Affects Patients' Need for Information About Antidepressants-An Experimental Online Study.

Authors:  Yvonne Nestoriuc; Yiqi Pan; Timm Kinitz; Ella Weik; Meike C Shedden-Mora
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Medicine-related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study.

Authors:  Rebecca K Webster; John Weinman; G James Rubin
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-02-05

6.  Minimizing Drug Adverse Events by Informing About the Nocebo Effect-An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Yiqi Pan; Timm Kinitz; Marin Stapic; Yvonne Nestoriuc
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Understanding and Preventing Health Concerns About Emerging Mobile Health Technologies.

Authors:  Frank T Materia; Kate Faasse; Joshua M Smyth
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 8.  Rapid overview of systematic reviews of nocebo effects reported by patients taking placebos in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jeremy Howick; Rebecca Webster; Nigel Kirby; Kerry Hood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Using Positive Attribute Framing to Attenuate Nocebo Side Effects: A Cybersickness Study.

Authors:  Alanna Mao; Kirsten Barnes; Louise Sharpe; Andrew L Geers; Suzanne G Helfer; Kate Faasse; Ben Colagiuri
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-07-22

10.  Observed and expected serious adverse event rates in randomised clinical trials for hypertension: an observational study comparing trials that do and do not focus on older people.

Authors:  Peter Hanlon; Neave Corcoran; Guy Rughani; Anoop S V Shah; Frances S Mair; Bruce Guthrie; Joanne P Renton; David A McAllister
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.