Literature DB >> 28176374

Assessment of anatomical knowledge: Approaches taken by higher education institutions.

Bipasha Choudhury1, Anthony Freemont1.   

Abstract

Assessment serves the primary function of determining a student's competence in a subject. Several different assessment formats are available for assessing anatomical skills, knowledge and understanding and, as assessment can drive learning, a careful selection of assessments can help to engender the correct deep learning facility required of the safe clinical practitioner. The aim of this review was to survey the published literature to see whether higher education institutions are taking an andragogical approach to assessment. Five databases (EMBASE, ERIC, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) were searched using standardized search terms with two limits applied (English language, and 2000 to the present). Among the 2,094 papers found, 32 were deemed suitable for this review. Current literature on assessment can be categorized into the following themes: assessment driven learning, types of assessments, frequency of assessments, and use of images in assessments. The consensus is to use a variety of methods, written and practical, to assess anatomical knowledge and skill in different domains. Institutions aim for different levels of Bloom's taxonomy for students at similar stages of their medical degree. Formative assessments are used widely, in differing formats, with mostly good effects on the final examination grade. In conclusion, a wide variety of assessments, each aimed at a different level of Bloom's taxonomy, are used by different institutions. Clin. Anat. 30:290-299, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  anatomy; assessment; learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28176374     DOI: 10.1002/ca.22835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  3 in total

1.  Introducing free response short answer questions in anatomy spot tests: experiment study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Alraddadi; Ibrahim Hoja; Haifa Alhawas; Bader Khawaji; Yasser Alharbi; Sajida Agha; Emad Masuadi; Mohi Eldin Magzoub
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Development of a Virtual Three-Dimensional Assessment Scenario for Anatomical Education.

Authors:  Katerina Bogomolova; Amir H Sam; Adam T Misky; Chinmay M Gupte; Paul H Strutton; Thomas J Hurkxkens; Beerend P Hierck
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Kamran Sattar; Tauseef Ahmad; Ashfaq Akram; Mahmoud Salah Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.