Literature DB >> 28176332

Low-dose interleukin-2 promotes STAT-5 phosphorylation, Treg survival and CTLA-4-dependent function in autoimmune liver diseases.

H C Jeffery1, L E Jeffery2, P Lutz1, M Corrigan1,3, G J Webb1,3, G M Hirschfield1,3, D H Adams1,3, Y H Oo1,3.   

Abstract

CD4+ CD25high CD127low forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3+ ) regulatory T cells (Treg ) are essential for the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. Impaired Treg function and an imbalance between effector and Tregs contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. We reported recently that the hepatic microenvironment is deficient in interleukin (IL)-2, a cytokine essential for Treg survival and function. Consequently, few liver-infiltrating Treg demonstrate signal transducer and activator of transcription-5 (STAT-5) phosphorylation. To establish the potential of IL-2 to enhance Treg therapy, we investigated the effects of very low dose Proleukin (VLDP) on the phosphorylation of STAT-5 and the subsequent survival and function of Treg and T effector cells from the blood and livers of patients with autoimmune liver diseases. VLDP, at less than 5 IU/ml, resulted in selective phosphorylation of STAT-5 in Treg but not effector T cells or natural killer cells and associated with increased expression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), FoxP3 and CD25 and the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in Treg with the greatest enhancement of regulatory phenotype in the effector memory Treg population. VLDP also maintained expression of the liver-homing chemokine receptor CXCR3. VLDP enhanced Treg function in a CTLA-4-dependent manner. These findings open new avenues for future VLDP cytokine therapy alone or in combination with clinical grade Treg in autoimmune liver diseases, as VLDP could not only enhance regulatory phenotype and functional property but also the survival of intrahepatic Treg .
© 2017 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society for Immunology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bcl-2; CTLA-4; STAT-5; autoimmune liver disease; interleukin-2; regulatory T cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28176332      PMCID: PMC5422719          DOI: 10.1111/cei.12940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


Introduction

Naturally occurring CD4+CD25highCD127lowforkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3+) regulatory T cells (Treg) constitute 5–10% of peripheral CD4+ T cells and maintain peripheral self‐tolerance in rodents and humans 1, 2. Functional impairment or quantitative deficiency of Tregs has been described in autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) 3, 4, including those targeted at bile ducts [primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) 5, 6 or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)] and hepatocytes [autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)] 3, 7, 8, 9. Current therapies for AILD are non‐curative, provide unsatisfactory control of hepatic inflammation and require long‐term immunosuppressive medications that carry unfavourable side effects. Thus, autologous Treg therapy is an attractive option for the treatment of AILD that could provide long‐term immune‐regulation without daily medications and global immunosuppression. Treg survival and function is dependent upon interleukin (IL)−2 10, which is required for the maintenance of effective levels of functional Treg in autoimmune diseases 11, 12, 13. The importance of IL‐2 for Treg function has not been studied closely in autoimmune liver diseases. The cell surface receptor for IL‐2 (IL‐2R) is composed of three subunits, alpha (IL‐2RA, CD25), beta (IL‐2RB, CD122) and common gamma (IL‐2RG, CD132). All leucocytes express IL‐2RG constitutively. Natural killer (NK), NK T cells (NK T) and memory CD8+ T cells also express IL‐2RB and Treg express IL‐2RA constitutively. IL‐2RA is required for high‐affinity IL‐2 binding, while IL‐2RB and IL‐2RG transduce the IL‐2 signal 14. Two major signalling pathways conduct IL‐2‐induced responses: signalling from IL‐2RB leads to the activation of the serine/threonine kinase, AKT, and to up‐regulation of anti‐apoptotic molecules such as Bcl‐2, which is required for T cell survival 15. Signalling from IL‐2RG via Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) leads to signal transducer and activator of transcription‐5 (STAT‐5) activation 16, and is needed for T cell proliferation and differentiation and expression of anti‐apoptotic molecules 17, 18. Owing to their high levels of high‐affinity CD25, Treg consume IL‐2 competitively, thereby maintaining their survival and function while suppressing bystander effector cells 19, 20. Where IL‐2 availability is low, such as in the inflamed hepatic microenvironment, Treg function may be compromised and may be inadequate to counteract the activated immune infiltrate. A number of studies have indicated that treatment with IL‐2 could improve immune‐mediated diseases. In rodents, type 1 diabetes mellitus could be prevented by in‐vivo IL‐2 administration 21, 22. In humans, low‐dose IL‐2 therapy enhanced Treg frequencies and improved outcome in graft‐versus‐host disease, vasculitis and type 1 diabetes 11, 23, 24, 25. We recently reported very low levels of IL‐2 in the inflamed human liver 4. Thus, we considered that clinical grade IL‐2 (Proleukin) therapy might be effective in AILD. In this study, we examined the effect of very low dose Proleukin (VLDP) on the biology of both peripheral and intrahepatic Treg, focusing upon regulatory phenotype and function. Successful Treg therapy in AILD would require not only enhancing Treg phenotype and function, but also recruitment of peripheral Treg to the inflamed autoimmune livers. We demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that VLDP selectively enhances Treg STAT‐5 phosphorylation and subsequently up‐regulates functional molecules cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4), CD25, FoxP3 and Treg anti‐apoptosis marker Bcl‐2 in AILD. VLDP also maintains liver homing chemokine receptor CXCR3 expression on Treg. Importantly, VLDP enhances the suppressive function of Treg via CTLA‐4, and anti‐CTLA‐4 can block this effect. Thus, we demonstrated both phenotype and mechanistic effects of VLDP on blood and intrahepatic Treg from AILD patients suggesting that VLDP therapy may enhance immune‐regulatory restoration in AILD.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects in this study. Local Research Ethics Committees (LREC) and the University of Birmingham approved all experimental protocols (South Birmingham LREC reference: 98 CA/5192; Walsall LREC reference: 06/Q2708/11).

Blood and liver tissue

Venous blood, collected in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes, was obtained from healthy (control) individuals and individuals with AILD, including AIH, PBC and PSC. Explanted diseased liver tissue was obtained from patients undergoing liver transplantation for end‐stage AILD including PBC, PSC and AIH/PBC and AIH/PSC overlap diseases.

Isolation of liver infiltrating leucocytes (LIL) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)

LIL were isolated from fresh liver tissue. Briefly, explanted liver tissue was diced into 5 mm3 cubes, washed with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) and then homogenized in a Seward stomacher 400 circulator (260 rpm, 5 min). The homogenate was filtered through fine (63 μm) mesh (John Staniar and Co., Manchester, UK) and the lymphocytes isolated by density gradient separation using Lympholyte (VH Bio, Gateshead, UK) at 800 for 20 min. The lymphocyte layer was collected and washed with PBS. Cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated similarly from whole blood by density gradient separation using Lympholyte.

Culture of PBMC and LIL

PBMC and LIL were cultured in 24‐well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI‐1640 with L‐glutamine medium containing penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 IU/ml), additional glutamine (2 mM) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 10% human AB serum (TCS Biosciences, Buckingham, UK) and supplemented with 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin (Aldesleukin) (Novartis, Camberley, UK).

Surface phenotyping of freshly isolated intrahepatic and peripheral blood lymphocytes with or without Proleukin treatment

Cell phenotypes were examined by flow cytometry. Dead cells were identified by staining with the Zombie NIRTM fixable viability dye (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) or e506 viability dye (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) prior to staining with antibodies. To analyse expression of surface antigens, cells were incubated on ice for 30 min with antibodies against CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD127 and markers of interest or isotype‐matched control antibodies in 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma Aldrich, Poole, UK) diluted in PBS. After washing with 2% FBS (Sigma Aldrich), cells were fixed for 10 min with 3% formaldehyde solution (Sigma Aldrich). To analyse expression of intracellular proteins, cells were fixed and stained using the FoxP3/transcription factor staining set (eBioscience), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Antibodies against surface markers (CD3, CD4, CD8 CD25, CD127) were generally added together with antibodies against intracellular markers of interest during the permeabilization and intracellular staining steps. Data were acquired using a CyAN ADP flow cytometer (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Single fluorophore‐labelled anti‐mouse immunoglobulin (Ig)Gκ/negative control (FBS) compensation particles (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were used for compensation. Data were analysed offline using FlowJo (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). The anti‐human antibodies used in flow cytometric analysis of marker expression included: anti‐CD3‐phycoerythrin‐cyanin 7 (PE‐Cy7) (SK7; BD Biosciences), anti‐CD4‐peridinin chlorophyll (PerCP/Cy5.5 (RPA‐T4; eBioscience), anti‐CD4‐Viogreen (VIT4; Miltenyi Biotec), anti‐CD8‐PE‐CF594 (RPA‐T8; BD Biosciences), anti‐CD25‐BV421 (M‐A251; BD Biosciences), anti‐CD45Ra‐allophycocyanin (APC)‐Vio770 (T6D11; Miltenyi Biotec), anti‐CD127‐fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (eBioRDR5; eBioscience), anti‐CCR7‐PE‐CF594 (150503; BD Biosciences), anti‐granzyme B‐PE (GB11; eBioscience), anti‐CTLA‐4‐PE (BN13; BD Biosciences), anti‐Bcl‐2‐PE (100; BioLegend), anti‐FoxP3‐APC (PCH101; eBioscience) anti‐CD39‐PE (A1; eBioscience), anti‐T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain‐containing‐3 (TIM3)‐PE (F38‐2E2; eBioscience), anti‐OX40‐PE (ACT35; BD Biosciences), anti‐CD69‐PE (FN50; Miltenyi Biotec), anti‐2B4‐PE (REA112; Miltenyi Biotec), anti‐CD73‐APC (AD2; eBioscience), anti‐CD137‐APC (4B4‐1; Miltenyi Biotec), anti‐glucocorticoid‐induced tumour necrosis factor receptor (GITR)‐APC (DT5D3; Miltenyi Biotec), anti‐lymphocyte‐activation gene 3 (LAG3)‐APC (3DS223H; eBioscience) and anti‐PD‐1‐APC (PD1.3.1.3; Miltenyi Biotec).

Analysis of STAT‐5 phosphorylation in response to IL‐2

To examine responsiveness of PBMC or LIL to IL‐2, cells in RPMI were stained with anti‐CD127‐FITC (eBioRDR5; eBioscience), anti‐CD20‐Viogreen (LT20; Miltenyi Biotec) and anti‐CD56‐pacific blue (HCD56; Biolegend) for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then stimulated for 10 min at 37°C with Proleukin (0‐1000 IU/ml). Cells were fixed and permeabilized with BD Biosciences Phosflow buffers I and III according to the manufacturer's instructions then stained for 1 h at room temperature in 2% FBS (Sigma) with anti‐pSTAT‐5 (Y694)‐AlexaFluor 647 (47/STAT‐5), anti‐CD3‐PeCy7 (SK7), anti‐CD8‐PE‐CF594 (RPA‐T8) (all from BD Biosciences), anti‐CD4‐PerCPCy5.5 (RPA‐T4; eBioscience) and anti‐CD25‐PE (3G10; Miltenyi Biotec). All data were acquired using a CyAn ADP (Dako) flow cytometer and analysed using FlowJo (Tree Star) software.

Analysis of suppression of autologous T responder cell division by Treg in response to IL‐2

CD4+CD25+CD127Treg and CD4+CD25CD127+ responder T cells were isolated by flow sorting following prior enrichment of total CD4+ T cells from PBMC using magnetic negative selection (Biolegend). Treg were cultured overnight with or without Proleukin (5 IU/ml). Responder T cells were labelled with cell trace violet (molecular probes; Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and cultured overnight without stimulation. Dendritic cells (DC) were derived from monocytes that were isolated from healthy donor PBMCs by magnetic negative selection (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) and cultured for 5–7 days in IL‐4 (500 IU/ml; Miltenyi Biotec) and granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) (800 IU/ml; Berlex Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA). DCs and Treg were washed to remove cytokines and co‐cultured for 5 days with responder T cells in the presence of 0·5 μg/ml anti‐CD3 (clone OKT3; Biolegend) with or without 40 μg/ml anti‐CTLA‐4. Division of responder T cells under 50 μg/ml CTLA‐4‐Ig (abatacept) was also monitored. Cells were cultured at a ratio of 1 DC : 20 T cells with a 1 Treg : 2·5 responder T cell ratio. At 5 days, cell trace violet dilution was measured by flow cytometry and the statistics percentage division and division index (the average number of cell divisions undergone by a cell in the original population) calculated using the FlowJo proliferation analysis platform.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance between two variables across multiple subsets was tested by two‐way two‐tailed analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni's post‐hoc analysis. Significance between two populations was tested by paired t‐test and between multiple treatments by one way anova with Bonferroni's post‐hoc analysis. Analysis and graphical representation was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5 (GraphPad software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Phosphorylation of STAT‐5 occurs selectively in Treg at very low doses of Proleukin in normal blood

To analyse the responsiveness of different leucocyte populations to IL‐2 (Proleukin) and identify a dose that would phosphorylate STAT‐5 selectively in Treg, we administered Proleukin at doses of between 0 and 1000 IU/ml to PBMC from healthy control bloods and examined phosphorylation of STAT‐5 in Treg and other leucocyte populations: (Fig. 1a and Supporting information, Fig. 1). With the exception of B cells, all cell types responded to Proleukin at 10 IU/ml and above (Fig. 1a). However, at 1 IU/ml, 25% of Treg showed measurable pSTAT‐5 expression, while there was no up‐regulation in pSTAT‐5 in other subsets. More than 75% of Treg demonstrated pSTAT‐5 induction at 10 IU/ml; however, this dose also led to phosphorylation of STAT‐5 in other CD4+ T cells and CD56bright NK cells. Nevertheless, this pSTAT‐5 induction in non‐Tregs at this concentration was barely above baseline, as indicated by pSTAT‐5 median fluorescence intensity (MFI) (Fig. 1a). Most importantly, at 2–4 IU/ml, Treg pSTAT‐5 MFI was 2·3–3·6‐fold above baseline, but there was no increase in pSTAT‐5 MFI for other subsets (Fig. 1a). Thus, we observed that with a very low dose of Proleukin (VLDP) (< 5 IU/ml), selective phosphorylation of STAT‐5 in Treg could be achieved. The characteristics of the control cohort used in these and subsequent phenotyping studies in this paper are given in Table 1.
Figure 1

Very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 up‐regulates phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription‐5 (pSTAT‐5) selectively in peripheral and liver‐infiltrating regulatory T cells (Treg) from patients with autoimmune liver disease. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from control bloods (a, n = 3) or autoimmune liver disease patient bloods [b, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) remission, n = 5; AIH relapse, n = 4; primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), n = 3; and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), n = 3] and liver‐infiltrating lymphocytes from explanted livers of patients with autoimmune liver disease (c, n = 4) were stimulated for 10 min with IL‐2 (Proleukin) at doses in the range 0–1000 IU/ml and the expression of p(Y694) STAT‐5 determined by flow cytometry for each leucocyte population. Graphs summarize pSTAT‐5 expression, quoted as percentage of positive cells or median fluorescence intensity (MFI). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).

Table 1

Demographic, laboratory, histology and treatment details of patients in the peripheral blood cohort

DiseaseAge (years)SexBRASTALTALPNa+CRIgMIgGINRUKELDHistologyTreatment
AIH F28M19782365139680·6171·249Moderate hepatitis, established cirrhosisAzathioprine + tacrolimus + prednisolone
AIH F61F10129125120139710·5251·247Moderate‐ severe activity, F4Mycophenolate
AIH F57F157653114140611·4181·148Moderate hepatitis, F3Azathioprine + prednisolone
AIH F42M3768120104142861·3171·049Moderate hepatitis, established cirrhosisAzathioprine, prednisolone
AIH F64M77212793141870·7171·045Moderate lobular hepatitis, F2Mycophenolate + prednisolone
AIH F24M59167253120138490·7211·253Moderate hepatitis, F3Mycophenolate + prednisolone
AIH R58M19423082142861160·947Moderate lobular inflammatory activity, F2Azathioprine
AIH R46F417876137671·2131·044Mild hepatitis, F2Azathioprine
AIH R51F11262158143721101·045Quiescent AIH, cirrhoticNone
AIH R58F15394090144580·7121·145Quiescent AIH, F1Azathioprine + prednisolone
AIH R45F10161186142670·991·045Mild hepatitis, F1Azathioprine
AIH R35F14221975139581111·148Moderate hepatitis, F3Azathioprine
AIH R54F7212876143661·291·043Moderate hepatitis, F3Mycophenolate + prednisolone
AIH R45F13433684138641201·047Mild hepatitis, F2Azathioprine
AIH R21F1730357014363181·046Mild hepatitis, Established cirrhosisAzathioprine + prednisolone
AIH R57F3252865142820·8121·042Mild hepatitis, F2Mycophenolate + prednisolone
AIH R33F7282446139650·6111·046Mild lobular, hepatitis, F2Mycophenolate + prednisolone
AIH R51F8333393140601·3121·046Mild hepatitis, F1Mycophenolate + prednisolone
AIH R36M11182267141580·8141·245Mild hepatitis, established cirrhosisAzathioprine
AIH R21F11171967141610·881·046Mild hepatitis, F1Mercaptopurine
PBC72F836342101441052·9
PBC63F53220160141833·59·370·943Non‐cirrhoticUrsodeoxycholic acid
PBC51F3911376184142935·616·811·149Non‐cirrhoticUrsodeoxycholic acid
PBC47M13n.a.32220140886·624·881·047Chronic biliary disease, paucity of bile ducts, cirrhosisUrsodeoxycholic acid
PBC63F53220160141833·59·370·943Non‐cirrhoticUDCA
PBC51F3911376184142935·616·811·149Non cirrhoticUDCA
PBC47F132921150142521·7110·641·1462007 ‐ PBC with FNH; no cirrhosisUDCA
PBC58F11n.a.88653138667·1523·631·047n.a.UDCA
PBC41F5202374145681·3112·751·142n.a.UDCA
PBC47F32112129446139577·7813·321·050n.a.UDCA
PSC54F41419297142780·690·842PSC, F2UDCA
PSC43M7015168575139600·8251·254PSC cirrhoticUDCA
PSC77M32110641361180·6100·945PSC, F2UDCA
Control45M81218n.a.13369n.a.n.a.0·949n.a.None
Control56F4820n.a.14074n.a.17·071·043n.a.None
Control60M104155n.a.145105n.a.15·751·144n.a.None
Control49M181613n.a.14185n.a.10·111·148n.a.None
Control60M31216n.a.13976n.a.N/An.a.n.a.n.a.None
Control67F93328n.a.14064n.a.n.a.1·146n.a.None
Control42M62421n.a.13572n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.None
Control76M63227n.a.14379n.a.12·71n.a.n.a.n.a.None
Control41M632612n.a.14093n.a.9·19n.a.n.a.n.a.None

AIH R = autoimmune hepatitis in remission; AIH F = autoimmune hepatitis in flare up/relapse; PSC = primary sclerosing cholangitis; PBC = primary biliary cholangitis; AST = aspartate transaminase; ALT = alanine transaminase; ALP = alkaline phosphatase BR = bilirubin; Na+ = sodium; CR = creatinine; UKELD = United Kingdom End Stage Liver Disease Scoring; UDCA = ursodeoxycholic acid; n.a. = not available.

Very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 up‐regulates phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription‐5 (pSTAT‐5) selectively in peripheral and liver‐infiltrating regulatory T cells (Treg) from patients with autoimmune liver disease. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from control bloods (a, n = 3) or autoimmune liver disease patient bloods [b, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) remission, n = 5; AIH relapse, n = 4; primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), n = 3; and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), n = 3] and liver‐infiltrating lymphocytes from explanted livers of patients with autoimmune liver disease (c, n = 4) were stimulated for 10 min with IL‐2 (Proleukin) at doses in the range 0–1000 IU/ml and the expression of p(Y694) STAT‐5 determined by flow cytometry for each leucocyte population. Graphs summarize pSTAT‐5 expression, quoted as percentage of positive cells or median fluorescence intensity (MFI). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Demographic, laboratory, histology and treatment details of patients in the peripheral blood cohort AIH R = autoimmune hepatitis in remission; AIH F = autoimmune hepatitis in flare up/relapse; PSC = primary sclerosing cholangitis; PBC = primary biliary cholangitis; AST = aspartate transaminase; ALT = alanine transaminase; ALP = alkaline phosphatase BR = bilirubin; Na+ = sodium; CR = creatinine; UKELD = United Kingdom End Stage Liver Disease Scoring; UDCA = ursodeoxycholic acid; n.a. = not available.

Very low doses of Proleukin induce selective phosphorylation of STAT‐5 in intrahepatic and peripheral blood Treg of patients with autoimmune liver diseases

PBMC from AIH, PBC and PSC patients were treated with Proleukin in the range of 0–100 IU/ml. Similar to controls, Treg of AIH patients [both remission and flare‐up (relapse)], PBC patients and PSC patients demonstrated a selective pSTAT‐5 induction at doses below 10 IU/ml, especially at 5 IU/ml (Fig. 1b and Supporting information, Fig. 2). We then treated human LIL isolated from explanted autoimmune liver disease tissues with 0–100 IU/ml Proleukin, and again selective pSTAT‐5 enhanced induction was seen in Treg at doses below 10 IU/ml (Fig. 1c). Descriptions of all AILD blood and liver explant donors whose PBMC and LIL were used in these and subsequent studies in this paper to address the effect of IL‐2 on phenotype are given in Tables 1 and 2 [blood donors were: AIH = 20 (aged 44·4 ± 13·8 years, disease in remission = 14, disease in flare up/relapse = 6); PSC = 3 (aged 58·0 ± 17·3 years); PBC = 10 (aged 54·0 ± 9·6 years); control = 9 (aged 55·1 ± 11·9 years)]. Liver donors were: PBC = 5 (aged 59·4 ± 6·4 years); PSC = 2 (aged 51·5 ± 23·3 years); AIH overlap = 2 (aged 38·0 ± 24·0 years), PBC/AIH overlap = 1; and PSC/AIH overlap = 1).
Table 2

Demographic, histology and treatment details of patients in the liver explant cohort

DiseaseAge (years)SexExplant historyTreatment before transplantation
PBC51MModerate fibrosisUrsodeoxycholic acid
PBC63FEstablished cirrhosisUrsodeoxycholic acid
PBC65FEstablished cirrhosisUrsodeoxycholic acid
PBC64FEstablished cirrhosisUrsodeoxycholic acid
PBC54FEstablished cirrhosisUrsodeoxycholic acid
PSC68MEstablished cirrhosis
PSC35MEstablished cirrhosis
PBC/AIH overlap55FEstablished cirrhosisUrsodeoxycholic acid
PSC/AIH overlap21FEstablished cirrhosis

AIH = autoimmune hepatitis; PBC = primary biliary cholangitis; PSC = primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Demographic, histology and treatment details of patients in the liver explant cohort AIH = autoimmune hepatitis; PBC = primary biliary cholangitis; PSC = primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Very low doses of Proleukin induce Treg functional markers CTLA‐4, CD25 and FoxP3 selectively in both blood and intrahepatic Treg

Having found 5 IU/ml Proleukin by dose titration to be the optimal concentration to induce a selective STAT‐5 response in blood and liver Treg of AILD patients, we determined the effect of 5 IU/ml Proleukin on T cell phenotype and function. PBMC and LIL from AILD patients were exposed to 0 IU/ml or 5 IU/ml Proleukin for 18 h and effects on markers of T cell activation and Treg function by T cell subsets were assessed; 5 IU/ml Proleukin increased significantly the levels of CD25, CTLA‐4 and FoxP3 on peripheral blood Treg of AILD patients (Fig. 2a and Supporting information, Fig. 3). In liver, basal expressions of CTLA‐4, CD25 and FoxP3 on Treg were higher than in blood and similar to those observed in blood following Proleukin exposure (Fig. 2a). There were clear trends towards increased expression of the Treg markers CD25 and FoxP3 with VLDP in liver Treg from PBC, PSC and AIH, supporting potentiation of Treg in the liver in settings of the AILDs (Fig. 2a and Supporting information, Fig. 3). These observations are consistent with and also reflective of upstream pSTAT‐5 induction by VLDP in liver Treg (Fig. 1c). Frequencies of expression of CD25, CTLA‐4 and FoxP3 were largely not altered in blood or liver Treg by VLDP (Supporting information, Fig. 4).
Figure 2

Effect of very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 on expression of IL‐2‐regulated regulatory T cells (Treg) functional markers CD25, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4) and forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3) by Treg cells from blood and liver. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 5), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), (n = 3) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), n = 6) and liver‐infiltrating leucocytes from autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) livers were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 18 h and the median fluorescence intensity of CD25, CTLA‐4 and FoxP3 examined by flow cytometry for (a) CD4, CD8 and Treg cells and (b) CD4 subsets defined by CD25 versus CD127 expression. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significant effects of IL‐2 analysed by paired t‐tests (a) and two‐way analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni's post‐hoc test (b) are shown.

Effect of very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 on expression of IL‐2‐regulated regulatory T cells (Treg) functional markers CD25, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4) and forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3) by Treg cells from blood and liver. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 5), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), (n = 3) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), n = 6) and liver‐infiltrating leucocytes from autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) livers were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 18 h and the median fluorescence intensity of CD25, CTLA‐4 and FoxP3 examined by flow cytometry for (a) CD4, CD8 and Treg cells and (b) CD4 subsets defined by CD25 versus CD127 expression. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significant effects of IL‐2 analysed by paired t‐tests (a) and two‐way analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni's post‐hoc test (b) are shown. Because we noticed that 18 h exposure to Proleukin led to STAT‐5 phosphorylation in CD25+CD127+CD4+ T cells that mirrored that in Treg (CD25+CD127CD4+) (both frequency and MFI) (Supporting information, Fig. 5), we evaluated the effect of 18‐h VLDP on the expression of CD25, CTLA‐4 and FoxP3 by the CD25+CD127+CD4+ T effector cell population in the blood of AILD patients (Fig. 2b). Importantly, despite phosphorylation of STAT‐5, this subset, unlike Treg, did not up‐regulate CD25, CTLA4 or FoxP3 (Fig. 2b). We then investigated the effect of VLDP on the expression by peripheral and liver‐infiltrating Treg of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily members CD137, OX40 and GITR. Culture in 5 IU/ml Proleukin helped to maintain expression frequencies of CD137 and GITR on peripheral Treg over 18 h and promoted an increase in the frequency of OX40 expressing peripheral Treg (Fig. 3a and Supporting information, Fig. 3). Exposure to VLDP did not influence the frequency of expression of these markers on liver‐infiltrating Treg (Fig. 3a). We also investigated the impact of VLDP on Treg‐associated surface markers, including CD39, CD73 and LAG3. Proleukin 5 IU/ml had no effect on the expression frequency of any of these molecules (Fig. 3b and Supporting information, Fig. 3): high expression of CD39 was maintained, CD73 remained low‐expressed and TIM3 and LAG3, which were not detected at baseline, were not induced by Proleukin treatment on Treg. Also, VLDP did not alter expression of the activation marker, CD69 or the immune checkpoint and programmed cell death receptor‐1 (PD‐1) on CD4+ or CD8+ T cells or Treg (Fig. 3c and Supporting information, Fig. 3). Consistent with a lack of pSTAT‐5 induction in CD8+ T cells under VLDP, 5 IU/ml Proleukin did not affect expression of granzyme B or activation marker 2B4 by CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3c and Supporting information, Fig. 3).
Figure 3

(a–c) Effect of very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 on regulatory T cells (Treg) and T effector functional and activation phenotypes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and liver infiltrating leucocytes from autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) livers were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 18 h and the expression of functional and activation markers by T cell subsets analysed by flow cytometry. (a) Expression of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily members by blood and liver Treg. (b) Expression of CD39, CD73, T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain‐containing‐3 (TIM3) and lymphocyte‐activation gene 3 (LAG3) by blood Treg. (C) Expression of CD69, programed death 1 (PD‐1), 2B4 and granzyme B by blood CD4, CD8 and Treg. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) for 2–6 donors. (d–f) Very low dose IL‐2 increases Treg suppressive ability in a mechanism involving cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4). CD4+CD25+CD127– Treg and autologous CD4+CD25– T responder cells were isolated from PBMC of control individuals. T responders were labelled with cell trace violet and following overnight exposure of Treg to 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin were co‐cultured with the Treg in the presence of anti‐CD3 and dendritic cells, with or without CTLA‐4 blockade. Cell trace violet dilution indicating T responder cell division was analysed by flow cytometry at 5 days. (d) Representative flow cytometry histograms of T responder division showing percentage division. (e) Division index summary data (n = 3) of T responders in the presence of Treg pretreated with 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin. (f) Division index summary data (n = 3) of T responders in the presence of Treg pretreated with 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin with or without anti‐CTLA‐4. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significant effects of IL‐2 and CTLA‐4 blockade analysed by paired t‐tests (e) and one‐way analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni post‐hoc test (f) are shown.

(a–c) Effect of very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 on regulatory T cells (Treg) and T effector functional and activation phenotypes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and liver infiltrating leucocytes from autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) livers were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 18 h and the expression of functional and activation markers by T cell subsets analysed by flow cytometry. (a) Expression of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily members by blood and liver Treg. (b) Expression of CD39, CD73, T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain‐containing‐3 (TIM3) and lymphocyte‐activation gene 3 (LAG3) by blood Treg. (C) Expression of CD69, programed death 1 (PD‐1), 2B4 and granzyme B by blood CD4, CD8 and Treg. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) for 2–6 donors. (d–f) Very low dose IL‐2 increases Treg suppressive ability in a mechanism involving cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4). CD4+CD25+CD127Treg and autologous CD4+CD25– T responder cells were isolated from PBMC of control individuals. T responders were labelled with cell trace violet and following overnight exposure of Treg to 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin were co‐cultured with the Treg in the presence of anti‐CD3 and dendritic cells, with or without CTLA‐4 blockade. Cell trace violet dilution indicating T responder cell division was analysed by flow cytometry at 5 days. (d) Representative flow cytometry histograms of T responder division showing percentage division. (e) Division index summary data (n = 3) of T responders in the presence of Treg pretreated with 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin. (f) Division index summary data (n = 3) of T responders in the presence of Treg pretreated with 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin with or without anti‐CTLA‐4. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significant effects of IL‐2 and CTLA‐4 blockade analysed by paired t‐tests (e) and one‐way analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni post‐hoc test (f) are shown.

Very low dose Proleukin enhances Treg suppressive potential in a CTLA‐4‐dependent manner across all autoimmune liver diseases

Having established that VLDP 5 IU/ml enhances Treg expression of regulatory functional molecules we sought to verify that these changes in phenotype associate with improvements in Treg function. We tested whether exposure to VLDP could increase the ability of Treg to suppress the division of autologous CD25CD4+ T effector cells. We used a system of anti‐CD3 together with monocyte‐derived DC to supply co‐stimulatory ligands. This system was chosen over conventional anti‐CD3/CD28 bead activation of T cell proliferation in order that the functional impact of antigen‐presenting cell–Treg contact‐dependent mechanisms of suppression such as involving CTLA‐4 might be studied. Pre‐treatment of Treg with Proleukin reduced significantly the division of T responder cells from control individuals cultured 2·5 : 1 with autologous Treg (Fig. 3d,e). This elevated suppressive potential of VLDP‐treated Treg was overcome in the presence of anti‐CTLA‐4 (Fig. 3d,f). Consistent with our observations that CTLA‐4‐Ig can reduce T responder division (Supporting information, Fig. 6a), anti‐CTLA‐4 also tended to increase T responder division in the presence of untreated Treg (Fig. 3f). We observed the same trends of improved Treg function involving contribution from CTLA‐4 with VLDP treatment of Treg in both cases of AILD patients tested (Supporting information, Fig. 6b).

Very low dose Proleukin treatment does not alter liver homing CXCR3 expression by peripheral blood Treg in autoimmune liver diseases

Regulatory T cell homing to the site of liver inflammation is crucial for the success of Treg therapies, thus we examined the crucial liver‐homing chemokine receptor, CXCR3, on blood Treg of autoimmune liver disease patients. De‐novo expression levels (MFI and frequency) of CXCR3 were similar in patients with AIH compared to controls (Fig. 4a). Importantly, VLDP 5 IU/ml did not have any impact upon CXCR3 expression in AIH patients over 18 h or up to 3 days (Fig. 4b,c). Peripheral Treg from PSC and PBC patients also showed no change in their CXCR3 expression with sustained culture in VLDP (Fig. 4b,d), thus VLDP therapy may be applicable for all three autoimmune liver diseases without impairing the recruitment capacity of Treg.
Figure 4

Very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 does not down‐regulate liver‐homing CXCR3 receptor on regulatory T cells (Treg). (a) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from controls and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients and Treg phenotyped for CXCR3 by flow cytometry ex vivo. (b,c) CXCR3 expression was measured in PBMC Treg from patients with AIH, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) ex vivo and after culture for 18 h and/or 3 days in 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin). Expression of CXCR3 by CD4+CD25+CD127– Treg of one representative donor from each disease cohort is shown in (b) and expression summarized for AIH, PSC donors and PBC donors in (c). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).

Very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 does not down‐regulate liver‐homing CXCR3 receptor on regulatory T cells (Treg). (a) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from controls and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients and Treg phenotyped for CXCR3 by flow cytometry ex vivo. (b,c) CXCR3 expression was measured in PBMC Treg from patients with AIH, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) ex vivo and after culture for 18 h and/or 3 days in 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin). Expression of CXCR3 by CD4+CD25+CD127Treg of one representative donor from each disease cohort is shown in (b) and expression summarized for AIH, PSC donors and PBC donors in (c). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).

Very low dose Proleukin treatment increases total Treg frequencies and promotes the strongest Treg suppressive phenotype in the CD45RA–CCR7– population of Treg

We noted that the CD25+CD127FoxP3+ Treg population, as a proportion of total CD4+ T cells, increased significantly with culture in VLDP up to 3 days in AILD patients and controls (Fig. 5a). No differences in frequency were seen between any of the patient or control groups at either condition. The naive (CD45RA+CCR7+) subset of Treg has been reported to maintain the Treg‐specific demethylated region (TSDR) following expansion, making them an attractive option for Treg cell immunotherapy 26, 27; thus, we evaluated the effect of 3 days VLDP on frequencies of each of the maturation subsets of CD25+CD127FoxP3+ Treg defined by CD45RA and CCR7 expression 28. VLDP did not alter the proportions of the maturation subsets in any AILD patient cohorts (AIH, PSC, PBC) or controls (Fig. 5b,c). None the less, as before, VLDP increased significantly the expression of IL‐2 regulated markers CTLA‐4, CD25 and FoxP3 on Treg from all subsets. Overall, across AIH, PSC, PBC and control, the effector memory (CD45RA–CCR7–) subset of CD25+CD127FoxP3+ Treg cells showed the greatest induction of Treg functional markers with VLDP treatment (Fig. 5d).
Figure 5

Low dose Proleukin treatment increases total regulatory T cell (Treg) frequencies and promotes the strongest Treg phenotype in the CD45Ra–CCR7– effector memory population of Treg. (a) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from controls, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 3 days and the frequency of CD4+CD25+CD127–forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ Treg assessed by flow cytometry. Significant effects of IL‐2 were analysed by two‐way analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni's post‐hoc analysis. Frequencies of memory and naive subsets of CD4+CD25+CD127–FoxP3+ Treg as defined by CD45Ra and CCR7 expression were also determined at 3 days by flow cytometry. (b) Representative flow cytometry density plot of CCR7 versus CD45Ra for one PSC donor after 3 days of culture in 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin and summary data for all donors (c). Significant effects of IL‐2 on the frequencies of the different memory/naive subsets were compared by two‐way anova with Bonferroni's post‐hoc analysis, but no significant differences were identified. (D) Expression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4), CD25 and FoxP3 by each memory or naive subset of Treg. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) (control (n = 3), AIH (n = 4), PSC (n = 3) and PBC (n = 6), central memory (CM) (CD45Ra–CCR7+); naive (CD45Ra+CCR7+); terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA) (CD45Ra+CCR7–); effector memory (EM) (CD45Ra–CCR7–). Effects of 5 IU/ml Proleukin on the expression of these markers by each subset were analysed by two‐way anova with Bonferroni's post‐hoc tests. Stars indicate where there was a significant effect of IL‐2 upon the expression of the marker by the subset (*P < 0·05; **P < 0·01; ***P < 0·001; ****P < 0·0001). Braces with stated P‐values indicate significant differences in expression by the subsets under 5 IU/ml Proleukin conditions. With the exception of CTLA‐4 expression by naive versus EM cells in PSC patients, or of FoxP3 expression by CN versus naive, CM versus TEMRA or TEMRA versus effector memory in PBC patients, there were no significant differences between the subsets for expression of any marker in the absence of IL‐2 treatment.

Low dose Proleukin treatment increases total regulatory T cell (Treg) frequencies and promotes the strongest Treg phenotype in the CD45Ra–CCR7– effector memory population of Treg. (a) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from controls, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 3 days and the frequency of CD4+CD25+CD127–forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ Treg assessed by flow cytometry. Significant effects of IL‐2 were analysed by two‐way analysis of variance (anova) with Bonferroni's post‐hoc analysis. Frequencies of memory and naive subsets of CD4+CD25+CD127FoxP3+ Treg as defined by CD45Ra and CCR7 expression were also determined at 3 days by flow cytometry. (b) Representative flow cytometry density plot of CCR7 versus CD45Ra for one PSC donor after 3 days of culture in 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin and summary data for all donors (c). Significant effects of IL‐2 on the frequencies of the different memory/naive subsets were compared by two‐way anova with Bonferroni's post‐hoc analysis, but no significant differences were identified. (D) Expression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4), CD25 and FoxP3 by each memory or naive subset of Treg. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) (control (n = 3), AIH (n = 4), PSC (n = 3) and PBC (n = 6), central memory (CM) (CD45Ra–CCR7+); naive (CD45Ra+CCR7+); terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA) (CD45Ra+CCR7–); effector memory (EM) (CD45Ra–CCR7–). Effects of 5 IU/ml Proleukin on the expression of these markers by each subset were analysed by two‐way anova with Bonferroni's post‐hoc tests. Stars indicate where there was a significant effect of IL‐2 upon the expression of the marker by the subset (*P < 0·05; **P < 0·01; ***P < 0·001; ****P < 0·0001). Braces with stated P‐values indicate significant differences in expression by the subsets under 5 IU/ml Proleukin conditions. With the exception of CTLA‐4 expression by naive versus EM cells in PSC patients, or of FoxP3 expression by CN versus naive, CM versus TEMRA or TEMRA versus effector memory in PBC patients, there were no significant differences between the subsets for expression of any marker in the absence of IL‐2 treatment.

Liver‐infiltrated Treg are restricted predominantly to the CD45RA–CCR7– population

Blood CD25+CD127FoxP3+ Treg subsets in AILD patients are comprised of approximately 60% effector memory (CD45RA–CCR7–), 15–20% central memory (CD45RA–CCR7+) and 15–20% naive (CD45RA+CCR7+) populations. Because VLDP increased significantly the expression of Treg functional markers CTLA‐4, CD25 and FoxP3, especially in the CD45RA–CCR7– subset of Treg, we investigated the frequency of these subsets in the inflamed human liver. We found that the effector memory CD45RA–CCR7– subset of CD25+CD127FoxP3+ Treg population is increased significantly (95%) in the inflamed human livers compared to peripheral blood (60%) (Fig. 6a,b).
Figure 6

Comparison of the frequencies of memory and naive regulatory T cell (Treg) populations in blood and liver. (a) Frequencies of memory and naive subsets of CD4+CD25+CD127– Treg as defined by CD45Ra and CCR7 expression were determined by flow cytometry for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and liver infiltrating lymphocytes from patients with autoimmune liver diseases (AILD). (a) Representative flow cytometry density plot for expression of CD45Ra and CCR7 by blood and liver infiltrating Treg showing the four subsets including: central memory (CM) (CD45Ra–CCR7+); naive (CD45Ra+CCR7+); terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA) (CD45Ra+CCR7–); effector memory (EM) (CD45Ra–CCR7–). (b) Summary frequencies for each memory and naive subset in blood [n = 6 donors with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)] and liver [n = 4 donors with AILDs including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC)]. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significance was tested by non‐matched two‐way analysis of variance (anova) and showed significant interaction for subset versus tissue P < 0·0001. Bonferroni's post‐hoc tests identified significant differences between blood and liver in the frequencies of CM and EM cells, as indicated. There was no significant effect of tissue on subset distribution but there was a significant effect of subset P < 0·0001.

Comparison of the frequencies of memory and naive regulatory T cell (Treg) populations in blood and liver. (a) Frequencies of memory and naive subsets of CD4+CD25+CD127Treg as defined by CD45Ra and CCR7 expression were determined by flow cytometry for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and liver infiltrating lymphocytes from patients with autoimmune liver diseases (AILD). (a) Representative flow cytometry density plot for expression of CD45Ra and CCR7 by blood and liver infiltrating Treg showing the four subsets including: central memory (CM) (CD45Ra–CCR7+); naive (CD45Ra+CCR7+); terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA) (CD45Ra+CCR7–); effector memory (EM) (CD45Ra–CCR7–). (b) Summary frequencies for each memory and naive subset in blood [n = 6 donors with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)] and liver [n = 4 donors with AILDs including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC)]. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significance was tested by non‐matched two‐way analysis of variance (anova) and showed significant interaction for subset versus tissue P < 0·0001. Bonferroni's post‐hoc tests identified significant differences between blood and liver in the frequencies of CM and EM cells, as indicated. There was no significant effect of tissue on subset distribution but there was a significant effect of subset P < 0·0001.

Very low dose Proleukin up‐regulates expression of the anti‐apoptotic molecule Bcl‐2 on Treg compared to effector T cells

The anti‐apoptotic protein Bcl‐2 is regulated differentially in effector T cells versus Treg 29. To assess whether VLDP alters Bcl‐2 expression, lymphocytes from AILD patients and controls were treated with 5 IU/ml Proleukin for 18 h or 3 days and their Bcl‐2 expression was evaluated. While expression by total CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was not altered up to 3 days, VLDP tended to increase blood Treg expression of Bcl‐2 by 18 h (Fig. 7a). By 3 days, a significant twofold up‐regulation of Bcl‐2 expression in Treg of patients with AIH was seen (Fig. 7b), and the same trend was observed in PSC and PBC (Fig. 7c). We also verified the effect of VLDP on Bcl‐2 in AILD liver Treg at 3 days. Consistent with the response found in blood, we observed selective up‐regulation of Bcl‐2 in liver Treg (Fig. 7d), which were of PBC and PSC disease backgrounds. In view of the STAT‐5 response by the CD4+CD25+CD127+ subset with sustained exposure to VLDP, we analysed the effect of VLDP on Bcl‐2 expression by each CD4+ T cell subset, defined by CD25 versus CD127 expression at 3 days in blood (Fig. 7e,f) and liver (Fig. 7g), and saw that in blood the CD4+CD25+CD127+ subset also showed increased Bcl‐2 expression with Proleukin; however, the relative fold increase in Bcl‐2 expression by this effector subset was less compared to that observed for Treg.
Figure 7

Very low dose interleukin (IL)‐2 up‐regulates Bcl‐2 expression in regulatory T cells (Treg) from blood and liver. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients (a,b,e), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients (c,f), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients (c,f) and liver‐infiltrating lymphocytes from autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) livers (d,g) were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 18 h (a) or 3 days (b–g) and the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Bcl‐2 on CD4, CD8 and Treg examined by flow cytometry (a–d). (E–G) Day 3 Bcl‐2 expression by blood (e,f) and liver (g) CD4+ T cell subsets defined by CD25 versus CD127 expression. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significant effects of IL‐2 were assessed by paired t‐tests (a–d) and two‐way analysis of variance (anova) (e–g).

Very low dose interleukin (IL)‐2 up‐regulates Bcl‐2 expression in regulatory T cells (Treg) from blood and liver. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients (a,b,e), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients (c,f), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients (c,f) and liver‐infiltrating lymphocytes from autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) livers (d,g) were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 18 h (a) or 3 days (b–g) and the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Bcl‐2 on CD4, CD8 and Treg examined by flow cytometry (a–d). (E–G) Day 3 Bcl‐2 expression by blood (e,f) and liver (g) CD4+ T cell subsets defined by CD25 versus CD127 expression. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Significant effects of IL‐2 were assessed by paired t‐tests (a–d) and two‐way analysis of variance (anova) (e–g).

Discussion

IL‐2 is a crucial cytokine for survival and function of T cells, including Treg. We demonstrated in this study that very low dose clinical grade IL‐2 (Proleukin) induces STAT‐5 phosphorylation selectively in CD4+CD25+CD127Treg from blood and liver of patients with AILD and is accompanied not only by a series of phenotypic and functional changes, but also up‐regulates Bcl‐2 to support Treg survival. These data support existing evidence in autoimmune conditions such as diabetes and vasculitis that VLDIL‐2 administration contributes to the maintenance of self‐tolerance by increasing Treg frequency 23, 25, 30. Our study extends the potential of VLDP therapy to the treatment of autoimmune liver diseases. Administration of the IL‐2 or the IL‐2 : anti‐IL‐2 monoclonal antibody complex reduces autoimmune disease in rodent models 31, 32. Studies in vasculitis, graft‐versus‐host disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and type 1 diabetes suggest that an IL‐2 dose range of 0·3–3·0 × 106 IU/m2 is well tolerated, and achieves a preferential increase in the percentage of Treg with no induction of effector T cell activation 23, 25, 33, 34. The dose range we have identified working with clinical grade IL‐2 (Proleukin) in vitro is similar to other investigators, who have applied VLDP in autoimmune diseases 11, 23, 25, 34. High‐dose IL‐2 is approved in cancer therapy, where it promotes tumour killing by activating NK cells and CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells 12; however, pulmonary vascular leakage occurs as a side effect to this treatment 35. By avoiding the activation of effector cells, VLDP should be safe for clinical application in general. Indeed, a former dose escalation study of low‐dose IL‐2 for treatment of graft‐versus‐host disease reported very few adverse events except skin induration in a minority of study patients. Other potentially linked rare side effects include fatigue, malaise, fever, thrombocytopenia and raised serum creatinine 23. Despite this, it is prudent that low‐dose Proleukin therapy in a hospital setting be restricted to patients with normal cardiac and pulmonary function. IL‐2 is crucial for Treg function. Binding of IL‐2 to IL‐2RA (CD25) on Treg leads to phosphorylation of STAT‐5, resulting in up‐regulation of FoxP3 36 and functional surface markers. FoxP3 is essential for Treg development and function, as evident from the occurrence of immunodysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X‐linked (IPEX) syndrome in patients with mutations in FoxP3 37, 38. Although Treg do not secrete IL‐2, their high expression of CD25 allows them to consume and respond to low concentrations of exogenous IL‐2 39, 40. CD4+CD25CD127+ effector T cells express intermediate‐affinity IL‐2 receptors, IL‐2RB and IL‐2RG constitutively; thus, they require higher concentrations of IL‐2 for activation in the absence of T cell receptor (TCR) engagement 41. Importantly, we observed that applying VLDP of less than 5 IU/ml could enhance FoxP3 selectively in Treg compared to CD8+, CD4+CD25CD127+/– and CD4+CD25+CD127+ effector T cells from the blood and liver of patients with AILD. There was no noticeable activation of these effector subsets based on expression of CD69, granzyme B or 2B4. CTLA‐4 is an essential functional marker on Treg 42. It functions by removing its co‐stimulatory ligands, CD80/CD86, from antigen‐presenting cells by transendocytosis 43. Mice deficient in CTLA‐4 display an autoimmune phenotype and immune dysregulation is observed in patients with CTLA‐4 polymorphisms 44. Our data suggest that VLDP up‐regulates CTLA‐4 expression by Treg, but has no impact on CD4+CD25+CD127+ effector T cells. Furthermore, we identify that CTLA‐4 is a significant mediator in the mechanisms by which VLDP confers enhanced suppressive potential to Treg; VLDP also maintains Treg functional markers such as GITR and OX40. We have reported recently that the inflamed liver microenvironment is deficient in IL‐2 protein and that activated intrahepatic T cells are the main source of IL‐2 in the human liver 4. Local consumption of IL‐2 by immune cells, including Treg, creates a microenvironment that is deficient in IL‐2 to the level that it is unable to support Treg function. This finding is consistent with our previous observation that only some of the FoxP3+ Treg in the liver undergo STAT‐5 phosphorylation 45. We observed that liver Treg had higher baseline expressions of CTLA‐4, CD25 and FoxP3 than peripheral Treg and these were equivalent to levels seen on peripheral blood Treg after IL‐2 stimulation. A higher baseline expression probably reflects the more activated, effector state of liver versus blood lymphocytes. Liver Treg also expressed higher levels of the TNF receptor superfamily members CD137, OX40 and GITR than peripheral Treg, and comparing our current data in peripheral blood with our previous phenotyping of intrahepatic Treg in AILD we identify that CD69 (40%), LAG3 (20%), Tim3 (5%) and cytolytic granzyme B (5%) are also all up‐regulated on Treg in the liver compared to periphery (< 5% in peripheral blood) 4. This is in contrast to CD39 and PD‐1, which are expressed similarly on Treg at both sites 4. The effectiveness of Treg function within the inflamed tissue setting might be compromised due to the action of inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐12, IFN‐γ and IL‐1βγ 4, which can enhance effector T cell activation and proliferation at the expense of Treg. Thus, exogenous IL‐2 such as VLDP might help to counteract these inflammatory signals 46, 47. CTLA‐4‐mediated Treg suppressive function is via depletion of CD80/86 through transendocytosis 43. Excitingly, we observed that VLDP enhances Treg suppressive function via CTLA‐4. Recruitment of peripheral blood Treg to the site of hepatic inflammation is dependent upon expression of the tissue‐homing CXCR3 chemokine receptor 45, 48, 49. We found expression of CXCR3 on approximately 50% of peripheral blood Treg from AILD patients, comparable to controls, suggesting that cells from patients, even on immunosuppression, retain the liver‐homing receptors for recruitment. Moreover, we report that CXCR3 expression was unaffected by VLDP, implying that Treg of patients on VLDP therapy would retain the capability to home to inflamed hepatic lobules and portal tracts. We have reported recently that human liver‐infiltrating Treg are mainly of CD45RA–CCR7– phenotype 4. Our findings now demonstrate that exogenous VLDIL‐2 up‐regulates Treg functional markers predominantly in this effector (suppressor) population in all types of AILD. A recent study also described high expression of CXCR3 in CD4+ T cells in early‐stage PBC, which was associated with increased demethylation of the CXCR3 promoter. This up‐regulation was most striking in the activated memory CD45RO+ population 50. Taken together, these data suggest that CD4+ Treg from patients with AILD will recruit to the human liver and be potentiated functionally by IL‐2 therapy. Treg depend upon IL‐2 for expansion and survival and cells undergo apoptosis upon IL‐2 deprivation 51. Bcl‐2 is a critical target in IL‐2 signalling 18, 52, helping to protect responding cells from apoptosis. A recent study also confirmed that use of a pan‐Bcl‐2 inhibitor leads to profound down‐regulation of FoxP3 and CTLA‐4 and a reduction in the suppressive function of Treg 53. We demonstrated that VLDP enhances Bcl‐2 expression selectively in Treg but not CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T effector cells from both peripheral blood and liver. This is an important observation because enhanced survival of immune‐regulatory Treg is critical to the maintenance of tolerance. In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence to support the design of Treg‐directed Phase I and II clinical trials administering VLDP as a cytokine monotherapy or in combination with autologous Treg cell therapy in AILD. Given its short half‐life, regular doses of VLDP may be required to maintain efficacy.

Author contributions

Y. H. O. and H. C. J. designed the experiments. H. C. J. L. E. J. and P. L. performed the experiments, analysed the data and prepared the figures. H. C. J., L. E. J., P. L., D. H. A. and Y. H. O. wrote the manuscript. G. W., M. C. and G. H. consented patients and collected clinical data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Disclosure

Y. H. O and H. C. J. are funded by Clinician Scientist Award from the Medical Research Council, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Charity and National Institute for Health Research Liver Biomedical Research Unit, Birmingham. All authors declare that there are no financial conflicts of interest associated with this work. This paper presents independent research supported by the Birmingham NIHR Liver Biomedical Research Unit based at the University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's website. Fig. S1. Flow cytometry gating strategy for the analysis of signal transducer and activator of transcription‐5 (STAT‐5) expression by regulatory T cells (Treg) and eight other immune cell subsets. Fig. S2. Very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 selectively up‐regulates signal transducer and activator of transcription‐5 (STAT‐5) in peripheral regulatory T cells (Treg) from autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patient bloods. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with AIH, PBC or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) were stimulated for 10 min with IL‐2 (Proleukin) 0‐100 IU/ml and the percentage expression of phosphorylated (Y694)STAT5 by each leucocyte population assessed by flow cytometry at each IL‐2 dose. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) for five donors (AIH remission), four donors (AIH relapse) and three donors (PBC and PSC). Fig. S3. Flow cytometry gating strategy (a) to define CD4, CD8 and regulatory T cell (Treg) populations and representative overlays (b,d) for markers of T cell activation and function on CD4, CD8 and Treg in autoimmune liver disease (AILD) blood [autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)] and liver [primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)] following 18 h exposure to Proleukin 5 IU/ml. Fig. S4. Effect of very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 on expression of IL‐2‐regulated regulatory T cell (Treg) functional markers CD25, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4) and forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3+) by CD4, CD8 and Treg cells from blood and liver. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and liver infiltrating lymphocytes from autoimmune liver disease (AILD) livers were exposed to 0 or 5 IU/ml IL‐2 (Proleukin) for 18 h and the percentage expression of CD25, CTLA‐4 and FoxP3 by CD4+, CD8+ and Treg cells examined by flow cytometry. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.)for five donors (AIH), three donors (PSC) and five donors (liver). Fig. S5. Sustained exposure to low dose interleukin (IL)−2 up‐regulates signal transducer and activator of transcription‐5 (STAT‐5) selectively in CD4+CD25+CD127+ T cells as well as in regulatory T cells (Treg). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with autoimmune liver disease (AILD) were stimulated for 18 h with IL‐2 (Proleukin) doses of 0, 1, 5 and 10 IU/ml and expression of phosphorylated (Y694)STAT‐5 by each leucocyte population assessed by flow cytometry. (a) Percentage of each leucocyte population expressing pSTAT‐5 at each IL‐2 dose. (b) median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for pSTAT‐5. Fig. S6. Effect of very low dose interleukin (IL)−2 on the suppressive ability of regulatory T cells (Treg) in autoimmune liver diseases. (a) CD4+CD25– T responder cells were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of controls (n = 3) and the effect of blocking CD28‐mediated co‐stimulation with Abatacept [cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen‐4‐immunoglobulin (CTLA‐4‐Ig)] on division index at 5 days examined. (B) CD4+CD25+CD127Treg and autologous CD4+CD25– T responder cells were isolated from PBMC of two patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (one in remission and one in relapse). T responders were labelled with cell trace violet, and following overnight exposure of Treg to 0 or 5 IU/ml Proleukin were co‐cultured with the Treg in the presence of anti‐CD3 and dendritic cells, with or without CTLA‐4 blockade. Cell trace violet dilution indicating T responder cell division was analysed by flow cytometry at 5 days. Click here for additional data file.
  53 in total

1.  Functional study of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in health and autoimmune hepatitis.

Authors:  Maria Serena Longhi; Munther J Hussain; Ragai R Mitry; Sunil K Arora; Giorgina Mieli-Vergani; Diego Vergani; Yun Ma
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Low-dose interleukin-2 fosters a dose-dependent regulatory T cell tuned milieu in T1D patients.

Authors:  Michelle Rosenzwajg; Guillaume Churlaud; Roberto Mallone; Adrien Six; Nicolas Dérian; Wahiba Chaara; Roberta Lorenzon; S Alice Long; Jane H Buckner; Georgia Afonso; Hang-Phuong Pham; Agnès Hartemann; Aixin Yu; Alberto Pugliese; Thomas R Malek; David Klatzmann
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 7.094

3.  The IL-2 receptor promotes lymphocyte proliferation and induction of the c-myc, bcl-2, and bcl-x genes through the trans-activation domain of Stat5.

Authors:  J D Lord; B C McIntosh; P D Greenberg; B H Nelson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Jason D Fontenot; Marc A Gavin; Alexander Y Rudensky
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-03-03       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Competing feedback loops shape IL-2 signaling between helper and regulatory T lymphocytes in cellular microenvironments.

Authors:  Dorothea Busse; Maurus de la Rosa; Kirstin Hobiger; Kevin Thurley; Michael Flossdorf; Alexander Scheffold; Thomas Höfer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Liver-targeted and peripheral blood alterations of regulatory T cells in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Ruth Y Lan; Chunmei Cheng; Zhe-Xiong Lian; Koichi Tsuneyama; Guo-Xiang Yang; Yuki Moritoki; Ya-Hui Chuang; Takafumi Nakamura; Shigeru Saito; Shinji Shimoda; Atsushi Tanaka; Christopher L Bowlus; Yasuo Takano; Aftab A Ansari; Ross L Coppel; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Three distinct IL-2 signaling pathways mediated by bcl-2, c-myc, and lck cooperate in hematopoietic cell proliferation.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; Z J Liu; A Kawahara; Y Minami; K Yamada; Y Tsujimoto; E L Barsoumian; R M Permutter; T Taniguchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-04-21       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Low-dose interleukin 2 in patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase 1/2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Agnès Hartemann; Gilbert Bensimon; Christine A Payan; Sophie Jacqueminet; Olivier Bourron; Nathalie Nicolas; Michèle Fonfrede; Michelle Rosenzwajg; Claude Bernard; David Klatzmann
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 32.069

9.  Regulatory T cells and autoimmune hepatitis: what happens in the liver stays in the liver.

Authors:  Ye H Oo; David H Adams
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells.

Authors:  Weihong Liu; Amy L Putnam; Zhou Xu-Yu; Gregory L Szot; Michael R Lee; Shirley Zhu; Peter A Gottlieb; Philipp Kapranov; Thomas R Gingeras; Barbara Fazekas de St Groth; Carol Clayberger; David M Soper; Steven F Ziegler; Jeffrey A Bluestone
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Targeting regulatory T cells for immunotherapy in melanoma.

Authors:  Lili Huang; Yeye Guo; Shujing Liu; Huaishan Wang; Jinjin Zhu; Lingling Ou; Xiaowei Xu
Journal:  Mol Biomed       Date:  2021-04-19

2.  Phenotypic and Functional Studies of Human Treg Cell Subpopulations.

Authors:  Mo Atif; Mustapha Cherai; Makoto Miyara
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

3.  Inhibiting IL-2 signaling and the regulatory T-cell pathway using computationally designed peptides.

Authors:  Tammy Price-Troska; Zhi-Zhang Yang; David Diller; Alexander Bayden; Mark Jarosinski; Joseph Audie; Stephen M Ansell
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Natural Killer Cells and Regulatory T Cells Cross Talk in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Exploring Therapeutic Options for the Next Decade.

Authors:  Amber G Bozward; Frazer Warricker; Ye H Oo; Salim I Khakoo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  Regulatory T Cell Metabolism in the Hepatic Microenvironment.

Authors:  Rebecca Ellen Wawman; Helen Bartlett; Ye Htun Oo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Tregs: Where We Are and What Comes Next?

Authors:  Hai Zhao; Xuelian Liao; Yan Kang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  MKL-1 is a coactivator for STAT5b, the regulator of Treg cell development and function.

Authors:  Yuan Xiang; Jun Wang; Jia Peng Li; Wei Guo; Feng Huang; Hui Min Zhang; Han Han Li; Zhou Tong Dai; Zi Jian Zhang; Hui Li; Le Yuan Bao; Chao Jiang Gu; Kun Chen; Tong Cun Zhang; Xing Hua Liao
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 8.  CTLA‑4 interferes with the HBV‑specific T cell immune response (Review).

Authors:  Hui Cao; Ruiwen Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 9.  Immunopathobiology and therapeutic targets related to cytokines in liver diseases.

Authors:  Yong He; Seonghwan Hwang; Yeni Ait Ahmed; Dechun Feng; Na Li; Marcelle Ribeiro; Fouad Lafdil; Tatiana Kisseleva; Gyongyi Szabo; Bin Gao
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.530

10.  Changes in natural killer cells and exhausted memory regulatory T Cells with corticosteroid therapy in acute autoimmune hepatitis.

Authors:  Hannah C Jeffery; Manjit K Braitch; Chris Bagnall; James Hodson; Louisa E Jeffery; Rebecca E Wawman; Lin Lee Wong; Jane Birtwistle; Helen Bartlett; Ansgar W Lohse; Gideon M Hirschfield; Jessica Dyson; David Jones; Stefan G Hubscher; Paul Klenerman; David H Adams; Ye H Oo
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2018-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.