Literature DB >> 28176011

Implantation of a second glaucoma drainage device.

Brian A Francis1, Rodrigo A B Fernandes2, Handan Akil3, Vikas Chopra3, Bruno Diniz2, James Tan3, Alex Huang3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate success rates in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) after implantation of a second glaucoma drainage device (GDD) with a Baerveldt glaucoma implant in patients with refractory glaucoma, with a secondary aim of reducing the need for postoperative glaucoma medications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, noncomparative, interventional study included patients undergoing a second GDD for uncontrolled glaucoma from a tertiary care glaucoma service. Data were obtained from the medical records for the preoperative period and after the 1st, 15th, and 30th day, 3, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly until the last postoperative visit. Visual acuity, IOP, and number of glaucoma medications (NGM) from the follow-up visits were compared to baseline. Success and failure criteria were analyzed based on IOP level or need of glaucoma medications.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were studied, with a mean follow-up time of 25 ± 21 months. The mean preoperative IOP was 23.7 ± 8.2 mmHg, and decreased to 14.8 ± 4.0 mmHg after 1 year, 14.4 ± 3.9 mmHg after 2 years, and 16.6 ± 8.5 mmHg after 3 years. The mean preoperative NGM was 3.4 ± 1.3, and decreased to 2.0 ± 1.8 after 1 year, 2.5 ± 1.6 after 2 years, and 2.8 ± 2.0 after 3 years. Absolute success was 9% after 1 year for a postoperative IOP between 5 and 18 mmHg, and 76% for a postoperative IOP between 5 and 21 mmHg. The qualified success was 88% at the first and second years and 83% at the third year.
CONCLUSION: With up to 3 years of follow-up, a second glaucoma drainage device was successful in reducing IOP to below 21 mmHg, but not as successful below 18 mmHg. The success rate is improved with the use of glaucoma medications with up to 3 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Glaucoma implants; Outcome; Refractory glaucoma; Sequential

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28176011     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3596-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  31 in total

1.  Visual acuity measurements.

Authors:  Jack T Holladay
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Silicone Ahmed glaucoma valve with and without intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for neovascular glaucoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sergio Henrique Teixeira; Larissa Morimoto Doi; André Luiz de Freitas Silva; Karine Duarte Silva; Ângela Tavares Paes; Fabiana Shinzato Higa; Marcelo Mendonça; João Antônio Prata; Augusto Paranhos
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study: tissue matrix breakdown by apoptotic cells in capsules surrounding molteno implants.

Authors:  Anthony C B Molteno; Andrew M Thompson; Tui H Bevin; Alex G Dempster
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt study: one-year treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Panos G Christakis; Jeffrey W Kalenak; David Zurakowski; James C Tsai; Jeffrey A Kammer; Paul J Harasymowycz; Iqbal I K Ahmed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Long tube implants in the management of glaucoma.

Authors:  A C Molteno; J L Straughan; E Ancker
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1976-06-26

6.  Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Keith Barton; William J Feuer; Joyce Schiffman; Vital P Costa; David G Godfrey; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Glaucoma drainage implant surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad A Aref; Steven J Gedde; Donald L Budenz
Journal:  Dev Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-17

8.  Sequential glaucoma implants in refractory glaucoma.

Authors:  Aashish Anand; Celso Tello; Paul A Sidoti; Robert Ritch; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 9.  Glaucoma drainage implants: a critical comparison of types.

Authors:  Kenneth S Schwartz; Richard K Lee; Steven J Gedde
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Graft survival and glaucoma outcome after simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and ahmed glaucoma valve implant.

Authors:  Abdullah Al-Torbak
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  2 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes of mitomycin C-augmented excisional bleb revision with capsulectomy for failed Ahmed glaucoma valve.

Authors:  Bar Davidov; Shimon Kurtz; Ilona Mohilevtseva; Michael Waisbourd; Rony Rachmiel
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 2.  In vitro dissolution testing models of ocular implants for posterior segment drug delivery.

Authors:  Muhammad Faris Adrianto; Febri Annuryanti; Clive G Wilson; Ravi Sheshala; Raghu Raj Singh Thakur
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.