Anushka Naidoo1, Maxwell Chirehwa2, Helen McIlleron2, Kogieleum Naidoo1,3, Sabiha Essack4, Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma1, Eddy Kimba-Phongi2, John Adamson5, Katya Govender5, Nesri Padayatchi1,3, Paolo Denti2. 1. Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. 2. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 3. MRC-CAPRISA HIV-TB Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, University of KwaZulu-Natal. 4. Antimicrobial Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 5. KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV, Durban, South Africa.
Abstract
Objectives: We compared the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin during rifampicin co-treatment or when dosed alone in African patients with drug-susceptible recurrent TB. Methods: Patients in the intervention arm of the Improving Retreatment Success (IMPRESS) randomized controlled TB trial received 400 mg of moxifloxacin, with rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide in the treatment regimen. Moxifloxacin concentrations were measured in plasma during rifampicin-based TB treatment and again 4 weeks after treatment completion, when given alone as a single dose. Moxifloxacin concentration-time data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects models. Results: We included 58 patients; 42 (72.4%) were HIV co-infected and 40 (95%) of these were on efavirenz-based ART. Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics was best described using a two-compartment disposition model with first-order lagged absorption and elimination using a semi-mechanistic model describing hepatic extraction. Oral clearance (CL/F) of moxifloxacin during rifampicin-based TB treatment was 24.3 L/h for a typical patient (fat-free mass of 47 kg), resulting in an AUC of 16.5 mg·h/L. This exposure was 7.8% lower than the AUC following the single dose of moxifloxacin given alone after TB treatment completion. In HIV-co-infected patients taking efavirenz-based ART, CL/F of moxifloxacin was increased by 42.4%, resulting in a further 30% reduction in moxifloxacin AUC. Conclusions: Moxifloxacin clearance was high and plasma concentrations low in our patients overall. Moxifloxacin AUC was further decreased by co-administration of efavirenz-based ART and, to a lesser extent, rifampicin. The clinical relevance of the low moxifloxacin concentrations for TB treatment outcomes and the need for moxifloxacin dose adjustment in the presence of rifampicin and efavirenz co-treatment need further investigation.
Objectives: We compared the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin during rifampicin co-treatment or when dosed alone in African patients with drug-susceptible recurrent TB. Methods: Patients in the intervention arm of the Improving Retreatment Success (IMPRESS) randomized controlled TB trial received 400 mg of moxifloxacin, with rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide in the treatment regimen. Moxifloxacin concentrations were measured in plasma during rifampicin-based TB treatment and again 4 weeks after treatment completion, when given alone as a single dose. Moxifloxacin concentration-time data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects models. Results: We included 58 patients; 42 (72.4%) were HIV co-infected and 40 (95%) of these were on efavirenz-based ART. Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics was best described using a two-compartment disposition model with first-order lagged absorption and elimination using a semi-mechanistic model describing hepatic extraction. Oral clearance (CL/F) of moxifloxacin during rifampicin-based TB treatment was 24.3 L/h for a typical patient (fat-free mass of 47 kg), resulting in an AUC of 16.5 mg·h/L. This exposure was 7.8% lower than the AUC following the single dose of moxifloxacin given alone after TB treatment completion. In HIV-co-infected patients taking efavirenz-based ART, CL/F of moxifloxacin was increased by 42.4%, resulting in a further 30% reduction in moxifloxacin AUC. Conclusions: Moxifloxacin clearance was high and plasma concentrations low in our patients overall. Moxifloxacin AUC was further decreased by co-administration of efavirenz-based ART and, to a lesser extent, rifampicin. The clinical relevance of the low moxifloxacin concentrations for TB treatment outcomes and the need for moxifloxacin dose adjustment in the presence of rifampicin and efavirenz co-treatment need further investigation.
Authors: C Magis-Escurra; H M J Later-Nijland; J W C Alffenaar; J Broeders; D M Burger; R van Crevel; M J Boeree; A R T Donders; R van Altena; T S van der Werf; R E Aarnoutse Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Arianna D Pranger; Jos G W Kosterink; Richard van Altena; Rob E Aarnoutse; Tjip S van der Werf; Donald R A Uges; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Charles A Peloquin; David Jamil Hadad; Lucilia Pereira Dutra Molino; Moises Palaci; W Henry Boom; Reynaldo Dietze; John L Johnson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-12-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sekai Chideya; Carla A Winston; Charles A Peloquin; William Z Bradford; Philip C Hopewell; Charles D Wells; Arthur L Reingold; Thomas A Kenyon; Themba L Moeti; Jordan W Tappero Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Emily R Holzinger; Benjamin Grady; Marylyn D Ritchie; Heather J Ribaudo; Edward P Acosta; Gene D Morse; Roy M Gulick; Gregory K Robbins; David B Clifford; Eric S Daar; Paul McLaren; David W Haas Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Simone H J van den Elsen; Marieke G G Sturkenboom; Onno W Akkerman; Katerina Manika; Ioannis P Kioumis; Tjip S van der Werf; John L Johnson; Charles Peloquin; Daan J Touw; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Vanessa B Vogensen; Mathieu S Bolhuis; Marieke G G Sturkenboom; Tjip S van der Werf; Wiel C M de Lange; Richard M Anthony; Dick van Soolingen; Jan-Willem Alffenaar; Huib A M Kerstjens; Onno W Akkerman Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Maxwell T Chirehwa; Richard Court; Mariana de Kock; Lubbe Wiesner; Nihal de Vries; Joseph Harding; Tawanda Gumbo; Gary Maartens; Rob Warren; Paolo Denti; Helen McIlleron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kendra K Radtke; Anneke C Hesseling; J L Winckler; Heather R Draper; Belen P Solans; Stephanie Thee; Lubbe Wiesner; Louvina E van der Laan; Barend Fourie; James Nielsen; H Simon Schaaf; Radojka M Savic; Anthony J Garcia-Prats Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 20.999