| Literature DB >> 28175294 |
Tamsyn Derrick1,2, Athumani M Ramadhani1,2, Karim Mtengai2, Patrick Massae2, Matthew J Burton1, Martin J Holland1.
Abstract
We previously showed that conjunctival miR-147b and miR-1285 were upregulated in Gambian adults with inflammatory scarring trachoma, and miR-155 and miR-184 expression was strongly associated with conjunctival inflammation and ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection in children from Guinea-Bissau. We investigated whether the single or combined expression of miR-147b, miR-1285, miR-155 and miR-184 was able to identify individuals with increased risk of incident or progressive scarring trachoma. Conjunctival swab samples were collected from 506 children between the ages of 4 and 12 living in northern Tanzania. These 506 samples formed the baseline sample set of a 4-year longitudinal study. Chlamydia trachomatis infection was diagnosed by droplet digital PCR and expression of miR-155, miR-184, miR-1285 and miR-147b was tested by qPCR. Individuals were assessed for incidence and progression of conjunctival scarring by comparison of conjunctival photographs taken at baseline and 4 years later. miR-184 and miR-155 were strongly associated with inflammation and infection at baseline; however, no miR was associated with 4-year scarring incidence or progression. miR-184 expression was more strongly downregulated during inflammation in non-progressors relative to progressors, suggesting that a disequilibrium in the efficiency of wound healing is a significant determinant of progressive conjunctival fibrosis. © FEMS 2017.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; biomarker; fibrosis; inflammation; miRNA; trachoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28175294 PMCID: PMC5399916 DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftx016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Dis ISSN: 2049-632X Impact factor: 3.166
Multivariate linear regression results showing associations of clinical and infection status at baseline with miR expression.
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.242 | 1.19 (0.89–1.59) | 0.043 | 1.44 (1.01–2.05) | 0.027 | 1.36 (1.04–1.78) |
| 0.61 (0.47–0.80) |
|
| 0.937 | 1.01 (0.73–1.40) | 0.156 | 1.33 (0.90–1.98) |
|
|
| 0.43 (0.32–0.58) |
|
| 0.169 | 1.23 (0.92–1.65) | 0.628 | 1.09 (0.76–1.56) | 0.369 | 1.13 (0.86–1.49) | 0.252 | 1.17 (0.89–1.53) |
|
| 0.325 | 0.75 (0.43–1.32) | 0.061 | 0.52 (0.26–1.03) | 0.033 | 0.56 (0.33–0.95) | 0.425 | 0.81 (0.48−1.36) |
|
| 0.254 | 1.22 (0.86–1.74) | 0.559 | 1.13 (0.74–1.73) |
|
|
| 0.45 (0.33–0.62) |
|
|
|
| 0.583 | 0.98 (0.91–1.05) | 0.577 | 0.98 (0.93–1.04) | 0.028 | 1.06 (1.01–1.12) |
|
| 0.369 | 0.90 (0.71-1.13) | 0.902 | 1.02 (0.77–1.35) | 0.50 | 1.07 (0.87–1.34) | 0.606 | 0.95 0.76–1.17) |
OR = odds ratio; CI = 95% confidence intervals.
Unadjusted P values are shown. Correcting for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni adjustment, P values <0.0125 would be considered significant (highlighted in bold). Data from 493 individuals (13 samples excluded from the 506 baseline samples during quality control) were included in these models. miR expression was the linear-dependent variable and clinical signs, infection status, age and sex were independent variables.
Figure 1.Principle component plot of the expression of miR-184, miR-155, miR-147b and miR-1285 at baseline. Scarring progressors (1; blue) and non-progressors (0; red) are overlaid.
miR expression and clinical signs at baseline associated with 4-year scarring progression.
| Univariate models | Stepwise best fit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (CI)a |
| OR (CI)a | |
| Mild inflammation |
|
|
|
|
| Active trachoma |
|
|
|
|
| Mild scarring |
|
|
|
|
| Moderate scarring |
|
|
|
|
| Ct infection | 0.097 | 1.73 (0.89–3.27) | ||
| miR-1285 | 0.163 | 1.17 (0.94–1.45) | ||
| miR-147b | 0.076 | 1.17 (0.98–1.41) | ||
| miR-155 | 0.105 | 1.19 (0.96–1.47) | ||
| miR-184 | 0.972 | 1.00 (0.82–1.23) | 0.041 | 1.30 (1.02–1.68) |
OR = odds ratio; CI = 95% confidence intervals.
Unadjusted P values are shown. Correcting for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni adjustment, P values <0.0063 would be considered significant (highlighted in bold). Data from 338 samples were included (8 samples were excluded from the 346 individuals seen at 4 years during quality control). Scarring progression (binary) was the dependent variable. Age and sex were adjusted for in all models. The stepwise best-fit model initially included all independent variables tested in univariate analyses and removed them one by one, finally only retaining variables that best describe variation in the dependent variable.
Figure 2.miR-184 expression was more strongly downregulated during inflammation in non-progressors relative to scarring progressors. Inflammatory score 0 = no inflammation, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = active trachoma. Differences between groups were tested using Student's t-test and were adjusted using Bonferroni correction. Boxes show the interquartile range of miR expression and the bold black central line shows the median. The number of individuals in each group (n = x) is shown inside each box. Grey-filled boxes show miR expression in scarring progressors and white-filled boxes show miR expression in non-progressors. FC = fold change.