| Literature DB >> 28174578 |
Natalia Moroz1, Karen R Fritch2, Matthew J Marcec3, Diwaker Tripathi1, Andrei Smertenko4, Kiwamu Tanaka3.
Abstract
A quantitative and robust bioassay to assess plant defense response is important for studies of disease resistance and also for the early identification of disease during pre- or non-symptomatic phases. An increase in extracellular pH is known to be an early defense response in plants. In this study, we demonstrate extracellular alkalinization as a defense response in potatoes. Using potato suspension cell cultures, we observed an alkalinization response against various pathogen- and plant-derived elicitors in a dose- and time-dependent manner. We also assessed the defense response against a variety of potato pathogens, such as protists (Phytophthora infestans and Spongospora subterranea) and fungi (Verticillium dahliae and Colletotrichum coccodes). Our results show that extracellular pH increases within 30 min in proportion to the number of pathogen spores added. Consistently with the alkalinization effect, the higher transcription level of several defense-related genes and production of reactive oxygen species was observed. Our results demonstrate that the alkalinization response is an effective marker to study early stages of defense response in potatoes.Entities:
Keywords: apoplastic pH; defense response; extracellular alkalinization; potato; suspension cell culture
Year: 2017 PMID: 28174578 PMCID: PMC5258701 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Primers sequences for potato housekeeping genes (L2 and Ubq) and defense genes used in this study.
| Gene | Accession no. | 5′–3′ sequence | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | 39816659 | F: GGCGAAATGGGTCGTGTTAT | |
| R: CATTTCTCTCGCCGAAATCG | |||
| Ubq | BQ045862 | F: CTCCGTGGTGGTATGCAGAT | |
| R: CACGTTGTCAATGGTGTCG | |||
| PAL-1 | X63103 | F: TTGCACAAGTTGCATCCATT | |
| R: CACCAGCTCTTGCACTTTCA | |||
| PAL-2 | X63104 | F: GGTCACTGCCTCGGGTGAT | |
| R: CCTGCCAGTGAGCAAACCA | |||
| PR-1b | AY050221 | F: GGCATCCCGAGCACAAAAT | |
| R: CTGCACCGGAATGAATCAAGT | |||
| PR-5 | AY737317.1 | F: GGAGGCAGACGACTCGACTT | |
| R: CCATGGTTGTTCCTGGATTCA | |||
| HMG-2 | AB041031 | F: ACAAGAAGCCAGCAGCAGTT | |
| R: CCACAAGAGCAGCAACTTCA | |||
| WRKY | DMG402007388 | F: AAAATATGGTCAAAAAGTGACAAGAG | |
| R: CATGTTGGTGCAAATGAACAC |
Comparison of the alkalinization effect of various elicitors on the potato and Arabidopsis suspension cells.
| Elicitor | Elicitor concentration | ΔpH§ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potato suspension cells | ||||
| PAMPs | Flg22 | 1 μM | 0.05 ± 0.028 | 0.29 ± 0.029∗∗∗ |
| 8 μM | 0.08 ± 0.039∗ | 0.53 ± 0.031∗∗∗ | ||
| Elf26 | 1 μM | 0.08 ± 0.050 | 0.33 ± 0.240∗∗∗ | |
| 8 μM | 0.15 ± 0.046∗ | 0.64 ± 0.033∗∗∗ | ||
| Chitin 6-mer | 8 μM | 0.51 ± 0.042∗∗∗ | 0.71 ± 0.283∗∗∗ | |
| DAMPs | OGA | 10 μg/mL | 0.12 ± 0.045∗∗ | 0.17 ± 0.039∗ |
| ATP | 500 μM | 0.21 ± 0.048∗ | 0.41 ± 0.032∗∗∗ | |
| AtPep1 | 1 μM | 0.08 ± 0.048 | 0.76 ± 0.256∗∗∗ | |
| Potato systemin | 0.25 μM | 0.84 ± 0.044∗∗∗ | 0.12 ± 0.047∗ | |